A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 147, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 803-807

  Gurgel, Richard K ^a   Jackler, Robert K ^a   Dobie, Robert A ^b,c   Popelka, Gerald R ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Audiogram; Hearing Loss; Hearing Outcome; Hearing Results; Meta Analysis; Reporting Standard; Review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; WORD RECOGNITION; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84872009313     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599812458401     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Jackler RK. Comparability in reporting outcomes: A scientific imperative. Am J Otol. 1996;17:811-812.
2. Monsell E, Balkany T, Gates G, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:179-180.
3. Monsell E, Balkany T, Gates G, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:186-187.
4. Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113:181-185.
5. Gurgel RK, Popelka GR, Oghalai JS, Blevins NH, Chang KW, Jackler RK. Is it valid to calculate the 3-kilohertz threshold by averaging 2 and 4 kilohertz? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(1):102-104.
6. Goldenberg RA, Berliner KI. Reporting operative hearing results: Does choice of outcome measure make a difference? Am J Otol. 1995;16:128-135.
7. Berliner KI, Doyle KJ, Goldenberg RA. Reporting operative hearing results in stapes surgery: Does choice of outcome measure make a difference? Am J Otol. 1996;17:521-528.
8. Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol. 2008;13:193-205.
9. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, et al. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear. 2012;33(1):112-117.
10. Hearing standards scattergram formation. https://www.editorial manager.com/otohns/accounts/Scattergram-tool-Final.xlsm
11. Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1988;97: 55-66.
12. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93:146-147.
13. Guide for the evaluation of hearing handicap. JAMA. 1979; 241:2055-2059.
14. Dobie RA. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: A validation study. Ear Hear. 2011;32:732-740.