Dealer: Application-aware request splitting for interactive cloud applications

CoNEXT 2012 - Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 157-168

  Hajjat, Mohammad ^a   Shankaranarayanan, P N ^a   Maltz, David ^b   Rao, Sanjay ^a   Sripanidkulchai, Kunwadee ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT   (United States)

^c NECTEC Thailand ^*  (Thailand)

Author keywords

Cloud computing; Geo distribution; Interactive multi tier applications; Performance variability; Request redirection; Service level agreement (SLA)

Indexed keywords

GEO-DISTRIBUTION; MULTI-TIER APPLICATIONS; PERFORMANCE VARIABILITY; REQUEST REDIRECTION; SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS;

CLOUD COMPUTING;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 84871959092     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2413176.2413195     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Amazon cloud outage. http://aws.amazon.com/message/2329B7/.
2. Amazon EC2 pricing. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/.
3. Apache, Project Stonehenge. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ StonehengeProposal.
4. Architecting for the Cloud: Best Practices. http://jineshvaria.s3. amazonaws.com/public/cloudbestpractices-jvaria.pdf.
5. Aspect Oriented Programming. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ aa288717%28v=vs.71%29.aspx.
6. Coding in the Cloud. Use a stateless design whenever possible. http://www.rackspace.com/blog/coding-in-the-cloud-rule-3-use-a-stateless-design- whenever-possible/.
7. Event Tracing for Windows (ETW). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ aa363668.aspx.
8. Grinder Load Testing Framework. http://grinder.sourceforge.net/index. html.
9. Latency - it costs you. http://highscalability.com/latency-everywhere- and-it-costs-you-sales-how-crush-it.
10. Microsoft Live outage due to DNS corruption. http://windowsteamblog.com/ windows-live/b/windowslive/archive/2011/09/20/follow-up-on-the-sept-8-service- outage.aspx.
11. Microsoft Windows Azure. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/.
12. Response Time Metric for SLAs. http://testnscale.com/blog/performance/ response-time-metric-for-slas.
13. Slow pages lose users. http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/06/bing-and-google- agree-slow-pag.html.
14. SQL Azure Data Sync. http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/ articles/sql-azure-data-sync-overview.aspx.
15. SQL Azure Performance Issue. http://cloudfail.net/513962.
16. Using SOAP Extensions in ASP.NET. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ magazine/cc164007.aspx.
17. Windows Azure SLA. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/sla/.
18. Windows Azure Thumbnails Sample. http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/ windowsazure/Windows-Azure-Thumbnails-c001c8d7.
19. Windows Azure Traffic Manager (WATM). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ gg197529.
20. AHMAD, F., ET AL. Joint optimization of idle and cooling power in data centers while maintaining response time. ASPLOS 2010.
21. ARMBRUST, M., ET AL. Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing. Tech. rep., EECS, University of California, Berkeley, 2009.
22. BARHAM, P., ET AL. Magpie: Online modelling and performance-aware systems. In HOTOS 2003.
23. BARKER, S., AND SHENOY, P. Empirical evaluation of latency-sensitive application performance in the cloud. In MMSys 2010.
24. BLACKBURN, S. M., AND ET AL. The DaCapo benchmarks: Java benchmarking development and analysis. In OOPSLA 2006.
25. CHEN, Y., IYER, S., LIU, X., MILOJICIC, D., AND SAHAI, A. SLA decomposition: Translating service level objectives to system level thresholds. In ICAC'07.
26. DILLEY, J., ET AL. Globally distributed content delivery. Internet Computing, IEEE (2002).
27. FONSECA, R., PORTER, G., KATZ, R., SHENKER, S., AND STOICA, I. X-trace: A pervasive network tracing framework. In NSDI 2007.
28. HAJJAT, M., ET AL. Cloudward bound: Planning for beneficial migration of enterprise applications to the cloud. SIGCOMM 2010.
29. HASTORUN, D., ET AL. Dynamo: amazons highly available key-value store. In In Proc. SOSP (2007).
30. HONG, Y.-J., ET AL. Dynamic server provisioning to minimize cost in an iaas cloud. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2011.
31. KAMRA, A., MISRA, V., AND NAHUM, E. Yaksha: A self-tuning controller for managing the performance of 3-tiered web sites. In IWQOS 2004.
32. LAGAR-CAVILLA, ET AL. SnowFlock: rapid virtual machine cloning for cloud computing. In ACM EuroSys, 2009.
33. LI, A., YANG, X., KANDULA, S., AND ZHANG, M. CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers. In IMC 2010.
34. PANG, J., ET AL. On the responsiveness of DNS-based network control. In IMC 2004.
35. RANJAN, S., KARRER, R., AND KNIGHTLY, E. Wide area redirection of dynamic content by Internet data centers. In INFOCOM 2004.
36. RIGHTSCALE INC. Cloud computing management platform. http://www. rightscale.com.
37. SATOPAA, V., ET AL. Finding a 'Kneedle' in a Haystack: Detecting Knee Points in System Behavior. In SIMPLEX Workshop, 2011.
38. SHIVAM, P., BABU, S., AND CHASE, J. Learning application models for utility resource planning. In ICAC'06.
39. SU, A., ET AL. Drafting behind Akamai. SIGCOMM 2006.
40. SYMANTEC. 2010 State of the Data Center Global Data. http://www.symantec. com/content/en/us/about/media/pdfs/Symantec-DataCenter10-Report-Global.pdf.
41. URGAONKAR, B., AND SHENOY, P. Cataclysm: Handling extreme overloads in internet services. In PODC 2004.
42. URGAONKAR, B., SHENOY, P., CHANDRA, A., AND GOYAL, P. Dynamic provisioning of multi-tier internet applications. In ICAC 2005.
43. VRABLE, M., ET AL. Scalability, fidelity, and containment in the potemkin virtual honeyfarm. In ACM SOSP, 2005.
44. WANG, G., AND NG, T. S. E. The impact of virtualization on network performance of Amazon EC2 data center. In IEEE INFOCOM 2010.
45. WENDELL, P., ET AL. DONAR: decentralized server selection for cloud services. In SIGCOMM 2010.
46. ZHANG, Q., CHERKASOVA, L., AND SMIRNI, E. A regression-based analytic model for dynamic resource provisioning of multi-tier applications. In ICAC'07.