Prototype for internet support of pregnant women and mothers with type 1 diabetes: Focus group testing

Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 97-103

  Adolfsson, Annsofie ^a,b   Jansson, Malin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SKÖVDE   (Sweden)

^b SKARABORG HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Focus group interview; Pregnancy; Type 1 diabetes; Web support

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872178796     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11791578     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S32799     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agardh C, Berne C, editors. Diabetes. 4th ed. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber; 2009.
2. ter Braak E, Evers I, Willem Erkelens D, Visser G. Maternal hypoglycemia during pregnancy in type 1 diabetes: maternal and fetal consequences. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002;18:96-105.
3. Inkster ME, Fahey TP, Donnan PT, Leese GP, Mires GJ, Murphy DJ. Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006;6:30.
4. Kapoor N, Sankaran S, Hyer S, Shehata H. Diabetes in pregnancy: a review of current evidence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19: 586-590.
5. Berg M, Lundgren I, Lindmark G. Childbirth experience in women at high risk: is it improved by use of a birth plan? J Perinatal Educ. 2003; 12:1-15.
6. Lavender T, Platt M, Tsekiri-O'Brien E, Hart A, Turner M, Cork M. Women's perception of being pregnant and having pregestational diabetes. Midwifery. 2010;26:589-595.
7. Berg M, Honkasalo ML. Pregnancy and diabetes - a hermeneutic phenomenological study of women's experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;21:39-48.
8. Berg M, Sparud-Lundin C. Experiences of professional support during pregnancy and childbirth - a qualitative study of women with type 1 diabetes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:27.
9. Langer N, Langer O. Pre-existing diabetics: relationship between glycemic control and emotional status in pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Med. 1998;7:257-263.
10. Berg M. Pregnancy and diabetes: how women handle the challenges. J Perinat Educ. 2005;14:23-32.
11. Västra Götalandsregionen. Regionalt vårdprogram. Diabetes och graviditet. [Regional guidelines for diabetic and pregnancy.] Västra Götaland: Västra Götalandsregionen; 2008.
12. Lagan B, Sinclair M, Kernohan G. Internet use in pregnancy informs women ́s decision making: a web-based survey. Birth. 2010;37: 106-114.
13. Larsson M. A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery. 2009;25:14-20.
14. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patient's empowerment. Patent Educ Couns. 2009;74:61-69.
15. Wibeck V. Fokusgrupper. Om fokuserade gruppintervjuer som undersökningsmetod. [Focus Groups Interview. A book about the method of focus group interviews.] Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur; 2000.
16. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. London, UK: Sage Publications Inc; 1980.
17. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. London, UK: Sage Publications Inc; 1996.
18. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105-112.
19. Baxter LA. Content analysis. In: Montgomery BM, Duck S, editors. Studying Interpersonal Interaction. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1991.