Flashcard: Alternating between visible and invisible identities

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 137-145

  Mitchell, Dymaneke Dinnel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872110878     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10665680500580132     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alston, R. J., & Turner, W. J. (1994). A family strengths model of adjustment to disability for African American clients. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(4), 378-383.
2. Bell, D. (1995). Racial realism-After we're gone: Prudent speculations on America in a post-racial epoch. In R. Degaldo (Ed.), Critical race theory: The cutting edge (pp. 1-8). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Brueggemann, B. (1999). Lend me your ear: Rhetorical constructions of deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
4. Couser, G. T. (2002). Signifying bodies: Life writing and disability studies. In S. Snyder, B. Brueggemann, & R. Garland Thomson (Eds.), Disability studies: Enabling the humanities (pp. 109-117). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
5. Davis, J., & Watson, N. (2001). Countering stereotypes of disability: Disabled children and resistance. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability and postmodernity (pp. 159-174). London: Continuum.
6. Ebert, T. L. (1999). Ludic feminism and after: Postmodernism, desire, and labor in late capitalism. Ann, Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7. Ellison, R. (1980). The invisible man. New York: Random House.
8. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
9. Hammonds, E. (2000). Black (w)holes and the geometry of black female sexuality. InW. Napier (Ed.), African American literary theory: A reader (pp. 482-497). New York: New York University Press.
10. Hanline, M. F., & Daley, S. E. (1992). Family coping strategies and strengths in Hispanic, African American, and Caucasian families of young children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12(3), 351-357.
11. Haraway, D. (1992). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980's. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism (pp. 190-233). New York: Routledge.
12. Hill Collins, P. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
13. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Lott, D. L. (2001). Going to class with (going to class with?) the disabled person: Educators, students, and their spoken and unspoken negotiations. In J. C. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 135-153). Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MI: The University of Massachusetts Press.
16. Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. T. (2000). Narrative prosthesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (2005). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Pilgrim, D. (2002). Jezebel stereotype. Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://www.ferris.edu/htmls/news/jimcrow/jezebel/
19. Price, J., & Shildrick, M. (1998). Uncertain thoughts on the dis/abled body. In M. Shildrick & J. Price (Eds.), Vital signs: Feminist re- configurations of the bio/logical body (pp. 224-249). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
20. Ristock, J. L., & Pennell, J. (1996). Community research as empowerment: Feminist links, postmodern interruptions. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
21. Slee, R. (1996). Disability, class, and poverty: School structures and policing identities. In C. Christensen & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice (pp. 96-118). Buckingham: Open University Press.
22. Smyth, A. (1998). Loving the bones/medi(t)ating my bodies. In M. Shildrick & J. Price (Eds.), Vital signs: Feminist re-configurations of the bio/logical body (pp. 1-12). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
23. Spillers, H. J. (2000). Mama's baby, papa's maybe: An American grammar book. In W. Napier (Ed.), African American literary theory: A reader (pp. 257-279). New York: New York University Press.
24. Thomson, E. (1997). Feminist theory, the body, and disabled figure. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disabilities studies reader (pp. 110-127). New York: Routledge.