Imaging techniques in breast cancer

Surgery (United Kingdom)

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-21

  Bansal, Gaurav Jyoti ^a   Thomas, K G ^b   Lim, Karene ^c  

^a LLANDOUGH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL GLAMORGAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biopsy techniques; mammography; MRI; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER AIDED BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION MAMMOGRAPHY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84872046230     PISSN: 02639319     EISSN: 18781764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2012.10.011     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. D.B. Kopans Beyond randomised control trials: organised mammographic screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality Cancer 94 2002 580 581
2. Guidance on screening and symptomatic breast imaging 2003 Royal College of Radiologists 1 872599 85 0 RCR ref BFCR(03)2
3. U. Fischer, F. Baum, and S. Obenauer Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography Eur Radiol 12 2002 2679 2683
4. R.G. Blanks, M.G. Wallis, and S.M. Moss A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme J Med Screen 5 1998 195 201
5. R.L. Birdwell, D.M. Ikeda, K.F. O'Shaughnessy, and E.A. Sickles Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection Radiol 219 2001 192 202
6. A.S. Hong, E.L. Rosen, M.S. Soo, and J.A. Baker BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive value of sonographic features Am J Roentgenol 184 2005 1260 1265
7. N. Houssami, S. Ciatto, R.M. Turner, H.S. Cody 3rd, and P. Macaskill Pre-operative ultrasound guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer-meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging of axilla Ann Surg 254 2011 243 251
8. C.K. Kuhl, P. Mielcareck, and S. Klaschik Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiol 211 1999 101 110
9. D.P. Gorczyca, S. Sinha, and C.Y. Ahn Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging Radiol 185 1992 407 410
10. P.J. Kneeshaw, L.W. Turnbull, A. Smith, and P.J. Drew Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging aids the surgical management of invasive lobular breast cancer Eur J Surg Oncol 29 2003 32 37
11. R.M.L. Warren, L.G. Bobrow, and H.M. Earl Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Br J Cancer 90 2004 1349 1360
12. The classification and care of women at high risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care, an update National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence July 2006 CG 41
13. D. Clarke, N.I. Khonji, and R.E. Mansel Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: ALMANAC Trial World J Surg 25 2001 819 822
14. U. Veronesi, G. Paganelli, and G. Viale A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 2003 546 553
15. 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis J Nucl Med 42 2001 9 16