Optimal use of GPS transmitter for estimating species migration rate

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 249, Issue , 2013, Pages 37-41

  Pagendam, D E ^a   Ross, J V ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Estimation; GPS transmitters; Metapopulation networks; Optimal design; Stochastic models

Indexed keywords

BASIC CONDITIONS; BEST ESTIMATES; EFFICIENCY GAIN; GPS TRANSMITTERS; IDENTIFIABILITY; MATLAB CODE; METAPOPULATIONS; MIGRATION RATES; MODEL PARAMETERS; NUMBER OF SAMPLES; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL PROGRAMMING; OPTIMAL SAMPLING; OPTIMAL TIMING; REAL NETWORKS; SAMPLING SCHEDULE; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; THREE PARAMETERS; UNDERLYING NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS; CONSERVATION; ESTIMATION; OPTIMIZATION; STOCHASTIC MODELS; TRANSMITTERS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHM; BIRD; GPS; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; SAMPLING; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

STRIGIFORMES; STRIX OCCIDENTALIS OCCIDENTALIS;

EID: 84872159419     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cook A., Gibson G., Gilligan C. Optimal observation times in experimental epidemic processes. Biometrics 2008, 64:860-868.
2. Day J., Possingham H. A stochastic metapopulation model with variability in patch size and position. Theoretical Population Biology 1995, 48:333-360.
3. Gilpin M., Diamond J. Calculation of immigration and extinction curves from the species-area-distance relation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America 1976, 73:4130-4134.
4. Inchausti P., Weimerskirch H. Dispersal and metapopulation dynamics of an oceanic seabird, the wandering albatross, and its consequences for its response to long-line fisheries. Journal of Animal Ecology 2002, 71:765-770.
5. Lahaye W., Gutierrez R., Akcakaya H. Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in Southern California. Journal of Animal Ecology 1994, 63:775-785.
6. Lotek Wireless Inc.,. 2011 Fish & wildlife monitoring, http://www.lotek.com/.
7. Norris J. Markov chains 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Pagendam D., Pollett P. Optimal sampling and problematic likelihood functions in a simple population model. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2009, 14:759-767.
9. Pagendam D., Pollett P. Locally optimal designs for the simple death process. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2010, 140:3096-3105.
10. Pagendam D., Pollett P. Robust optimal observation of a metapopulation. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:2521-2525.
11. Podlich, H., Faddy, M. and Smyth, G. (1999) Likelihood computations for extended Poisson process models. Interstat September no.1.
12. Ross J., Pollett P. Simple rules for ranking and optimally managing metapopulations. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221:2515-2520.
13. Ross J., Sirl D., Pollett P., Possingham H. Metapopulation persistence in a dynamic landscape: more habitat or better stewardship?. Ecological Applications 2008, 18:590-598.
14. Shuford, W. and Gardali, T.(editors) (2008) California Bird Species of Special Concern: A Ranked Assessment of Species, Subspecies, and Distinct Populations of Birds of Immediate Conservation Concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
15. Sidje R. EXPOKIT. A software package for computing matrix exponentials. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 1998, 24:130-156.
16. Walter E., Pronzato L. Optimal experiment design for nonlinear models subject to large prior uncertainties. The American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 1987, 243:R530-R534.