Tool use kinematics across different modes of execution. Implications for action representation and apraxia

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 184-199

  Hermsdörfer, Joachim ^a,b   Li, Yong ^a   Randerath, Jennifer ^c   Roby Brami, Agnès ^d   Goldenberg, Georg ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BOGENHAUSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Action representation; Apraxia; Movement analysis; Pantomime; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; APRAXIA; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DAMAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMIANOPIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; KINEMATICS; LEFT HANDEDNESS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

APRAXIAS; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84872139956     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ackermann H., Riecker A. The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis. Brain and Language 2004, 89(2):320-328.
2. Bonini L., Rozzi S., Serventi F.U., Simone L., Ferrari P.F., Fogassi L. Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 20(6):1372-1385.
3. Buxbaum L.J., Giovannetti T., Libon D. The role of the dynamic body schema in praxis: Evidence from primary progressive apraxia. Brain and Cognition 2000, 44(2):166-191.
4. Clark M.A., Merians A.S., Kothari A., Poizner H., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., et al. Spatial planning deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1994, 117:1093-1106.
5. Crawford J.R., Garthwaite P.H. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40(8):1196-1208.
6. De Renzi Apraxia. Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology 1990, 245-263. Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford. F. Boller, J. Grafman (Eds.).
7. De Renzi E., Luchelli F. Ideational apraxia. Brain 1988, 111:1173-1185.
8. Filimon F., Nelson J.D., Hagler D.J., Sereno M.I. Human cortical representations for reaching: Mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery. NeuroImage 2007, 37(4):1315-1328.
9. Fisk J.D., Goodale M.A. The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: Hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Experimental Brain Research 1988, 72:425-435.
10. Gerardin E., Sirigu A., Lehéricy S., Poline J.-B., Gaymard B., Marsault C., et al. Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:1093-1104.
11. Goldenberg G. Apraxia. Handbook of Clinical Neurology - Neuropsychology and Behavior 2008, 323-338. Elsevier, Edinburgh, Ch. 16. G. Goldenberg, B. Miller (Eds.).
12. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36(7):581-589.
13. Goldenberg G., Hartmann K., Schlott I. Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: Apraxia or asymbolia?. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(12):1565-1573.
14. Goldenberg G., Hentze S., Hermsdörfer J. The effect of tactile feedback on pantomime of tool use in apraxia. Neurology 2004, 63(10):1863-1867.
15. Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J., Glindemann R., Rorden C., Karnath H.O. Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(12):2769-2776.
16. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132(6):1645-1655.
17. Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S., Keillor J.M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32(10):1159-1178.
18. Grèzes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2001, 12(1):1-19.
19. Haaland K.Y., Harrington D.L., Knight R.T. Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain 2000, 123:2306-2313.
20. Haaland K.Y., Prestopnik J.L., Knight R.T., Lee R.R. Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 2004, 127(Pt 5):1145-1158.
21. Hanakawa T., Dimyan M.A., Hallett M. Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: A time-course study with functional MRI. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(12):2775-2788.
22. Hanna-Pladdy B., Heilman K.M., Foundas A.L. Cortical and subcortical contributions to ideomotor apraxia: Analysis of task demands and error types. Brain 2001, 124(12):2513-2527.
23. Hermsdörfer J., Blankenfeld H., Goldenberg G. The dependence of ipsilesional aiming deficits on task demands, lesioned hemisphere, and apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41(12):1628-1643.
24. Hermsdörfer J., Hentze S., Goldenberg G. Spatial and kinematic features of apraxic movement depend on the mode of execution. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(10):1642-1652.
25. Hermsdörfer J., Laimgruber K., Kerkhoff G., Mai N., Goldenberg G. Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1999, 128(1-2):41-51.
26. Hermsdörfer J., Terlinden G., Mühlau M., Goldenberg G., Wohlschläger A.M. Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: Evidence from an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2007, 36(Suppl. 2):109-118.
27. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S103-S109.
28. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 8(2):71-78.
29. Johnson-Frey S.H., Newman-Norlund R., Grafton S.T. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(6):681-695.
30. Laimgruber K., Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J. Manual and hemispheric asymmetries in the execution of actual and pantomimed prehension. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(5):682-692.
31. Lewis J.W. Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscientist 2006, 12(3):211-231.
32. Liepmann H. Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet 1908, Karger, Berlin.
33. Lotze M., Montoya P., Erb M., Hulsmann E., Flor H., Klose U., et al. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements - An FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(5):491-501.
34. Poizner H., Clark M.A., Merians A.S., Macauley B., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Joint coordination deficits in limb apraxia. Brain 1995, 118:227-242.
35. Poizner H., Mack L., Verfaellie M., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Three-dimensional computer graphic analysis of apraxia. Brain 1990, 113:85-101.
36. Randerath J., Goldenberg G., Spijkers W., Li Y., Hermsdörfer J. Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. NeuroImage 2010, 53(1):171-180.
37. Randerath J., Li Y., Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J. Grasping tools: Effects of task and apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(2):497-505.
38. Randerath J., Spijkers W., Goldenberg G., Li Y., Hermsdörfer J. From Pantomime to actual use: How affordances can facilitate actual tool-use. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2410-2416.
39. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2002, 12(2):149-154.
40. Rorden C., Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behavioral Neurology 2000, 12(4):191-200.
41. Rorden C., Karnath H.O. Using human brain lesions to infer function: A relic from a past era in the fMRI age?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5(10):813-819.
42. Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action 1997, Psychology Press, East Sussex (UK).
43. Rothi L.J.G., Raymer A.M., Heilman K.M. Limb praxis assessment. Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action 1997, 61-73. Psychology Press, East Sussex (UK). L.J.G. Rothi, K.M. Heilman (Eds.).
44. Salmaso D., Longoni A.M. Problems in the assessment of hand preference. Cortex 1985, 21:533-549.
45. Schaefer S.Y., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control. Brain 2007, 130(Pt 8):2146-2158.
46. Schaefer S.Y., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(13):2953-2966.
47. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1975, 82:225-260.
48. Stark E., Asher I., Abeles M. Encoding of reach and grasp by single neurons in premotor cortex is independent of recording site. Journal of Neurophysiology 2007, 97(5):3351-3364.
49. Wada Y., Nakagawa Y., Nishikawa T., Aso N., Inokawa M., Kashiwagi A., et al. Role of somatosensory feedback from tools in realizing movements by patients with ideomotor apraxia. European Neurology 1999, 41(2):73-78.
50. Weiss P.H., Jeannerod M., Paulignan Y., Freund H.J. Is the organization of goal-directed action modality-specific - A common temporal structure. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(8):1136-1147.
51. Westwood D.A., Schweizer T.A., Heath M.D., Roy E.A., Dixon M.J., Black S.E. Transitive gesture production in apraxia: Visual and nonvisual sensory contributions. Brain and Cognition 2001, 46(1-2):300-304.
52. Winstein C.J., Pohl P.S. Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Experimental Brain Research 1995, 105:163-174.