Comparing the effectiveness of computerized adverse drug event monitoring systems to enhance clinical decision support for hospitalized patients

Applied Clinical Informatics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 293-303

  Petratos, G N ^a   Kim, Y ^b   Evans, R S ^c,d   Williams, S D ^e   Gardner, Reed M ^c,d  

^a HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d Intermountain Health Care ^*  (United States)

^e UTAH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support; Data collection; Error management and prevention; Pharmacy information systems; System improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872150455     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18690327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4338/ACI-2009-11-RA-0009     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jha AK et al. Identifying adverse drug events: development of a computer-based monitor and comparison with chart review and stimulated voluntary report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 305-314.
2. Cullen DJ et al. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1995; 21: 541-548.
3. Classen DC et al. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA 1991; 266: 2847-2851.
4. Hougland P et al. Performance of International Classification Of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes as an adverse drug event surveillance system. Med Care 2006; 44: 629-636.
5. Bates DW et al. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 115-128.
6. AHRQ. Reducing and Preventing Adverse Drug Events to Decrease Hospital Costs. Research in Action, Issue 1 2001; AHRQ Publication Number 01-0020.
7. http://imi.europa.eu/documents_en.html
8. http://omop.fnih.org/node/22
9. http://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Publications/ICD9-CM/2001/Guide02.RTF. ICD9 Coding Guidelines (FY02), 2002.
10. ICD9 Coding Handbook. In: Brown F, ed: American Hospital Association 2002: 400.
11. McCarthy EP et al. Does clinical evidence support ICD9 diagnosis coding of complications? Med Care 2000; 38: 868-876.
12. Committee UHD. Adverse Events Related to Medical Care, Utah: 1995-99. Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health, 2001.
13. Gardner RM, Pryor TA, Warner HR. The HELP hospital information system: update 1998. Int J Med Inf 1999; 54: 169-182.
14. The ICD9 Classification of Adverse Events, Version 2002. Salt Lake City, UT: The Utah/Missouri Patient Safety Project National Expert Panel, 2002.
15. 3M Codefinder Software. Vol. 2003: 3M Health Information Systems, 2003.
16. Pryor TA et al. The HELP system. J Med Syst 1983; 7: 87-102.
17. Haug PJ et al. Decision support in medicine: examples from the HELP system. Comput Biomed Res 1994; 27: 396-418.
18. Kuperman GJ, Gardner RM, Pryor TA. HELP: A Dynamic Hospital Information System. In: Orthner HF, ed. Computers and Medicine: Springer-Verlag, 1990.
19. Evans RS et al. Development of a computerized adverse drug event monitor. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1991: 23-27.
20. Classen DC et al. Description of a computerized adverse drug event monitor using a hospital information system. Hosp Pharm 1992; 27: 774, 776-9, 783.
21. Evans RS et al. Prevention of adverse drug events through computerized surveillance. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1992: 437-441.
22. Naranjo CA, Lanctot KL. Recent developments in computer-assisted diagnosis of putative adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf 1991; 6: 315-322.
23. Classen DC et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1997; 277: 301-306.
24. Evans RS et al. Using a hospital information system to assess the effects of adverse drug events. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993: 161-165.
25. Evans RS et al. Preventing adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28: 523-527.
26. Petratos GN. Masters Thesis Published by the University of Utah, 2003.
27. Martyn CN. Capture-recapture methods in surveys of diseases of the nervous system. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64: 2-3.
28. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a metaanalysis of prospective studies. JAMA 1998; 279: 1200-1205.
29. Hafner JW Jr et al. Adverse drug events in emergency department patients. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 39: 258-267.
30. Rothschild JM et al. Analysis of medication-related malpractice claims: causes, preventability, and costs. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 2414-2420.
31. Friedman C et al. Natural language processing in an operational clinical information system. Nat Lang Eng 1995; 1: 83-108.
32. Jha AK et al. Identifying hospital admissions due to adverse drug events using a computer-based monitor. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10: 113-119.
33. Phansalkar S et al. Use of verbal protocol analysis for identification of ADE signals. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006: 1063.
34. Phansalkar S et al. Understanding pharmacist decision making for adverse drug event (ADE) detection. J Eval Clin Pract 2009; 15: 266-275.