Sorting through the many total-energy-cycle pathways possible with early plug-in hybrids

Electric Drive Transportation Association - 23rd Int. Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition 2007, EVS 2007 (Battery, Hybrid, Fuel Cell) Conf. Proc. - Sustainability: The Future of Transportation

Volumn 3, Issue , 2007, Pages 1795-1826

  Gaines, L ^a   Burnham, A ^a   Rousseau, A ^a   Santini, D ^a  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Energy consumption; Li ion battery; Plug in hybrid electric vehicle; Vehicle performance; Zero emissions vehicle (ZEV)

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTANTS; BATTERY PACK; CELLULOSIC BIOMASS; CHARGE DEPLETION; COMBINED CYCLE; CYCLE MODEL; ELECTRIC GENERATION; FINE PARTICULATES; FISCHER-TROPSCH DIESEL; FUEL CELL VEHICLES; FUEL CYCLE; FUEL TYPES; LI-ION BATTERIES; LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES; LNG TANKERS; NATURAL GAS COMBUSTION; PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE; PLUG-IN HYBRIDS; STORAGE CAPABILITY; SULFUR OXIDE; TOTAL ENERGY; ZERO EMISSION;

CARBON MONOXIDE; COAL COMBUSTION; ELECTRIC DRIVES; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ETHANOL; EXHIBITIONS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL CELLS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HYDROGEN; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION; NITROGEN OXIDES; OIL SANDS; SULFUR; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; VEHICLE PERFORMANCE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLES;

EID: 84872006405     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Ng, H.K., J.L. Anderson, and D.J. Santini, Electric and Hybrid Vehicles: a 25-Year Forecast, Automotive Engineering. 104(2):66-70 (February 1996).
2. Singh, M. and D. Santini, Moving towards a user-friendly EV total energy cycle model, presented at TRB Workshop on Air Quality Impacts of Conventional and Alternative Fuel Vehicles, Ann Arbor, MI (Aug 3, 1998).
3. Singh, M.K., Total Energy Cycle Energy Use and Emissions of Electric Vehicles, Transportation Research Record 1664. Paper no. 99-0559, pp. 90-99 (1999).
4. Stodolsky, F., et al., Total Fuel Cycle Impacts of Advanced Vehicles. SAE technical paper 1999-01-0322, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA (1999).
5. Weiss, M.A., et al., On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies, MIT Energy Laboratory Report # MIT EL 00-003, Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., (Oct. 2000).
6. Weiss, M., et al., Comparative Assessment of Fuel Cell Cars, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment Report No. MIT LFEE 2003-001 RP, Cambridge, MA (2003).
7. Heywood, J., Opportunities for Reducing Oil Demand of the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet. Presented at LERDWG Meeting, Washington D.C. (Feb. 8, 2006).
8. General Motors Corp., et al., Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems: North American Analysis - Executive Summary Report. (Available electronically at Argonne National Laboratory's Transportation Technology Research and Development Center web site, www.transportation.anl.gov/. (2001).
9. Brinkman, N., et al., Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions, Available at http://www.transportation.anl.gov/ pdfs/TA/339.pdf (2005).
10. Graham, R., et al., Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options, Final Report, EPRI 1000349, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif. (July 2001).
11. Plotkin, S., et al., Hybrid Vehicle Technology Assessment: Methodology, Analytical Issues, and Interim Results, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD-02-1, Argonne, IL. (Oct. 2001).
12. Vyas, A., H.K. Ng, D.J. Santini, and J.L. Anderson, Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Technology Assessment Based on a Two-Stage Delphi Study, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD-36 (Dec. 1997).
13. Gaines, L. and R. Cuenca, Costs of Lithium Ion Batteries for Vehicles, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD-42. Argonne, IL (May, 1999).
14. Santini, D.J., Two Industry Developments That Justify Optimism About Potential for PHEV Success: (Powertrains and Batteries, Presented at the Electric Drive Transportation Association Conference and Exposition Washington DC. (Nov. 28-30, 2006).
15. Duong, T. Battery Requirements and Solutions for Plug-in Hybrids, Presentation at the Advanced Automotive Battery & Ultracapacitor Conference, Long Beach, CA May 16-18.
16. Balash, P., Alternate pathways to reduced petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, Presented at the USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, Denver CO. (Sept. 20, 2005).
17. Short, W. and P. Denholm. A Preliminary Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on Wind Energy Market, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL/TP-620-39729. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO (April, 2006).
18. Hadley, S.W. Impact of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles on the Electric Grid. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL-TM/2006/554, Oak Ridge, TN (October, 2006).
19. Kintner-Meyer, M., K. Schneider, and R. Pratt. Impacts Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles on Electric Utilities and Regional U.S. Power Grids Part 1: Technical Analysi. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2006).
20. Shelby, M. and S. Mui., Plug-in Hybrids, A Scenario Analysis. Presented at the 86 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (Jan. 22, 2007).
21. Kromer, M. A. and J. B. Heywood, Electric Powertrains: Opportunities and Challenges in the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet, Laboratory for energy and the environment publication No. LFEE 2007-03 RP. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA. (May, 2007)
22. Clement-Nyns, K., K. Van Reusel, and J. Driesen, The Consumption of Electrical Energy of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles in Belgium, EET-2007 European Ele-Drive Conference, Brussels, Belgium (May 30-June 1, 2007).
23. Knipping. E. and M. Duvall, Environmental Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Vol. 2 United States Air Quality Analysis Based on AEO-2006 Assumptions to 2030, Electric Power Research Institute Final Report 1015326, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto CA (June, 2007)
24. Duvall, M. and E. Knipping, Environmental Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles, Vol. 1 Nationwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Electric Power Research Institute Final Report 1015325, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto CA (July, 2007)
25. Vyas, A. et al, Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: How Does One Determine Their Potential for Reducing U.S. Oil Dependence? Electric Vehicle Symposium No. 23, Anaheim, CA (Dec. 2-5, 2007).
26. Burnham, A., M. Wang, and Y. Wu, Development and Applications of GREET 2.7 - The Transportation Vehicle Cycle Model, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL/ESD/06-5. Argonne, IL (Nov. 2006)
27. Howell, D., Electrical Energy Storage. Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Battery Research and Development Activities, Presented at the U.S. Department of Energy PHEV Stakeholder Workshop, Washington DC (June 13, 2007).
28. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Agency, Monthly Energy Review, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC (July, 2007).
29. Argonne National Laboratory, PSAT (Powertrain Systems Analysis Toolkit), http://www.transportation.anl.gov/software/PSAT/ (2007).
30. Birch, S., Safety, style, the diesel hybrid - and the President, Automotive Engineering, SAE International. (July, 2006) pp. 124-125.
31. Freese, C. General Motors' Perspective on Diesel Markets. Diesel Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research Conference, Detroit, MI (Aug. 12-16, 2007).
32. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (EGRID), http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/egrid/index.htm. (2004).
33. Larsen et al., Might Canadian Oil Sands Promote Hydrogen Production for Transportation? Greenhouse Gas Emissions Implications of Oil Sands Recovery and Upgrading. World Resources Review. V. 17 (2). pp. 220-242. (2005).
34. International Energy Agency. Alcohols and alcohol blends as motor fuels. Swedish National Board for Technical Development, Information No. 580-1986. Stockholm. (Oct. 1986).
35. th Congress of the United States. Energy Policy Act of 2005. U.S. Congress, Washington, DC (2005).
36. Yamaguchi, J. Honda builds a better FCX. Automotive Engineering. SAE International. (July, 2007) pp. 54-57.
37. Eberhard, M., Tesla Motors. Presented at the California Air Resources Board ZEV Symposium, Sacramento, CA (Sept. 26, 2006).
38. Brooke, L., Hot off the Grid. Automotive Engineering. April 2007, pp 52-56.
39. Smokers et al. Review and analysis of the reduction potential and costs of technological and other measures to reduce C02-emissions from passenger cars. Final Report. TNO Science and Industry Automotive business unit, Delft, Netherlands (Oct. 31, 2006).
40. Weiss, M., et al., Comparative Assessment of Fuel Cell Cars, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment Report No. MIT LFEE 2003-001 RP, Cambridge, MA. (2003).
41. Heywood, et al., The Performance of Future ICE and Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles and Their Potential Fleet Impact, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Laboratory for Energy and the Environment Report No. MIT LFEE 2003-004 RP (Dec. 2003)
42. Santini, D.J., Broad Overview of Plug-in Hybrids and Analytical Studies, presented at the U.S. Department of Energy Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Discussion Meeting, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. (May 4-5, 2006). http://www.sentech.org/PHEV/Opening-Presentations/Santini- Broad%20Overview%20of%20PHEVs%20and%20Analvtical%20Studies.pdf
43. Andre, M., The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. Science of the Total Environment 334-335 (2004) pp. 73-84.
44. The California Low-Emission Vehicle Regulations for Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium-Duty Vehicles, including all or portions of Sections 1900, 1956.8, 1960.1, 1960.5, 1961, 1961.1, 1962,1962.1,1965,1976,1978, 2062, and 2101, title 13, California Code of Regulations, as of October 11, 2007.
45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicles: Revisions to Improve Calculation of Fuel Economy Estimates, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Report EPA420-D-06-002. Ann Arbor, MI (Jan. 2006).