Beyond use versus availability: Behaviour-explicit resource selection

Wildlife Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 424-430

  Wilson, Ryan R ^a   Gilbert Norton, Lynne ^b   Gese, Eric M ^b  

^a Wilderness Society   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

behaviour; coyote; resource selection; study design; use availability

Indexed keywords

CANIS LATRANS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84872132426     PISSN: 09096396     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2981/12-044     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aarts, G., MacKenzie, M. McConnell, B., Fedak, M. & Matthiopoulos, J. 2008: Estimating space-use and habitat preference from wildlife telemetry data. -Ecography 31: 140-160. (Pubitemid 351280981)
2. Aldridge, C.L. & Boyce, M.S. 2007: Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse. -Ecological Applications 17: 508-526. (Pubitemid 46607410)
3. Arlt, D. & Pa rt, T. 2007: Non-ideal breeding habitat selection: amismatch between preference and fitness. -Ecology 88: 792-801. (Pubitemid 46597085)
4. Barraquand,F.&Benhamou, S. 2008:Animalmovements in heterogeneous landscapes: identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. -Ecology 89: 3336-3348.
5. Bates, D. 2007: lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. -Rpackage version 0.99875-9.Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/ packages/lme4/index.html (Last accessed on 24 August 2012).
6. Beyer, H.L., Haydon, D.T., Morales, J.M., Frair, J.L., Hebblewhite,M.,Mitchell, M. &Matthiopoulos, J. 2010: The interpretation ofhabitat preferencemetrics under useavailability designs. -Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 2245-2254.
7. Bingham, B.B. & Noon, B.R. 1997: Mitigation of habitat "take": application to habitat conservation planning. -Conservation Biology 11: 127-139. (Pubitemid 27301242)
8. Bleich, V.C., Marshall, J.P. & Andrew, N.G. 2010: Habitat use by a desert ungulate: predicting effects of water availabilityonmountainsheep. -Journal ofAridEnvironments 74: 638-645.
9. Buchanan, J.B., Fredrickson, R.J. & Seaman, D.E. 1998: Mitigation of habitat "take" and the core area concept. -Conservation Biology 12: 238-240.
10. Burnham, K.P.&Anderson, D.R. 2002:Model selection and multi model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. -Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, 488 pp.
11. Doherty,K.E.,Naugle, D.E.,Walker, B.L.&Graham, J.M. 2008: Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development. -Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 187-195. (Pubitemid 351171963)
12. Frair, J.L.,Merrill, E.H., Visscher, D.R., Fortin, D., Beyer, H.L. & Morales, J.M. 2005: Scales of movement by elk (Cervus elaphus) in response to heterogeneity in forage resources and predation risk. -Landscape Ecology 20: 273-287. (Pubitemid 40886264)
13. Garshelis, D.L. 2000: Delusions in habitat evaluation: measuring use, selection, and importance. -In: Boitani, L. & Fuller, T.K. (Eds.); Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 111-164.
14. Gese, E.M., Ruff, R.L. & Crabtree, R.L. 1996a: Foraging ecology of coyotes (Canis latrans): The influence of extrinsic factors and a dominance hierarchy. -Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 769-783.
15. Gese,E.M.,Ruff, R.L.&Crabtree, R.L. 1996b: Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing coyote predation of small mammals inYellowstoneNational Park. -Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 784-797.
16. Hanks, E.M., Hooten,M.B., Johnson, D.S. & Sterling, J.T. 2011: Velocity-based movement modeling for individual and population level inference. -PLoS One 6: e22795.
17. Hebblewhite, M. & Merrill, E. 2008: Modeling wildlifehuman relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection models. -Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 834-844. (Pubitemid 351614874)
18. Johnson, C.J., Parker, K.L., Heard, D.C. & Gillingham, M.P. 2002: A multi-scale behavioral approach to understanding the movements of woodland caribou. -Ecological Applications 12: 1840-1860. (Pubitemid 36516732)
19. Johnson, C.J., Boyce, M.S., Case, R.L., Cluff, H.D., Gau, R.J., Gunn, A. &Mulders, R. 2005: Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. -Wildlife Monographs 160: 1-36. (Pubitemid 41677413)
20. Jonsen, I.D., Flemming, J.M. & Myers, R.A. 2005: Robust state-spacemodeling of animalmovement data. -Ecology 86: 2874-2880.
21. Lingle, S. 2002: Coyote predation and habitat segregation of white-tailed deer and mule deer. -Ecology 83: 2037-2048. (Pubitemid 36524792)
22. Lo ttker, P., Rummel, A., Traube, M., Stache, A., Sustr, P., Mu ller, J. & Heurich, M. 2009: New possibilities of observing animal behaviour from a distance using activity sensors in GPS-collars: an attempt to calibrate remotely collected activity data with direct behavioural observations in red deer Cervus elaphus. -Wildlife Biology 15(4): 425-434.
23. Manly, B.F., McDonald, L., Thomas, D.L. & Erickson, W.P. 2002: Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies -Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell,Massachusetts, USA, 221 pp.
24. Marzluff, J.M., Millspaugh, J.J. & Knick, S.T. 2001: Hightech behavioural ecology: modeling the distribution of animal activities. -In: Millspaugh, J.J. & Marzluff, J.M. (Eds.);Radio tracking and animal populations.Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 309-326.
25. Matthiopoulos, J.,Hebblewhite,M., Aarts, G.& Fieberg, J. 2011: Generalized functional responses for species distributions. -Ecology 92: 583-589.
26. Mayor, S.J., Schneider, D.C., Schaefer, J.A. & Mahoney, S.P. 2009:Habitat selection atmultiple scales. -Ecoscience 16: 238-247.
27. McLoughlin, P.D., Morris, D.W., Fortin, D., Vander Wal, E. & Contasti, A.L. 2010: Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. -Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 4-12.
28. Moorcroft, P.R., Lewis, M.A. & Crabtree, R.L. 2006: Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. -Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 273: 1651-1659. (Pubitemid 46931052)
29. Moorter, B.M., Visscher, D.R., Jerde, C.L., Frair, J.L. & Merrill, E.H. 2010: Identifying movement states from location data using cluster analysis. -Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 588-594.
30. O'Brien, C.S., Rosenstock, S.S., Hervert, J.J., Bright, J.L. & Boe, S.R. 2005: Landscape-level models of potential habitat for Sonoran pronghorn. -Wildlife SocietyBulletin 33: 24-34. (Pubitemid 40985043)
31. R Development Core Team 2010: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. -R Foundation for StatisticalComputing, Vienna,Austria.Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/(Last accessed on 24 August 2012).
32. Sharma, S., Couturier, S. & Cô té, S.D. 2009: Impacts of climate change on the seasonal distribution of migratory caribou. -Global Change Biology 15: 2549-2562.
33. Shivik, J.A. & Gese, E.M. 2000: Territorial significance of home range estimators for coyotes. -Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 940-946. (Pubitemid 32113743)
34. Van Horne, B. 1983: Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. -Journal ofWildlifeManagement 47: 893-901. (Pubitemid 15272487)
35. Willems, E.P. & Hill, R.A. 2009: Predator-specific landscapes of fear and resource distribution: effects on spatial range use. -Ecology 90: 546-555.
36. Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N.,Walker,N., Saveliev, A.A.& Smith, G.M. 2009: Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R -Springer, New York, New York, USA, 574 pp.