Migration route selection of juvenile Chinook salmon at the Delta Cross Channel, and the role of water velocity and individual movement patterns

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Volumn 96, Issue 2-3, 2013, Pages 215-224

  Steel, Anna E ^a   Sandstrom, Philip T ^a   Brandes, Patricia L ^b   Klimley, A Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Positioning system; Sacramento San Joaquin Delta; Ultrasonic telemetry; Water velocity

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; JUVENILE; MIGRATION ROUTE; MOVEMENT; PROBABILITY; RIVER FLOW; SALMONID FISHERY; SMOLT; SURVIVAL;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 84872184939     PISSN: 03781909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-012-9992-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams N, Rohdorf D, Evans S, Kelly J, Perry R (1998) Effects of surgically and gastrically implanted radio transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55: 781-787.
2. Anglea SM, Geist DR, Brown RS, Deters KA, McDonald RD (2004) Effects of acoustic transmitters on swimming performance and predator avoidance of juvenile Chinook salmon. N Am J Fish Manag 24: 162-170.
3. Brandes PL, McLain JS (2001) Juvenile Chinook Salmon abundance, distribution, and survival in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary. In: Brown LR (ed) Contributions to the Biology of Central Valley Salmonids, Fish Bulletin 179. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, pp 39-136.
4. Brown LR, Bauer ML (2010) Effects of hydrologic infrastructure on flow regimes of California's Central Valley rivers: implications for fish populations. River Res Appl 26: 751-765.
5. Brown RS, Cooke SJ, Anderson WG, McKinley RS (1999) Evidence to challenge the "2 % rule" for biotelemetry. N Am J Fish Manag 19: 867-871.
6. Heinze G, Schemper M (2002) A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med 21: 2409-2419. doi: 10. 1002/sim. 1047.
7. Lacroix GL, Knox D, McCurdy P (2004) Effects of implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on Juvenile Atlantic Salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 133: 211-220. doi: 10. 1577/T03-071.
8. Michel CJ, Ammann AA, Chapman ED, Sandstrom PT, Fish HE, Thomas MJ, Singer GP, Lindley ST, Klimley AP, MacFarlane B (2011) The effects of environmental factors on the migratory patterns of Sacramento River yearling late-fall run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Environ Biol Fish (this issue).
9. Montgomery J, Carton G, Voigt R, Baker C, Diebel C (2000) Sensory processing of water currents by fishes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 355: 1325-1327.
10. Moore A, Ives S, Mead TA, Talks L (1998) The migratory behavior of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts in the River Test and Southampton Water, southern England. Hydrobiologia 372: 295-304.
11. Moore A, Potter ECE, Milner NJ, Bamber S (1995) The migratory behavior of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts in the estuary of the River Conwy, North Wales. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52: 1923-1935.
12. Moore A, Russell IC, Potter ECE (1990) The effects of intraperitoneally implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on the behavior and physiclogy of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 37: 713-722.
13. Moser ML, Olson AF, Quinn TP (1991) Riverine and estuarine migratory behavior of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) smolts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48: 1670-1678.
14. Moyle PB (1994) The decline of anadramous fishes in California. Conserv Biol 8: 869-870.
15. Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA (1991) Pacific salmon at the crossroads-stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16: 4-21.
16. Nestler JM, Goodwin RA, Smith DL, Anderson JJ, Li S (2008) Optimum fish passage and guidance designs are based in the hydrogeomorphology of natural rivers. River Res Appl 24: 148-168.
17. Newman KB, Brandes PL (2010) Hierarchical modeling of Juvenile Chinook Salmon Survival as a function of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water exports. N Am J Fish Manag 30: 157-169. doi: 10. 1577/m07-188. 1.
18. Nichols FH, Cloern JE, Luoma SN, Peterson DH (1986) The modification of an estuary. Science 231: 567-573.
19. [NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (April 15, 2004) 'Endangered and threatened species: establishment of species of concern list, addition of species to species of concern list, description of factors for identifying species of concern, and revision of candidate species list under the endangered species act' Federal Register, 69. ID 020304D.
20. [NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (June 28, 2005) 'Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for 16 ESUs of West Coast Salmon, and Final 4(d) Protective Regulations for Threatened Salmon ESUs.' Federal Register, 70. Docket No. 040525161-515-02.
21. Perry RW (2010) Survival and migration dynamics of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytshca) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Dissertation, University of Washington.
22. Perry RW, Skalski JR, Brandes PL, Sandstrom PT, Klimley AP, Ammann A, MacFarlane B (2010) Estimating survival and migration route probabilities of Juvenile Chinook Salmon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. N Am J Fish Manag 30: 142-156. doi: 10. 1577/m08-200. 1.
23. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 3-900051-07-0, http://www. R-project. org.
24. VEMCO (2008) VR-2W positioning system (VPS) user manual. VEMCO Division, AMIRIX Systems inc, Halifax, p 44.
25. Zeug SC, Albertson LK, Lenihan H, Hardy J, Cardinale B (2011) Predictors of Chinook salmon extirpation in California's Central Valley. Fish Manag Ecol 18: 61-71.