Internet guidance in oncology practice: Determinants of health professionals' Internet referral behavior

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 74-82

  Emond, Yvette ^a   De Groot, Jos ^b   Wetzels, Wendy ^b   Van Osch, Liesbeth ^a,c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Centre   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

cancer; health professionals; internet; oncology; patient education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NURSE; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTENTION; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEOPLASMS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84872085333     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.2056     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, Blanchard EB,. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27: 1139-1145.
2. Chen X, Siu LL,. Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 4291-4297.
3. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J,. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 48-51.
4. Jefford M, Tattersall MHN,. Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3: 629-637.
5. Norum J, Grev A, Moen M, Balteskard L, Holthe K,. Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients' and relatives' experiences and suggestions. Support Care Cancer 2003; 11: 286-293.
6. Derdiarian AK,. Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients. Nurs Res 1986; 35: 276-281.
7. Eysenbach G,. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53: 356-380.
8. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The Impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5 (3): e17.
9. Van Rijen AJG,. Internetgebruiker en kiezen van zorg [Internet user and Selection of Care]. Raad voor Volksgezondheid en Zorg: Zoetermeer, 2003.
10. Mills ME, Sullivan K,. The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 1999; 8: 631-642.
11. Tang PC, Newcomb C, Gordon S, Kreider N,. Meeting the Information Needs of Patients: Results from a Patient Focus Group. Proc AMIA Symp, 1997; 672-676.
12. Gerber BS, Eiser AR,. The patient-physician relationship in the Internet Age: future prospects and the research agenda. J Med Internet Res 2001; 3 (2): e15.
13. Van Eenbergen MCHJ, Van de Poll-Franse LV, Van Driel H,. Internetgebruik door kankerpatiënten [Internet Use by Cancer Patients]. IKRBulletin 2007; 39-42.
14. Van de Poll-Franse LV, Van Eenbergen MCHJ,. Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 1189-1195.
15. Edgar L, Greenberg A, Remmer J,. Providing Internet lessons to oncology patients and family members: a shared project. Psycho-Oncology 2002; 11: 439-446.
16. Potts HWW, Wyatt JC,. Survey of doctors' experience of patients using the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4 (1): e5.
17. Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Grenfield, MLVH, Baker LH,. Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer 1999; 86: 381-390.
18. Laing A, Hogg G, Winkelman D,. Healthcare and the information revolution: re-configuring the healthcare service encounter. Health Serv Manage Res 2004; 17: 188-199.
19. Diaz JA, Sciamanna CN, Evangelou E, Stamp MJ, Ferguson T,. Brief report: what types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 683-685.
20. Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale AV,. Patients' Use of the Internet for Health Information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 39-45.
21. De Vries H, Lezwijn J, Hol M, Honing C,. Skin cancer prevention: behavior and motives of Dutch adolescents. Eur J Cancer Prev 2005; 14: 39-50.
22. De Vries H, Mesters I, Van de Steeg H, Honing C,. The general public's information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model. Patient Educ Couns 2005; 56: 154-165.
23. Hoving C, Mudde AN, De Vries H,. Intention to implement a smoking cessation intervention in Dutch general practice. Health Educ 2007; 107: 307-315.
24. Knops-Dullens T, De Vries N, De Vries H,. Reasons for non-attendance in cervical cancer screening programmes: an application of the integrated model for behavioral change. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007; 16: 436-445.
25. Panday S, Reddy SP, Ruiter RAC, Bergström E, De Vries H,. Determinants of smoking cessation among adolescents in South Africa. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 586-599.
26. Segaar D, Willemsen MC, Bolman C, De Vries, H,. Nurse adherence to a minimal-contact smoking cessation intervention on cardiac wards. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30: 429-444.
27. Van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, De Nooijer J, De Vries H,. Passive cancer detection and medical help seeking for cancer symptoms: (in) adequate behavior and pychosocial determinants. Eur J Cancer Prev 2007; 16: 266-274.
28. Segaar D, Bolman C, Willemsen MC, De Vries H,. Identifying determinants of protocol adoption by midwives: a comprehensive approach. Health Educ Res 2007; 22: 14-26.
29. Segaar D, Bolman C, Willemsen MC, De Vries H,. Determinants of adoption of cognitive behavioral interventions in a hospital setting: example of a minimal-contact smoking cessation intervention for cardiology wards. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 61: 262-271.
30. Légaré F, Graham ID, OÇonner AC, et al,. Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice. Health Expect 2007; 10: 364-379.
31. Vogt F, Hall S, Marteau TM,. General practitioners' and family physicians' negative beliefs and attitudes towards discussing smoking cessation with patients: a systematic review. Addiction 2005; 100: 1423-1431.
32. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al,. Why don't physicians follow clinical guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-1467.
33. Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W,. Are physicians ready for patients with Internet-based health information? J Med Internet Res 2006; 8 (3): e22.
34. Helft PR, Hlubocky F, Daugherty K,. American oncologists' views of Internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology Members. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 942-947.
35. Koller M, Grütter R, Peltenburg M, Fischer JE, Steurer J,. Use of the Internet by medical doctors in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2001; 131: 251-254.
36. De Vries H, Backbier E, Kok G, Dijkstra M,. The impact of social influences in the context of attitude, self-efficacy, intention and previous behavior as predictors of smoking onset. J Appl Soc Psychol 1995; 25: 237-257.
37. Ajzen I,. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991; 50: 179-211.