Family physician enabling attitudes: A qualitative study of patient perceptions

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Hudon, Catherine ^a,b   St Cyr Tribble, Denise ^a   Bravo, Gina ^a   Hogg, William ^c   Lambert, Mireille ^b   Poitras, Marie Eve ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Chicoutimi   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chronic disease; Enablement; Family practice; Patient centred care; Power (psychology); Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CANADA; CHRONIC DISEASE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TRUST;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUEBEC; TRUST;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84872101986     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-8     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Population patterns of chronic health conditions, co-morbidity and healthcare use in Canada: implication for policy and practices. Broemeling A, Watson D, Prebtani F, Healthcare Quaterly 2008 11 70 76
2. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in 'case' management. Starfield B, Lemke KW, Bernhardt T, Foldes SS, Forrest CB, Weiner JP, Ann Fam Med 2003 1 1 8 14 10.1370/afm.1 15043174
3. Empowering discourse in patient education. Virtanen H, Leino-Kilpi H, Salantera S, Patient Educ Couns 2007 66 2 140 146 10.1016/j.pec.2006.12.010 17349769
4. Enablement in healthcare context: a concept analysis. Hudon C, St-Cyr Tribble D, Bravo G, Poitras ME, J Eval Clin Pract 2011 17 143 149 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01413.x 20825534
5. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: toward a theory for community psychology. Rappaport J, Am J Community Psychol 1987 15 121 148 10.1007/BF00919275 3604997
6. Ottawa charter for health promotion. First international conference on health promotion http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa-charter-hp.pdf
7. World Health Organization. Europe, What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health? http://www.euro.who.int/-data/assets/pdf-file/ 0010/74656/E88086.pdf
8. Empowerment interventions, knowledge translation and exchange: perspectives of home care professionals, clients and caregivers. St-Cyr Tribble D, Gallagher F, Bell L, Caron C, Godbout P, Leblanc J, Morin P, Xhignesse M, Voyer L, Couture M, BMC Health Serv Res 2008 8 177 10.1186/1472-6963-8-177 18713474
9. Patient perception of the GP role in cancer management. Bulsara C, Ward A, Joske D, Aust Fam Physician 2005 34 299 300 15861760
10. How do people with cancer wish to be cared for in primary care? Serial discussion groups of patients and carers. Kendall M, Boyd K, Campbell C, Cormie P, Fife S, Thomas K, Fam Pract 2006 23 6 644 650 10.1093/fampra/cml035 16837479
11. Quality issues in the treatment of depression in general practice. Gilmore KA, Hargie O, Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2000 13 34 41 10.1108/09526860010311071
12. Experience of fibromyalgia. Raymond MC, Brown JB, Qualitative study. Can Fam Physician 2000 46 1100 1106
13. Patient-provider interaction from the perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients in Muscat, Oman: a qualitative study. Abdulhadi N, Al Shafaee M, Freudenthal S, Ostenson CG, Wahlstrom R, BMC Health Serv Res 2007 7: 162.
14. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Sandelowski M, Res Nurs Health 2000 23 334 340 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0. CO;2-G 10940958
15. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Sandelowski M, Res Nurs Health 2010 33 77 84 20014004
16. Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Doing qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc 1999
17. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Lapointe L, Ann Fam Med 2005 3 223 228 10.1370/afm.272 15928225
18. Estimating disease prevalence using a population-based administrative healthcare database. Wiréhn AB, Karlsson HM, Carstensen JM, Scand J Public Health 2007 35 424 431 10.1080/14034940701195230 17786807
19. Kvale S, Interviews. An introduction to qualitative research interviewing Thousand Oaks: Sage 1996
20. L'entretien de type qualitatif: considérations épistémologiques, théoriques et méthodologiques. [The qualitative interview: Epistemological, theoritical and methodological considerations]. Poupart J, La recherche qualitative Enjeux épisté mologiques et méthodologiques [Qualitative research: Epistemological and methodological challenges] Montreal: Gaëtan Morin, Poupart J, Groulx LH, Deslauriers JP, Laperrière A, Mayer R, Pires AP, 1997 173 209
21. Valid arguments? A consideration of the concept of validity in establishing the credibility of research findings. Avis M, J Adv Nurs 1995 22 1203 1209 8675876
22. Subjectivity and reflexivity in the social sciences: epistemic windows and methodical consequences. Breuer F, Roth W-M, Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2003 4 25 Available at http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/ fqs/article/view/698/1510
23. Patient-centered care in chronic disease management: a thematic analysis of the literature in family medicine. Hudon C, Fortin M, Haggerty J, Loignon C, Lambert M, Poitras M-E, Patient Educ Couns 2012 88 170 176 10.1016/j.pec.2012. 01.009 22360841
24. Miles MB, Huberman MA, Analyse des données qualitatives Bruxelles: De Boeck 2e 2003
25. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Braun V, Clarke V, Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006 3 77 101 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
26. Creswell JW, Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches Tousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc. 3 2009
27. A comfortable relationship: a patient-derived dimension of ongoing care. Pandhi N, Bowers B, Chen FP, Fam Med 2007 39 4 266 273 17401771
28. Loyalty to the regular care provider: patients' and physicians' views. Roberge D, Beaulieu MD, Haddad S, Lebeau R, Pineault R, Fam Pract 2001 18 1 53 59 10.1093/fampra/18.1.53 11145629
29. Preferences of patients for patient-centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Gould C, Ferrier K, Payne S, BMJ 2001 322 468 472 10.1136/bmj.322.7284. 468 11222423
30. Holding relationships in primary care: a qualitative study of doctors' and patients' perceptions. Cocksedge S, Greenfield R, Nugent GK, Chew-Graham C, Br J Gen Pract 2011 61 506 507
31. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Thompson AG, Soc Sci Med 2007 64 1297 1310 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002 17174016
32. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Pavlic DR, Raposo V, Baker R, Patient Educ Couns 2007 68 33 42 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025 17544239
33. Physicians' perceptions of barriers to cardiovascular disease risk factor control among patients with diabetes: results from the translating research into action for diabetes (TRIAD) study. Crosson JC, Heisler M, Subramanian U, Swain B, Davis GJ, Lasser N, Ross S, Schmittdiel JA, Onyemere K, Tseng CW, J Am Board Fam Med 2010 23 2 171 178 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090125 20207927
34. Patient-physician trust: an exploratory study. Thom DH, Campbell B, J Fam Pract 1997 44 2 169 176 9040520
35. Using the patient-centered method to achieve excellence in care for women with breast cancer. Brown J, Stewart M, McWilliam CL, Patient Educ Couns 1999 38 2 121 129 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00059-2 14528704
36. Faciliting narrative medical discussions of type 1 diabetes with computer visualizations and photography. Smith BK, Frost J, Albayrak M, Sudhakar R, Patient Educ Couns 2006 64 313 321 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.011 16859870
37. Evaluation of a patient-centered approach in generalized musculoskeletal chronic pain/fibromyalgia patients in primary care. Alamo MM, Moral RR, Perula de Torres LA, Patient Educ Couns 2002 48 23 31 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00095-2 12220747
38. Empowerment: reformulation of a non-Rogerian concept. Crawford Shearer NB, Reed PG, Nurs Sci Q 2004 17 253 259 10.1177/0894318404266325 15200729
39. Empowering counselling-a case study: nurse-patient encounter in a hospital. Kettunen T, Poskiparta M, Liimatainen L, Health Educ Res 2001 16 227 238 10.1093/her/16.2.227 11345664
40. Attitudes toward patient expertise in chronic illness. Thorne SE, Ternulf Nyhlin K, Paterson BL, Int J Nurs Stud 2000 37 4 303 311 10760537
41. End-of-life care: guidelines for patient-centered communication. Ngo-Metzger Q, August KJ, Srinivasan M, Liao S, Meyskens FL, Am Fam Physician 2008 77 2 167 174 18246886
42. Principles of palliative care medicine part 1: patient assessment. Douglas AB, Maxwell TL, Whitecar PS, Adv Stud Med 2004 4 1 15 20
43. Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know? Butow PN, Dowsett S, Hagerty R, Tattersall MH, Support Care Cancer 2002 10 2 161 168 10.1007/s005200100290 11862506
44. Understanding physicians' skills at providing end-of-life care perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers. Curtis JR, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Shannon SE, Ambrozy DM, Ramsey PG, J Gen Intern Med 2001 16 1 41 49 11251749
45. Why don't patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell ES, Collier AC, Arch Intern Med 2000 160 11 1690 1696 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1690 10847263