A systematic analysis of small supernumerary marker chromosomes using array CGH exposes unexpected complexity

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-13

  Reddy, Kavita S ^a   Aradhya, Swaroop ^b   Meck, Jeanne ^b   Tiller, George ^a   Abboy, Sridevi ^a   Bass, Harold ^a  

^a Medical Genetics and Genomics Laboratory   (United States)

^b GENEDX   (United States)

Author keywords

array CGH; complex marker chromosomes

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME 19Q; CHROMOSOME 20; CHROMOSOME 5P; CHROMOSOME 5Q; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME DUPLICATION; CHROMOSOME MARKER; CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; EUCHROMATIN; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; LEARNING DISORDER; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; REVIEW; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SMALL SUPERNUMERARY MARKER CHROMOSOME; SPEECH DISORDER; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRISOMY;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC MARKERS; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; MOSAICISM; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84872055728     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.78     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Liehr T, Weise A. Frequency of small supernumerary marker chromosomes in prenatal, newborn, developmentally retarded and infertility diagnostics. Int J Mol Med 2007;19:719-731.
2. Graf MD, Christ L, Mascarello JT, et al. Redefining the risks of prenatally ascertained supernumerary marker chromosomes: a collaborative study. J Med Genet 2006;43:660-664.
3. Stankiewicz P, Bocian E, Jakubów-Durska K, et al. Identification of supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 5, 6, 19, and 20 using FISH. J Med Genet 2000;37:114-120.
4. Baldwin EL, May LF, Justice AN, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH. Mechanisms and consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosomes: from Barbara McClintock to modern genetic-counseling issues. Am J Hum Genet 2008;82:398-410.
5. Callen DF, Freemantle CJ, Ringenbergs ML, et al. The isochromosome 18p syndrome: confirmation of cytogenetic diagnosis in nine cases by in situ hybridization. Am J Hum Genet 1990;47:493-498.
6. Crolla JA, Harvey JF, Sitch FL, Dennis NR. Supernumerary marker 15 chromosomes: a clinical, molecular and FISH approach to diagnosis and prognosis. Hum Genet 1995;95:161-170.
7. Huang B, Crolla JA, Christian SL, et al. Refined molecular characterization of the breakpoints in small inv dup(15) chromosomes. Hum Genet 1997;99:11-17.
8. Eggermann K, Mau UA, Bujdosó G, et al. Supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 15: analysis of 32 new cases. Clin Genet 2002;62:89-93.
9. Mears AJ, el-Shanti H, Murray JC, McDermid HE, Patil SR. Minute supernumerary ring chromosome 22 associated with cat eye syndrome: further delineation of the critical region. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57: 667-673.
10. Trifonov V, Fluri S, Binkert F, et al. Complex rearranged small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC), three new cases; evidence for an underestimated entity? Mol Cytogenet 2008;15:1-6.
11. Vetro A, Manolakos E, Petersen MB, et al. Unexpected results in the constitution of small supernumerary marker chromosomes. Eur J Med Genet 2012;55:185-190.
12. Yu S, Fiedler SD, Brawner SJ, Joyce JM, Zhou XG, Liu HY. Characterizing small supernumerary marker chromosomes with combination of multiple techniques. Cytogenet Genome Res 2012;136:6-14.
13. Liehr T. sSMC homepage. 2005. http://www.med.uni-jena.de/fish/sSMC/ 00START.htm.
14. Melo JB, Backx L, Vermeesch JR, et al. Chromosome 5 derived small supernumerary marker: towards a genotype/phenotype correlation of proximal chromosome 5 imbalances. J Appl Genet 2011;52: 193-200.
15. Schinzel A. Catalogue of Unbalanced Chromosome Aberrations in Man, 2nd edn. DeGruyter: New York, 2001.
16. OMIM (Online Mendelian inheritance in man). Johns Hopkins University, Center for Medical Genetics: Baltimore, 1996. http://omim.org/entry/192500.
17. GeneReviews. http://www.genetests.org.
18. Inherited arrhythimas database. http://www.fsm.it/cardmoc/,Human Genome Mutation Database; https://portal.biobase international.com/hgmd/pro/search- gene.php?.
19. Stratton RF, DuPont BR, Olsen AS, Fertitta A, Hoyer M, Moore CM. Interstitial duplication 19p. Am J Me.d Genet 1995;57:562-564.
20. Novelli A, Ceccarini C, Bernardini L, et al. Pure trisomy 19p syndrome in an infant with an extra ring chromosome. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005;111:182-185.
21. Liehr T. SMC homepage. 2006. http://www.med.unijena.de/fish/ssmc/00start. htm.
22. Vranekovic J, Brajenovic-Milic B, Modrusan-Mozetic Z, Babic I, Kapovic M. Severe psychomotor retardation in a boy with a small supernumerary marker chromosome 19p. Cytogenet Genome Res 2008;121:298-301.
23. Lehman AM, du Souich C, Chai D, et al. 19p13.2 microduplication causes a Sotos syndrome-like phenotype and alters gene expression. Clin Genet 2012;81:56-63.
24. Quack B, Van Roy N, Verschraegen-Spae MR, Klein F. Interstitial deletion and ring chromosome derived from 19q. Proximal 19q trisomy phenotype. Ann Genet 1992;35:241-244.
25. Zung A, Rienstein S, Rosensaft J, Aviram-Goldring A, Zadik Z. Proximal 19q trisomy: a new syndrome of morbid obesity and mental retardation. Horm Res 2007;67:105-110.
26. Davidsson J, Jahnke K, Forsgren M, et al. dup(19)(q12q13.2): array-based genotype-phenotype correlation of a new possibly obesity-related syndrome. Obesity 2010;18:580-587.
27. Hall CE, Cunningham JJ, Hislop RG, Berg JN. A boy with supernumerary mosaic trisomy 19q, involving 19q13.11-19q13.2, with macrocephaly, obesity and mild facial dysmorphism. Clin Dysmorphol 2010;19: 218-221.
28. Oda T, Elkahloun AG, Meltzer PS, et al. Identification of a larger than 3 Mb deletion including JAG1 in an Alagille syndrome patient with a translocation t(3;20)(q13.3;p12.2). Hum Mutat 2000;16:92.
29. Database of Genomic Variants. http://projects.tcag.ca/variation.
30. Wanderley HY, Schrander-Stumpel CT, Visser MO, Van Maanen-Op Het Roodt EA, Loneus WH, Engelen JJ. Report of a patient with a trisomy of chromosome region 20q11.2-20q12 and characterization with FISH. Genet Couns 2005;16:277-282.
31. Guediche N, Brisset S, Benichou JJ, et al. Chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two supernumerary ring chromosomes 20. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152:464-471.
32. Callen DF, Eyre HJ, Ringenbergs ML, Freemantle CJ, Woodroffe P, Haan EA. Chromosomal origin of small ring marker chromosomes in man: characterization by molecular genetics. Am J Hum Genet 1991;48:769-782.
33. Blennow E, Annerén G, Bui TH, Berggren E, Asadi E, Nordenskjöld M. Characterization of supernumerary ring marker chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet 1993;53: 433-442.
34. Batista DA, Escallon C, Blakemore KJ, Stetten G. An accessory marker derived from chromosome 20 and its co-existence with a mosaic trisomy 20 cell line. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:123-127.
35. van Langen IM, Otter MA, Aronson DC, et al. Supernumerary ring chromosome 20 characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clin Genet 1996;49:49-53.
36. Viersbach R, Engels H, Schwanitz G. Identification of supernumerary der(20) chromosomes by FISH in three patients. Am J Med Genet 1997;70:278-283.
37. Crolla JA, Long F, Rivera H, Dennis NR. FISH and molecular study of autosomal supernumerary marker chromosomes excluding those derived from chromosomes 15 and 22: I. Results of 26 new cases. Am J Med Genet 1998;75:355-366.
38. Austin-Ward ED, Castillo S, Dragnic Y, Sanz P, Salazar S, Knoll JH. Clinical findings in a patient mosaic for a supernumerary ring chromosome 20. Am J Med Genet 2000;91:171-174.
39. Pinto MR, Fonseca e Silva ML, Aguiar J, Quelhas I, Lima MR. Supernumerary ring chromosome 20 in a mother and her child. Am J Med Genet A 2005;133A:193-196.
40. Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Manolakos E, Lagou M, et al. Characterization of a prenatally assessed de novo supernumerary minute ring chromosome 20 in a phenotypically normal male. Mol Cytogenet 2009;2:1.
41. Callier P, Faivre L, Pigeonnat S, et al. Contribution of array CGH in prognosis and genetic counselling of prenatally diagnosed supernumerary ring chromosome 20. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:1002-1005.
42. Kamath BM, Thiel BD, Gai X, et al. SNP array mapping of chromosome 20p deletions: genotypes, phenotypes, and copy number variation. Hum Mutat 2009;30:371-378.
43. Batanian JR, Huang Y, Gottesman GS, Grange DK, Blasingame AV. Preferential involvement of the short arm in chromosome 8-derived supernumerary markers and ring as identified by chromosome arm painting. Am J Med Genet 2000;90:276-282.
44. Anderlid BM, Sahlén S, Schoumans J, et al. Detailed characterization of 12 supernumerary ring chromosomes using micro-FISH and search for uniparental disomy. Am J Med Genet 2001;99:223-233.
45. Brecevic L, Michel S, Starke H, et al. Multicolor FISH used for the characterization of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in commercially available immortalized cell lines. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006;114:319-324.
46. Liehr T, Ewers E, Hamid AB, et al. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes and uniparental disomy have a story to tell. J Histochem Cytochem 2011;59:842-848.
47. Luedi PP, Dietrich FS, Weidman JR, Bosko JM, Jirtle RL, Hartemink AJ. Computational and experimental identification of novel human imprinted genes. Genome Res 2007;17:1723-1730.
48. Gruchy N, Lebrun M, Herlicoviez M, et al. Supernumerary marker chromosomes management in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A:2770-2776.
49. Tsuchiya KD, Opheim KE, Hannibal MC, et al. Unexpected structural complexity of supernumerary marker chromosomes characterized by microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Cytogenet 2008;1:71-11.