An overview of data for wake model evaluation in the Virtual Wakes Laboratory

Applied Energy

Volumn 104, Issue , 2013, Pages 834-844

  Barthelmie, R J ^a   Pryor, S C ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurements; Modeling; Wakes; Wind farm; Wind turbine

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; LOADING; MEASUREMENTS; MODELS; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINES;

APPROPRIATE METRICS; FATIGUE LOADINGS; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; OPEN ACCESS RESOURCES; POWER PRODUCTION; PROGNOSTIC MODEL; WAKE MODEL; WIND FARM; WIND TURBINE WAKES;

WAKES;

DATA SET; FATIGUE; LABORATORY METHOD; METEOROLOGY; MODEL TEST; NUMERICAL MODEL; OFFSHORE APPLICATION; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; WAKE; WIND FARM; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 84872136922     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Barthelmie R.J., Jensen L.E. Evaluation of power losses due to wind turbine wakes at the Nysted offshore wind farm. Wind Energy 2010, 13:573-586.
2. Frandsen S., Thøgersen M.L. Integrated fatigue loading for wind turbines in wind farms by combining ambient turbulence and wakes. Wind Eng 1999, 23:327-339.
3. Larsen G.C. Offshore fatigue design turbulence. Wind Energy 2001, 4(3):107-120.
4. Barthelmie RJ, Hansen KS, Pryor SC. Meteorological controls on wind turbine wakes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012. doi: 10.1109/JPROC [accepted 5.06.12].
5. Barthelmie R.J., Murray F., Pryor S.C. The economic benefit of short-term forecasting for wind energy in the UK electricity market. Energy Policy 2008, 36(5):1687-1696.
6. Politis E.S., et al. Modeling wake effects in large wind farms in complex terrain: the problem, the methods and the issues. Wind Energy 2012, 15:161-182.
7. Taylor G.J. Wake and performance measurements on the Lawson-Tancred 17m horizontal-axis windmill. IEEE Proc 1983, 130(A9):604-612.
8. Hogstrom U., et al. A field study of the wake behind a 2MW wind turbine. Atmos Environ 1988, 22(4):803-820.
9. Taylor GJ. Wake measurements on the Nibe wind turbines in Denmark, 1990, National Power ETSU WN 5020.
10. Hansen KS et al. Evaluation of test results from the two Danish Nibe turbines in European wind energy conference and exhibition proceedings vol. 2. Rome; 1986.
11. Frandsen S et al. Measurements on and modelling of offshore wind farms; 1996. p. 101. doi: Risø-R-903(EN).
12. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Meteorological aspects of offshore wind energy - observations from the Vindeby wind farm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1996, 62(2-3):191-211.
13. Højstrup J. Spectral coherence in wind turbine wakes. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1999, 80:137-146.
14. Schepers J.G., Obdam T.S., Prospathopoulos J. Analysis of wake measurements from the ECN Wind turbine test site Wieringermeer. EWTW. Wind Energy 2011, 15:575-591.
15. Lundsager P., Petersen H., Frandsen S.T. The dynamic behaviors of the stall regulated Nibe A wind turbine. Measurements and a model of stall induced vibrations 1981, 70. Risoe National Laboratory, Roskilde.
16. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Offshore wind turbine wakes measured by SODAR. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2003, 30:466-477.
17. Jensen L. Wake measurements from the Horns Rev wind farm. In: European wind energy conference; 2004. EWEA (on CD).
18. Hasager C.B., et al. Remote sensing observation used in offshore wind energy. IEEE J Select Top Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 2008, 1(1):67-79.
19. Christiansen M.B., Hasager C. Wake effects of large offshore wind farms identified from satellite SAR. Remote Sens Environ 2005, 98:251-268.
20. Bingöl F., Mann J., Larsen G.C. Light detection and ranging measurements of wake dynamics part I: one-dimensional scanning. Wind Energy 2010, 13(1):51-61.
21. Krishnamurthy R., Calhoun R., Fernando H. Large-Eddy simulation-based retrieval of dissipation from coherent doppler Lidar data. Bound-Layer Meteorol 2010, 136(1):45-57.
22. Christiansen M.B., Hasager C. Using airborne and satellite SAR for wake mapping offshore. Wind Energy 2006, 9:437-455.
23. Hirth B.D., et al. Measuring a utility-scale turbine wake using the TTUKa mobile research radars. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2012, 29(6):765-771.
24. Kasler Y., et al. Wake measurements of a multi-mw wind turbine with coherent long-range pulsed doppler wind Lidar. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2010, 27(9):1529-1532.
25. Milborrow D.J. Wake and cluster research: past, present and future. Phys Sci, Measur Instrum, Manage Edu, Rev, IEE Proc A 1983, 130(9):566-573.
26. Crespo A., Hernandez J., Frandsen S. Survey and modelling methods for wind turbine wakes and wind farms. Wind Energy 1999, 2:1-24.
27. Mortensen NG et al. Getting started with WAsP 9. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory; 2007. p. 72. ISBN 978-87-550-3607-9 [353 topics].
28. Ainslie J.F. Calculating the flow field in the wake of wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1988, 27:213-224.
29. Schlez W, Neubert A. New developments in large wind farm modelling. In: European wind energy conference; 2009. Marseilles.
30. Lange B., et al. Improvement of the wind farm model FLaP (Farm Layout Program) for offshore applications. Wind Energy 2003, 6:87-104.
31. Crespo A., et al. Experimental validation of the UPM computer code to calculate wind turbine wakes and comparison with other models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1988, 27:77-88.
32. Henneman B. Numerical aspects of the WAKEFARM program; 2003. ECN. p. 31.
33. Sanderse B., van der Pijl S.P., Koren B. Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Wind Energy 2011, 14(7):799-819.
34. Réthoré P.E., et al. A CFD model of the wake of an offshore wind farm: using a prescribed wake inflow. J Phys Conf Ser 2007,. 75 p. 012047 (7 p.).
35. Ivanell S et al. ACL modelling of wake interaction in Horns Rev wind farm. In: European offshore wind energy conference; 2009. Stockholm, September 2009.
36. Politis ES et al. CFD modeling issues of wind turbine wakes under stable atmospheric conditions. In: European wind energy conference, 2009. Marseille, March 2009.
37. Cabezón D et al. CFD modelling of the interaction between the Surface Boundary Layer and rotor wake. Comparison of results obtained with different turbulence models and mesh strategies. In: European wind energy conference and exhibition, 2009. Marseille, March 2009.
38. Troldborg N., et al. Numerical simulations of wake interaction between two wind turbines at various inflow conditions. Wind Energy 2011, 14(7):859-876.
39. Troldborg N., Sørensen J.N., Mikkelsen R. Numerical simulations of wake characteristics of a wind turbine in uniform in flow. Wind Energy 2010, 13:86-99.
40. Ivanell S., et al. Analysis of numerically generated wake structures. Wind Energy 2009, 12(1):63-80.
41. Jimenez A., et al. Large-eddy simulation of spectral coherence in a wind turbine wake. Environ Res Lett 2008, 015004:9.
42. Churchfield MJ et al. A large eddy simulation of wind-plant aerodynamics. In: 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, 2012. Nashville, Tennessee January 9-12, 2012.
43. Churchfield M.J., et al. A numerical study of the effects of atmospheric and wake turbulence on wind turbine dynamics. J Turbul 2012, 10.1080/14685248.2012.668191.
44. Jensen NO. A note on wind turbine interaction. Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory; 1983. p. 16.
45. Frandsen S., et al. Analytical modelling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 2006, 9(1-2):39-53.
46. Frandsen S., et al. The making of a second-generation wind farm efficiency model-complex. Wind Energy 2009, 12:431-444.
47. Cabezón D., Migoya E., Crespo A. Comparison of turbulence models for the computational fluid dynamics simulation of wind turbine wakes in the atmospheric boundary layer. Wind Energy 2011, 14(7):909-921.
48. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Modelling and measuring flow and wind turbine wakes in large wind farms offshore. Wind Energy 2009, 12(5):431-444. 10.1002/we.348.
49. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Wind speed gradients in the coastal offshore environment: Issues pertaining to design and development of large offshore wind farms. Wind Eng 2007, 31(6):369-382.
50. Vermeer L., Sørensen J., Crespo A. Wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 2003, 39:467-510.
51. Schepers JG et al. Final report of IEA AnnexXVIII: Enhanced Field Rotor Aerodynamics Database; 2002, ECN-C-02-016: Petten. p. 353.
52. Rettenmeier A et al. Wind field analyses using a nacelle-based LiDAR system. In: European wind energy conference; 2010.
53. Wagner R et al. Power performance measured using a nacelle LiDAR. In European wind energy conference; 2011. Brussels.
54. Hassan U., Taylor G., Garrad A. The dynamic response of wind turbines operating in a wake flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1990, 27:113-126.
55. Frandsen ST et al. Summary report: The shadow effect of large wind farms: measurements, data analysis and modeling. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory/DTU; 2007. p. 34.
56. Barthelmie RJ et al., Modelling and measurements of power losses and turbulence intensity in wind turbine wakes at Middelgrunden offshore wind farm. Wind energy; 2007. 10. doi: 10.1002/we.238. p. 217-28.
57. Cutler N.J., Outhred H.R., MacGill I.F. Using nacelle-based wind speed observations to improve power curve modeling for wind power forecasting. Wind Energy 2012, 15:245-258.
58. Smaili A., Masson C. On the rotor effects upon nacelle anemometry for wind turbines. Wind Eng 2004, 28:695-714.
59. Frandsen ST et al. The generics of wind turbine nacelle anemometry. In: European wind energy conference; 2009.
60. Ganader H et al. Medium term evaluation of meteorological conditions, power performance and loads on the first Swedish offshore wind farm at Bockstigen. In: European wind energy association offshore wind energy conference; 2001. Brussels.
61. Lindelöw-Marsden P et al. Flow distortion on boom mounted cup anemometers. Risø-R-1738(EN): Risø National Laboratory; 2010. p. 39.
62. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Meteorological aspects of offshore wind energy: Observations from the Vindeby wind farm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1996, 62:191-211.
63. Motta M., Barthelmie R.J., Vølund P. The influence of non-logarithmic wind speed profiles on potential power output at Danish offshore sites. Wind Energy 2005, 8:219-236.
64. Schlez W., et al. ENDOW: Improvement of wake models within offshore windfarms. Wind Eng 2002, 25:281-287.
65. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Comparison of wake model simulations with offshore wind turbine wake profiles measured by sodar. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2006, 23(7):888-901.
66. Jørgensen HE et al. Modelling offshore wind resources and wind conditions. In: Copenhagen offshore wind. Copenhagen, October; 2005.
67. Barthelmie R., et al. Ten years of meteorological measurements for offshore wind farms. J SolEnergy Eng 2005, 127(2):170-176.
68. Frandsen S., Thomsen K. Changes in fatigue and extreme loading when moving wind farms offshore. Wind Eng 1997, 21:197-214.
69. Larsen G.C., et al. Wake meandering: a pragmatic approach. Wind Energy 2008, 11(4):377-395.
70. Moriarty P, Barthelmie RJ, Frandsen ST. Universal benchmarks for wind turbine wake and wind farm models. In: Euromech wind turbine wakes. Madrid 20-22 October, 2009.
71. Barthelmie R.J., et al. Quantifying the impact of wind turbine wakes on power output at offshore wind farms. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2010, 27(8):1302-1317.
72. Mücke T., Kleinhans D., Peinke J. Atmospheric turbulence and its influence on the alternating loads on wind turbines. Wind Energy 2011, 14(2):301-316.
73. Larsen T.J., et al. Validation of the Dynamic Wake Meander Model for Loads and Power Production in the Egmond aan Zee Wind Farm. Wind Energy 2012, 10.1002/we.
74. Hansen K.H., et al. The impact of turbulence intensity and atmospheric stability on power deficits due to wind turbine wakes at Horns Rev wind farm. Wind Energy 2012, 15(1):183-196. 10.1002/we.512.
75. Yamartino R.J. A comparison of several "single-pass" estimators of the standard deviation of wind direction. J Climate Appl Meteorol 1984, 23(9):1362-1366.
76. Weber R.O. Estimators for the standard deviations of lateral, longitudinal and vertical wind components. Atmos Environ 1998, 32:3639-3646.