Anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite vs b-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation: A comparative histomorphometric study

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 38, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages 519-526

  Kurkcu, Mehmet ^a   Benlidayi, M Emre ^a   Cam, Burcu ^a   Sertdemir, Yasar ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Anorganic bovine derived hydroxyapatite; Beta tricalcium phosphate; Histomorphometry; Sinus augmentation

Indexed keywords

BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; MINERAL;

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE REGENERATION; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CALCIUM PHOSPHATES; CATTLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYDROXYAPATITES; JAW, EDENTULOUS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLA; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MINERALS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOGENESIS; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84872023438     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00061     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613-616.
2. Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30:207-222.
3. Jensen SS, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:11-45.
4. Block MS, Kent JN. Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the use of autogenous bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1281-1286.
5. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;51:857-862.
6. Pejrone G, Lorenzetti M, Mozzati M, Valente G, Schierona GM. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous iliac bone block grafts: a histological and histomorphometrical report on the twostep surgical technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:383-388.
7. Younger EM, Chapman MW. Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 1989;3:192-195.
8. Kalk WWL, Raghoebar GM, Jansma J, Boering G. Morbidity from iliac crest bone harvesting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54: 1424-1429.
9. Tadjoedin ES, de Lange GL, Lyaruu DM, Kuiper L, Burger EH. High concentrations of bioactive glass material (BioGran) vs. autogenous bone for sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res.2002;13:428-436.
10. Quinones CR, Hurzeler MB, Schupbach P, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II: evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8: 487-496.
11. Szabo G, Suba Z, Hrabak K, Barabas J, Nemeth Z. Autogenous bone versus beta tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevations (2- and 3-dimensional computed tomographic, histologic, and histomorphometric observations): preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:681-692.
12. Szabo G, Huys L, Coulthard P, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial of autogenous bone versus b-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevation: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:371-381.
13. Zerbo IR, Zijderveld SA, de Boer A, et al. Histomorphometry of human sinus floor augmentation using a porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15: 724-732.
14. Zijderveld SA, Zerbo IR, van den Bergh JP, Schulten EA, ten Bruggenkate CM. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a betatricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb) alone compared to autogenous bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:432-440.
15. Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsch A, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:476-486.
16. Valentini P, Abensur DJ. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:556-560.
17. Y?ld?r?m M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood: a histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res.2000;11:217-229.
18. Haas R, Donath K, Fö dinger M, Watzek G. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:107-116.
19. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, Icaro Cornaglia A, Tesei P, Cattaneo V. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss): a case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14: 369-372.
20. Benlidayi ME, Kurkcu M, Oz IA, Sertdemir Y. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:704-711.
21. Avila G, Neiva R, Misch CE, et al. Clinical and histologic outcomes after the use of a novel allograft for maxillary sinus augmentation: a case series. Implant Dent 2010;19:330-341.
22. Simunek A, Kopecka D, Somanathan RV, Pilathadka S, Brazda T. Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23:935-942.
23. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:117-124.
24. Hammerle CH, Olah AJ, Schmid J, et al. The biological effect of natural bone mineral on bone formation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:198-207.
25. Peetz M. Characterization of xenogenic bone material. In: Boyne PJ, Evensen L, eds. Osseous Reconstruction of the Maxilla and the Mandible: Surgical Techniques Using Titanium Mesh and Bone Mineral. Carol Stream, Ill: Quintessence; 1997;87-100.
26. Breitbart AS, Staffenberg DA, Thorne CH, et al. Tricalcium phosphate and osteogenin: a bioactive onlay bone graft substitute. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:699-708.
27. Buser D, Hoffmann B, Bernard JP, Lussi A, Mettler D, Schenk RK. Evaluation of filling materials in membrane protected bone defects: a comparative histomorphometric study in the mandible of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:137-150.
28. Ohsawa K, Neo M, Matsuoka H, et al. The expression of bone matrix protein mRNAs around beta-TCP particles implanted into bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:460-466.
29. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11:318-326.
30. Develioglu H, Unver S, Kartal U. The bone-healing effect of a xenograft in a rat calvarial defect model. Dent Mater J. 2009;28: 396-400.
31. Mayfield LJ, Skoglund A, Hising P, Lang NP, Attström R. Evaluation following functional loading of titanium fixtures placed in ridges augmented by deproteinized bone mineral: a human case study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:508-514.
32. Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:193-199.
33. Artzi Z, Givol N, Rohrer MD, Nemcovsky CE, Prasad HS, Tal H. Qualitative and quantitative expression of bovine bone mineral in experimental bone defects. Part 2: morphometric analysis. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1159-1160.
34. Schlegel AK, Donath K. Bio-Oss: a resorbable bone substitute? J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1998;8:201-209.
35. Aybar B, Bilir A, Akcakaya H, Ceyhan T. Effects of tricalcium phosphate bone graft materials on primary cultures of osteoblast cells in vitro. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:119-125.
36. Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Givol N, et al. Biomaterial resorption rate and healing site morphology of inorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate in the canine: a 24-month longitudinal histologic study and morphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:357-368.
37. Yamada S, Heymann D, Bouler JM, Daculsi G. Osteoclastic resorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different hydroxyapatite/ beta-tricalcium phosphate ratios. Biomaterials. 1997;18: 1037-1041.
38. Wiltfang J, Merten HA, Schlegel KA, et al. Degradation characteristics of alpha and beta tricalciumphosphate (TCP) in minipigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63:115-121.
39. Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Impl Res.2010;21:961-970.
40. Athanasiou VT, Papachristou DJ, Panagopoulos A, Saridis A, Scopa CD, Megas P. Histological comparison of autograft, allograft- DBM, xenograft, and synthetic grafts in a trabecular bone defect: an experimental study in rabbits. Med Sci Monit. 2010;16:BR24-31.
41. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:835-840.
42. Hammerle CHF, Chiantella GC, Karring T, Lang NP. The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998; 9:151-162.
43. Storgard-Jensen S, Aaboe M, Pinholt ES, Hjørting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11: 55-66.