Diagnosing institutional fit: A formal perspective

Ecology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Cox, Michael ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostics; Formalization; Institutional fit; Social ecological systems

Indexed keywords

LANGUAGE; THEORETICAL STUDY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84871968756     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05173-170454     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243-262.
2. Allemang, D., and J. Hendler. 2008. Semantic web for the working ontologist. Elsevier, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373556-0.00001-0
3. Anderies, J. M., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9(1): 18. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol9/iss1/art18
4. Anderies, J. M., A. A Rodriguez, M. A. Janssen, and O. Cifdaloz. 2007. Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39): 15194-15199. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702655104
5. Berkes, Y. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39):15188-15193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0702098104
6. Brunckhorst, D., P. Coop, and I. Reeve. 2006. 'Eco-civic' optimisation: a nested framework for planning and managing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 265-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.001
7. Carlson, J. M., and J. Doyle. 2002. Complexity and robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 19(99): 2538-2545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012582499
8. Carpenter, S., B. Walker, J. M. Anderies, and N. Abel. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8): 765-781. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
9. Coward, W. 1977. Irrigation management alternatives: themes from indigenous irrigation systems. Agricultural Administration 4(3): 223-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(77) 90006-1
10. Cox, M. 2008. Balancing accuracy and meaning in commonpool resource theory. Ecology and Society 13(2): 44. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art44/
11. Cox, M. 2010. Exploring the dynamics of social-ecological systems: the case of the Taos valley acequias. Dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
12. Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15(4): 38. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/
13. Folke, C., L. Pritchard, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and Society 12(1): 30. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30
14. Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
15. Hanna, S., and M. Munasinghe. 1995. Property rights and the environment: social and ecological issues. Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Hinkel, J. 2008. Transdisciplinary knowledge integration-cases from integrated assessment and vulnerability assessment. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Stockholm Environment Institute.
17. Holling, C. S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1-23.
18. Janssen, M., J. M. Anderies, and E. Ostrom. 2007. Robustness of social-ecological systems to spatial and temporal variability. Society & Natural Resources 20: 307-322. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920601161320
19. Janssen, M. A., Ö. Bodin, J. M. Anderies, T. Elmqvist, H. Ernstson, R. R. J. McAllister, P. Olsson, and P. Ryan. 2006. Toward a network perspective on the resilience of socialecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 15. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art15/
20. Levin, S. A., and J. Lubchencho. 2008. Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 58(1): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/B580107.
21. Niamir-Fuller, M. 1998. The resilience of pastoral herding in Sahelian Africa. Pages 250-284 in F. Berkes and C. Folke, editors. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Olson, D. M., E. Dinerstein, E. D. Wikramanayake, N. D. Burgess, G. V. N. Powell, E. C. Underwood, J. A. D'Amico, I. Itoua, H. E. Strand, J. C. Morrison, C. J. Loucks, T. F. Allnutt, T. H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J. F. Lamoreux, W. W. Wettengel, P. Hedao, and K. R. Kassem. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51(11): 933-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933: TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
23. Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton New Jersey Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
24. Ostrom, E. 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(39): 15181-15187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104
25. Pahl-Wostl, C. 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change 19(3): 354-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
26. Schlager, E. 2007. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. Pages 293-320 in P. A. Sabatier, editor. Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
27. Young, O. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
28. Young, O. 2008. The architecture of global environmental governance: bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics 8(1): 14-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ glep.2008.8.1.14
29. Young, O. 2010. Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change 20(3): 378-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.001
30. Young, O. 2011. Effectiveness of international environmental regimes: existing knowledge, cutting-edge themes, and research strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(50:378-385. [online] URL: http://www.pnas. org/content/early/2011/11/30/1111690108.abstract. http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111690108