Breast compression in mammography: Pressure distribution patterns

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 973-980

  Dustler, Magnus ^a   Andersson, Ingvar ^b   Brorson, Hakan ^c   Frojd, Patrik ^a   Mattsson, Soren ^a   Tingberg, Anders ^a   Zackrisson, Sophia ^b   Fornvik, Daniel ^a  

^a Medical Radiation Physics   (Sweden)

^b Diagnostic Centre of Imaging and Functional Medicine   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adults; Breast; Mammography; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ABSORBED DOSE; ADULTS; BREAST; COMPRESSION FORCE; FORCE SENSING RESISTOR; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MEAN PRESSURES; OPTIMAL COMPRESSION; PRESSURE PATTERNS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; TISSUE COMPONENTS; VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE;

COMPACTION; DATA COMPRESSION; MAMMOGRAPHY; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION; TISSUE;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRESSURE; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE;

EID: 84872030707     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.120238     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: Updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359:909-19
2. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, et al. Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 2003;361:1405-10
3. Saunders RS Jr, Samei E. The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. Med Phys 2008;35:4464-73
4. Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P, et al. Psychosocial predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 1999;6:82-8
5. Miller D, Livingstone V, Herbison P. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD002942
6. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition - summary document. Ann Oncol 2008;19:614-22
7. Poulos A, McLean D. The application of breast compression in mammography: A new perspective. Radiography 2004;10:131-7
8. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998;20:260-74
9. Fornvik D, Andersson I, Svahn T, et al. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: Human observer study using clinical cases. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139:118-23
10. Thilander Klang A. Diagnostic Quality and Absorbed Dose in Mammography. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; 1997
11. Russell DG, Ziewacz JT. Pressures in a simulated breast subjected to compression forces comparable to those of mammography. Work in Progress. Radiology 1995;194:383-7
12. Azar FS, Metaxas DN, Schnall MD. A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Acad Radiol 2001;8:965-75
13. Zyganitidis C, Bliznakova K, Pallikarakis N. A novel simulation algorithm for soft tissue compression. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45:661-9
14. Chung JH, Rajagopal V, Nielsen PM, et al. Modelling Mammographic Compression of the Breast. In: Metaxas DN, Axel L, Fichtinger G, et al., eds. MICCAI '08 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Part II. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008:758-6
15. Chen B, Shorey J, Saunders RS Jr, et al. An anthropomorphic breast model for breast imaging simulation and optimization. Acad Radiol 2011;18:536-46
16. Clark DJ, Chambers IR, Faulkner K, et al. Pressure measurements during automatic breast compression in mammography. J Biomed Eng 1990;12:444-6
17. Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976;31:1191-8
18. Luo ZP, Berglund LJ, An KN. Validation of F-Scan pressure sensor system: A technical note. J Rehabil Res Dev 1998; 35:186-91
19. Wilson DR, Eichler MJ, Hayes WC. Accuracy of the Iscan Pressure Measurement System. In: RTO meeting proceedings 56 - Soldier Mobility: Innovations in Load Carriage System Design and Evaluation. Ottawa/Hull: St Joseph, 2001:247-50
20. Bachus KN, DeMarco AL, Judd KT, et al. Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: Using Fuji Film and TekScan systems. Med Eng Phys 2006;28:483-8
21. Morin EL, Bryant JT, Reid SA, et al. Calibration Issues of Tekscan Systems For Human Pressure Assessment. In: RTO meeting proceedings 56 - Soldier Mobility: Innovations in Load Carriage System Design and Evaluation. Ottawa/Hull: St Joseph, 2001:251-7
22. Tekscan. Pressure and Force Measurement Technology. See http://www. tekscan.com/sensor-technology
23. European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Brussels, 1996 EUR 16260
24. Eklund GW, Cardenosa G. The art of mammographic positioning. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:21-53
25. Eklund GW, Cardenosa G, Parsons W. Assessing adequacy of mammographic image quality. Radiology 1994;190:297-307
26. D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
27. Dexter F, Chestnut DH. Analysis of Statistical Tests to Compare Visual Analog Scale Measurements among Groups. Anesthesiology 1995;82:896-902