Transforming animals in a cyber-behavioral biometric menagerie with Frog-Boiling attacks

2012 IEEE 5th International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 289-296

  Wang, Zibo ^a   Serwadda, Abdul ^a   Balagani, Kiran S ^b   Phoha, Vir V ^a  

^a LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC SYSTEMS; DATA SETS; EQUAL ERROR RATE; ERROR RATE; UPDATE SCHEMES; VERIFICATION SYSTEMS;

BIOMETRICS;

EID: 84871942674     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BTAS.2012.6374591     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Keystroke dynamics benchmark data set. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~keystroke/. Last accessed in Sept, 2011.
2. Babara and D. P. Mikkelson. Snopes. http://www.snopes.com/critters/wild/ frogboil.asp. Last accessed in Mar, 2012.
3. F. Bergadano, D. Gunetti, and C. Picardi. User authentication through keystroke dynamics. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., 5:367-397, November 2002.
4. E. Chan-Tin, V. Heorhiadi, N. Hopper, and Y. Kim. The frogboiling attack: Limitations of secure network coordinate systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., 14(3):27:1-27:23, nov 2011.
5. G. Doddington, W. Liggett, A. Martin, M. Przybocki, and D. Reynolds. Sheep, goats, lambs and wolves a statistical analysis of speaker performance in the nist 1998 speaker recognition evaluation. In International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1998.
6. D. Gunetti and C. Picardi. Keystroke analysis of free text. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., 8(3):312-347, 2005.
7. P. Kang, S. Hwang, and S. Cho. Continual retraining of keystroke dynamics based authenticator. In ICB, pages 1203-1211, 2007.
8. R. Khandaker, K. Balagani, and V. Phoha. Making impostor pass rates meaningless: A case of snoop-forge-replay attack on continuous cyber-behavioural verification with keystrokes. In IEEE Computer Society and IEEE Biometrics Council Workshop on Biometrics, 2011.
9. K. Killourhy and R. Maxion. Why did my detector do that?!: predicting keystroke-dynamics error rates. In RAID, pages 256-276, 2010.
10. K. S. Killourhy and R. A. Maxion. Comparing anomaly-detection algorithms for keystroke dynamics. In DSN, pages 125-134, 2009.
11. A. Ross and A. Jain. Information fusion in biometrics. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24:2115-2125, 2003.
12. A. Ross, A. Rattani, and M. Tistarelli. Exploiting the doddington zoo effect in biometric fusion. In BTAS '09., pages 1-7, sept. 2009.
13. A. Serwadda, V. V. Phoha, and A. Kiremire. Using global knowledge of users' typing traits to attack keystroke biometrics templates. In MMSec'11, pages 51-60, 2011.
14. D. Stefan, X. Shu, and D. D. Yao. Robustness of Keystroke- Dynamics based biometrics against synthetic forgeries. Computers & Security, Oct. 2011.
15. N. Yager and T. Dunstone. The biometric menagerie. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(2):220-30, 2010.
16. Y. Zhao, Y. Xie, F. Yu, Q. Ke, Y. Yu, Y. Chen, and E. Gillum. Botgraph: Large scale spamming botnet detection. In NSDI, pages 321-334, 2009.