The Human Brain Maintains Contradictory and Redundant Auditory Sensory Predictions

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Pieszek, Marika ^a   Widmann, Andreas ^a   Gruber, Thomas ^b   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INCONGRUENCY RESPONSE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RESPONSE TIME; SOUND DETECTION; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SOUND;

EID: 84872151191     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053634     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Mumford D, (1992) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. Biol Cybern 66 (3): 241-251.
2. Bar M, (2007) The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 11 (7): 280-289.
3. Friston K, Kiebel S, (2009) Cortical circuits for perceptual inference. Neural Netw 22 (8): 1093-1104.
4. Bubic A, von Cramon DY, Schubotz RI, (2010) Prediction, cognition and the brain. Front Hum Neurosci 4: 25.
5. Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, Sussman E, Paavilainen P, Winkler I, (2001) "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci 24 (5): 283-288.
6. Schröger E, (2005) The Mismatch Negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica united with Acustica 91: 490-501.
7. Winkler I, Denham SL, Nelken I, (2009) Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends Cogn Sci 13 (12): 532-540.
8. Näätänen R, Kujala T, Winkler I, (2011) Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: a unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology 48 (1): 4-22.
9. Näätänen R, Winkler I, (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 125 (6): 826-859.
10. Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I, (2000) Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 5 (3-4): 151-166.
11. Deouell LY, (2007) The Frontal Generator of the Mismatch Negativity Revisited. Journal of Psychophysiology 21 (3-4): 188-203.
12. Bendixen A, Schröger E, Winkler I, (2009) I heard that coming: event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. J Neurosci 29 (26): 8447-8451.
13. Schröger E, (2007) Mismatch Negativity- A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology 21 (3-4): 138-146.
14. Winkler I, (2007) Interpreting the Mismatch Negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology 21 (3-4): 147-163.
15. Widmann A, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Kujala A, Schröger E, (2004) From symbols to sounds: visual symbolic information activates sound. Psychophysiology 41 (5): 709-715.
16. Aoyama A, Endo H, Honda S, Takeda T, (2006) Modulation of early auditory processing by visually based sound prediction. Brain Res 1068 (1): 194-204.
17. Ullsperger P, Erdmann U, Freude G, Dehoff W, (2006) When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction. Int J Psychophysiol 59 (1): 3-7.
18. Andres AJ, Oram CJE, Joanisse MF, (2011) Congruency of auditory sounds and visual letters modulates mismatch negativity and P300 event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol 79 (2): 137-146.
19. Mittag M, Takegata R, Kujala T, (2011) The effects of visual material and temporal synchrony on the processing of letters and speech sounds. Exp Brain Res 211 (2): 287-298.
20. Bendixen A, San Miguel I, Schröger E, (2011) Early electrophysiological indicators for predictive processing in audition: A review. Int J Psychophysiol. 83 (2): 120-131.
21. Winkler I, Karmos G, Näätänen R, (1996) Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 742 (1-2): 239-252.
22. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ, (2009) The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 120 (3): 453-463.
23. Widmann A, Gruber T, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Schröger E, (2007) Binding symbols and sounds: evidence from event-related oscillatory gamma-band activity. Cereb Cortex 17 (11): 2696-2702.
24. Froyen D, Van Atteveldt N, Bonte M, Blomert L, (2008) Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds. Neurosci Lett 430 (1): 23-28.
25. Giard MH, Peronnet F, (1999) Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J Cogn Neurosci 11 (5): 473-490.
26. Molholm S, Sehatpour P, Mehta AD, Shpaner M, Gomez-Ramirez M, et al. (2006) Audio-visual multisensory integration in superior parietal lobule revealed by human intracranial recordings. J Neurophysiol 96 (2): 721-729.
27. Rahne T, Böckmann M, von Specht H, Sussman ES, (2007) Visual cues can modulate integration and segregation of objects in auditory scene analysis. Brain Res 1144: 127-135.
28. Schröger E, Widmann A, (1998) Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology 35 (6): 755-759.
29. Brown CR, Clarke AR, Barry RJ, (2007) Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol 65 (2): 122-131.
30. Boll S, Berti S, (2009) Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 46 (3): 645-654.
31. Beauchamp MS, Argall BD, Bodurka J, Duyn JH, Martin A, (2004) Unraveling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 7 (11): 1190-1192.
32. Ritter W, Sussman E, Deacon D, Cowan N, Vaughan HG Jr, (1999) Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology 36 (6): 835-838.
33. Horváth J, Czigler I, Sussman E, Winkler I, (2001) Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Cogn Brain Res 12 (1): 131-144.
34. Sinkkonen J (1999) Information and resource allocation. In: Baddeley R, Hancock P, Foldiak P, editors. Information theory and the brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 241-254.
35. Paavilainen P, Valppu S, Näätänen R, (2001) The additivity of the auditory feature analysis in the human brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity: 1+1 approximately 2 but 1+1+1. Neurosci Lett 301 (3): 179-182.
36. Schröger E, (1995) Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions. Psychophysiology 32 (1): 55-65.
37. Oldfield RC, (1971) Assessment and analysis of handedness- Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 (1): 97-113.
38. Schlögl A, Keinrath C, Zimmermann D, Scherer R, Leeb R, et al. (2007) A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 118 (1): 98-104.
39. Delorme A, Makeig S, (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134 (1): 9-21.
40. Widmann A, Schröger E, (2012) Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data. Front Psychol 3: 233 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00233.
41. Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, McCallum WC, Winter AL, (1964) Contingent Negative Variation: An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain. Nature 203: 380-384.
42. Luck SJ (2005) An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 373 p.
43. Teder-Sälejärvi WA, McDonald JJ, Di Russo F, Hillyard SA, (2002) An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event-related potential (ERP) recordings. Cogn Brain Res 14 (1): 106-114.
44. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF, (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72 (2): 184-187.
45. Bosch-Bayard J, Valdés-Sosa P, Virues-Alba T, Aubert-Vázquez E, John ER, et al. (2001) 3D statistical parametric mapping of EEG source spectra by means of variable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA). Clin Electroencephalogr 32 (2): 47-61.
46. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL et al. (1993) 3D Statistical Neuroanatomical Models from 305 MRI Volumes. London: M.T.P. Press.
47. Worsley KJ, Marrett S, Neelin P, Evans AC, (1996) Searching scale space for activation in PET images. Hum Brain Mapp 4 (1): 74-90.
48. Besle J, Fort A, Giard MH, (2005) Is the auditory sensory memory sensitive to visual information. Exp Brain Res 166 (3-4): 337-344.
49. Gondan M, Röder B, (2006) A new method for detecting interactions between the senses in event-related potentials. Brain Res 1073-1074: 389-397.
50. Olejnik S, Algina J, (2000) Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol 25 (3): 241-286.
51. Bakeman R, (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37 (3): 379-384.
52. Giard MH, Perrin F, Pernier J, Bouchet P, (1990) Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 27 (6): 627-640.
53. Deouell LY, Bentin S, Giard MH, (1998) Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators. Psychophysiology 35 (4): 355-365.
54. Grimm S, Roeber U, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Schröger E, (2006) Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres. Neuroimage 32 (1): 275-282.
55. Bendixen A, Prinz W, Horváth J, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Schröger E, (2008) Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage 41 (3): 1111-1119.
56. Schröger E, Bendixen A, Trujillo-Barreto NJ, Roeber U, (2007) Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS One 2 (11): e1131.
57. Stein BE, Stanford TR, (2008) Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat Rev Neurosci 9 (4): 255-266.
58. May PJ, Tiitinen H, (2010) Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47 (1): 66-122.
59. Todorovic A, van Ede F, Maris E, de Lange FP, (2011) Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J Neurosci 31 (25): 9118-9123.
60. Garrido MI, Friston KJ, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Baldeweg T, et al. (2008) The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm. Neuroimage 42 (2): 936-944.
61. Friston K, Kiebel S, (2009) Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364 (1521): 1211-1221.
62. Friston K, (2012) Prediction, perception and agency. Int J Psychophysiol 83 (2): 248-252.
63. Rinne T, Antila S, Winkler I, (2001) Mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down predictive information. Neuroreport 12 (10): 2209-2213.
64. Sussman E, Winkler I, Schröger E, (2003) Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychon Bull Rev 10 (3): 630-637.
65. Zmigrod S, Spapé M, Hommel B, (2009) Intermodal event files: integrating features across vision, audition, taction, and action. Psychol Res 73 (5): 674-684.
66. Deacon D, Nousak JM, Pilotti M, Ritter W, Yang CM, (1998) Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts. Psychophysiology 35 (4): 413-419.
67. Giard MH, Lavikainen J, Reinikainen K, Perrin F, Bertrand O, et al. (1995) Separate Representation of Stimulus Frequency, Intensity, and Duration in Auditory Sensory Memory: An Event-Related Potential and Dipole-Model Analysis. J Cogn Neurosci 7 (2): 133-143.
68. Molholm S, Martinez A, Ritter W, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, (2005) The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. Cereb Cortex 15 (5): 545-551.
69. Bregman AS (1990) Auditory scene analysis. The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. xiii, 773 p.
70. Näätänen R, Simpson M, Loveless NE, (1982) Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol Psychol 14 (1-2): 53-98.
71. Novak GP, Ritter W, Vaughan H, Wiznitzer ML, (1990) Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75 (4): 255-275.
72. Patel SH, Azzam PN, (2005) Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential. Int J Med Sci 2 (4): 147-154.
73. Dimoska A, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, (2006) The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection. Brain Cogn 62 (2): 98-112.
74. Gruendler TOJ, Ullsperger M, Huster RJ, (2011) Event-related potential correlates of performance-monitoring in a lateralized time-estimation task. PLoS One 6 (10): e25591.
75. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD, (2004) Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41 (1): 157-160.
76. Folstein JR, van Petten C, (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45 (1): 152-170.
77. Miller J, (1982) Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cogn Psychol 14 (2): 247-279.
78. Gratton G, Bosco CM, Kramer AF, Coles MG, Wickens CD, et al. (1990) Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75 (5): 419-432.
79. Nieuwenhuis S, De Geus EJ, Aston-Jones G, (2010) The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 48 (2): 162-175.