Academic faculty in university research centers: Neither capitalism's slaves nor teaching fugitives

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 88-120

  Bozeman, Barry ^a   Boardman, Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872035372     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2013.0003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Agrawal A., & henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48,44-60.
2. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2006).The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output (WorkingPaper#11917).National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
3. Baldini, N. (2008). Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence. Scientome trics, 75(2), 289-311.
4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
5. Boardman, C. (2009).Government centrality in university industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy, 38,1505-1516.
6. Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B.(2007).Roles training university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(4), 430-463.
7. Boardman, C., & Corley, E.(2008). University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy, 37,900-913.
8. Boardman, C., & Gray, D.(2010).The new science and engineering management: Cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5),445-459.
9. Boardman, C., & Ponomariov, B.(2007). Reward systems and NSf university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1),51-70.
10. Bouty, I. (2000). Inter personal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal, 43(1),50-65.
11. Bowen, H.R., & Schuster, J.H. (1986).American professors: A national resource imperiled. Newyork: Oxford University Press.
12. Boyer, E.L.(1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
13. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C.(2003).Managing the new multipurpose, multi discipline university research center: Institutional innovation in the academic community. Washington, D.C.: I BM Endowment for the Business of Government.
14. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2004). The NSf engineering research centers and the university industry research revolution. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 365-375.
15. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J., & Gaughan, M.(2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7-8),636-655.
16. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impact so grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36,694-707.
17. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154-186.
18. Braxton, J.M. (1996). Public trust, research activity, and the ideal of service to students as clients of teaching. In J.B. Braxton, (Ed.), Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict? (pp.1-22). New Directions of Institutional Research, No.90. Sanfrancisco: JosseyBass.
19. Breschi S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2005). From publishing to patenting: Do productive scientists turn into academic inventors? Revue d' Economie Industrielle, 110 (2), 75-102.
20. Bush, V.(1945).Science: The endless frontier. Washington DC: United States Government Printing Office.
21. Cage, M.C. (1991). States questioning how much time professors spend working with undergraduate students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 37,1-20.
22. Carnegie foundation. (2000). Classification of higher education. http://www.carnegiefoundtion.org/Classifcation/index.htm.
23. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organisational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Per gamon/Elsevier Science.
24. Coburn, C.(1995). Partnerships. Columbus, Ohio:BattellePress.
25. Corley, E., Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B.(2006).Design and the management of multi institutional research collaborations. Research Policy, 35,975-993.
26. Corley, E., & Gaughan, M.(2005). Scientists' participation in university research centers: What are the gender differences? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4),371-381.
27. Diamond, R.M.(1993). Instituting change in the faculty reward system. New Directions for Higher Education, 81, 13-22.
28. Diamond, R.M.(1999).Aligning faculty rewards with institutional mission: Statements, policies, and guidelines. Boston: Anker.
29. th ed.). Detroit: GaleResearch.
30. Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms o f entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(2),109-123.
31. feldman, K.A.(1987).Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26(3),227-298.
32. Gaughan, M., & Corley, E.A.(2010).Science faculty at U.S. research universities: The impacts of university research center affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30, 215-222.
33. Grant, R.M. (1996).Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4),375-387.
34. Green, S.G.(1983). Identifability of spurious factors using linear factor analysis with binary items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(2), 139-147.
35. Hackett, E. J. (2001).Science as a vocation in the1990s: The changing organizational cultures of academic science. In J. Croissant& S. Restivo (Eds.), Degrees of compromise: Industrial interests and academic values (pp.101-138).Albany: State University of Newyork Press.
36. Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N., & vonortas, N.S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29,567-586.
37. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., & Trajtenberg, M.(1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-88. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80,119-132.
38. Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology, 74-75.
39. Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S. (1995). Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6(4), 373-391.
40. Iansiti, M. (1995).Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment. Research Policy, 24(4),521-542.
41. krimsky, S.(2003). Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? Lanham, Maryland: Row man and Little field Publishers.
42. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005).The impact of research collaboration on scientifc productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
43. Lee, Y. (1996). "Technology transfer"and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6),843-863.
44. Lin, M., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university industry research centers: A" scientific and technical human capital"explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2),269-290.
45. Link, A., & Scott, J.T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106-1112.
46. Link, A.N., Swann, C., & Bozeman, B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4),363-374.
47. Massy, W., & Zemsky, R. (1994).Faculty discretionary time: Departments and the academic ratchet. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 1-22.
48. Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor authors with their non inventing peersinnano science and technology. Research Policy, 35,1646-1662.
49. Milem, J.F., Berger, J.B., & Dey, E.L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(4),454-475.
50. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1),99-119.
51. Mowery, D.C., & Ziedonis, A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3),399-418.
52. National Institutes of health.(2009). Office of the Director (Description). Retrieved from http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/index.htm.
53. Ponomariov, B. (2008). Effects of university characteristics on scientists' interactions with the private sector: An exploratory assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5),485-503.
54. Ponomariov, B. (2009). Student centrality in university industry interactions. Industry and Higher Education, 23,50-62.
55. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39(5),613-624.
56. Rogers, E.M., Takegami, S., & yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4),253-261.
57. Ruscio, K.P.(1984).The changing context of academic science: University industry relations in biotechnology and the public policy implications. Policy Studies Review, 4(2), 259-275.
58. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Folleman, M.H., & Morgan, E. (2002) The "traffc" in graduate students: Graduate students a stokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(2),282-313.
59. Slaughter, S. & Leslie, L.L.(1997).Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: John shopkins University Press.
60. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1996). The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21,303-339.
61. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004).Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore: John shopkins University Press.
62. Stokes, D.(1997).Pasteur's quadrant. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
63. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48,90-104.
64. vanLooy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behaviour of academic researchers: Conflicting, re in forcing or merely coexisting? Research Policy, 35,596-608.
65. Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entre preneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew effect? Research Policy, 33,425-441.
66. Van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K., & vandeberg, R.L.J. (2008). Are source based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37,1255-1266.
67. Welsh, R., Glenn, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough butnot too far: Assessing the effects of university industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37,1255-1266.
68. Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regressionanalysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23,230-257.
69. youtie, J., Libaers, D., & Bozeman, B.(2006).Institutionalization of university research centers:The case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research. Technovation, 26(9),1055-1063.