Numerical investigation on Direct MLPG for 2D and 3D potential problems

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 183-209

  Mazzia, Annamaria ^a   Pini, Giorgio ^a   Sartoretto, Flavio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Generalized moving least squares; Meshless methods; Poisson problem; Radial basis functions; Tensor product functions

Indexed keywords

GENERALIZED MOVING LEAST SQUARES; MESH-LESS METHODS; POISSON PROBLEM; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; TENSOR PRODUCTS;

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; POISSON EQUATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84872102142     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Atluri, S. N. (2004): The Meshless method (MLPG) for domain & BIE discretizations. Tech Science, 2004, Forsyth GA.
2. Atluri, S. N.; Zhu, T. (2002): The meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method: A simple & less-costly alternative to the finite element methods. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11-51. (Pubitemid 135695145)
3. Babuska, I.; Banerjee, U.; Osborn, J. E. (2005): Survey of meshless and generalized finite element methods: A unified approach. Technical report, Office of Naval Research, One Liberty Center, 875 North Randolph Street Suite 1425, Arlington, VA, 22203-1995, 2005.
4. Belytschko, T.; Krongauz, Y.; Organ, D.; Fleming, M.; Krysl, P. (1996): Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comp. Methods App. Mech. Eng., vol. 139, pp. 3-47. (Pubitemid 126382692)
5. Bergamaschi, L.; Martinez, A.; Pini, G. (2009): An efficient parallel mlpg method for poroelastic models. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 191-216.
6. Buhmann, M. D. (2003): Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementation, volume 12 of Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Duflot, M.; Nguyen-Dang, H. (2002): A truly meshless method based on a moving least squares quadrature. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 18, pp. 441-449. (Pubitemid 34718546)
8. Fasshauer, G. E. (2007): Meshfree approximation methods with MATLAB, volume 6 of Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences. World Scientific Publishing Co., pub-WORLD-SCI:adr. With 1 CD-ROM (Windows, Macintosh and UNIX).
9. Ferronato, M.; Janna, C.; Pini, G. (2012): Shifted FSAI preconditioner for the efficient parallel solution of non-linear groundwater flow models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 89, pp. 1707-1719.
10. Fries, T.-P.; Matthies, H.-G. (2004): Classification and overview of meshfree methods. Technical Report 2003-3, Technical University Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany, 2004.
11. Halton, J. H. (1960): On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer. Math., vol. 2, pp. 84-90.
12. Kershaw, D. S. (1978): The incomplete Cholesky-conjugate gradient method for the iterative solution of systems of linear equations. J. Comp. Phys., vol. 26, pp. 43-65.
13. Lancaster, P.; Salkauskas, K. (1981): Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math. Comp., vol. 37, no. 155, pp. 141-158.
14. Levin, D. (1998): The approximation power of moving least-squares. Math. Comp., vol. 67, no. 234, pp. 1517-1531. (Pubitemid 128383317)
15. Li, S.; Demmel, J.; Gilbert, J.; Grigori, L. (2012): SuperLU. http: //crd-legacy.lbl.gov/~xiaoye/SuperLU/, 2012. Last accessed: September 7, 2012.
16. Liu, G. R. (2009): Meshfree Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method. CRC Press, second edition.
17. Lu, Y. Y.; Belytschko, T.; Gu, L. (1994): A new implementation of the element free Galerkin method. Comp. Methods App. Mech. Eng., vol. 113, pp. 397-414.
18. Mazzia, A.; Pini, G. (2010): Product Gauss quadrature rules vs cubature rules in the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method. Journal of Complexity, vol. 26, pp. 82-101.
19. Mazzia, A.; Pini, G.; Putti, M.; Sartoretto, F. (2003): Comparison of 3D flow fields arising in mixed and standard unstructured finite elements. In et al., P. S.(Ed): Computational Science - ICCS 2003, volume 2657 of Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, pp. 560-567, Berlin. Springer-Verlag.
20. Mazzia, A.; Pini, G.; Sartoretto, F. (2008): Accurate MLPG solution for 3D potential problems. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 43-63.
21. Mazzia, A.; Sartoretto, F. (2010): Meshless solution of potential problems by combining radial basis functions and tensor product ones. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 95-112.
22. Mirzaei, D.; Schaback, R. (2011): Direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (DMLPG) method: a generalized MLS approximation. Preprint, 2011.
23. Mirzaei, D.; Schaback, R. (2012): Solving heat conduction problems by the direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (DMLPG) method. preprint, 2012.
24. Mirzaei, D.; Schaback, R.; Dehghan, M. (2011): On generalized moving least squares and diffuse derivatives. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 983-1000.
25. MUMPS: a MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver. http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/MUMPS, 2012. Last accessed: September 7, 2012.
26. Ni, G.; Ho, S. L.; Yang, S.; Ni, P. (2004): Meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method and its application to electromagnetic field computations. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 111-117.
27. PARDISO solver project. http://www.pardiso-project.org/, 2012. Last accessed: September 7, 2012.
28. Pini, G.; Zilli, G. (1989): Preconditioned iterative algorithms for large sparse unsymmetric problems. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 5, pp. 107-120.
29. Sterk, M.; Trobec, R. (2008): Meshless solution of a diffusion equation with parameter optimization and error analysis. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 32, pp. 567-577. (Pubitemid 351726443)
30. Stroud, A. H. (1971): Approximate Calculation of Multiple Integrals. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
31. Sun, H.;Wang, Y.; Miao, Y. (2008): Meshless numerical method based on tensor product. Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 166-171.
32. van der Vorst, H. A. (1992): Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of BI-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., vol. 13, pp. 631-644.
33. Wagner, G. J.; Liu, W. K. (2001): Hierarchical enrichment for bridging scales and mesh-free boundary conditions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 507-524. (Pubitemid 32138354)
34. Wang, J.; Zhong, W.; Zhang, J. (2006): A general meshsize fourth-order compact difference discretization scheme for 3D Poisson equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 183, no. 2, pp. 804-812. (Pubitemid 46014633)
35. Wu, C.-K. C.; Plesha, M. E. (2002): Essential boundary condition enforcement in meshless methods: boundary flux collocation method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., vol. 53, pp. 499-514. (Pubitemid 34039611)
36. Zhang, J.; Tanaka, M.; Endo, M. (2004): Meshless analysis of potential problems in three dimensions with the hybrid boundary node method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering., vol. 59, pp. 1147-1166. (Pubitemid 38335646)