메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 736-743

Application of the Benefit-Risk Action Team (BRAT) Framework in Pharmaceutical R&D: Results From a Pilot Program

Author keywords

benefit risk; drug development; outcome assessment; pharmacovigilence; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENEFIT RISK ACTION TEAM; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; DRUG MANUFACTURE; HUMAN; PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER; PILOT STUDY; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871937059     PISSN: 00928615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0092861512458908     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (22)

References (15)
  • 2
    • 77954882236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment
    • Breckenridge A.Regulatory challenges, reimbursement, and risk-benefit assessment.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88 (2): 153-154.
    • (2010) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.88 , Issue.2 , pp. 153-154
    • Breckenridge, A.1
  • 3
    • 78951480208 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines
    • Coplan PM,Noel RA,Levitan BS,Ferguson J,Mussen F.Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89 (2): 312-315.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , Issue.2 , pp. 312-315
    • Coplan, P.M.1    Noel, R.A.2    Levitan, B.S.3    Ferguson, J.4    Mussen, F.5
  • 4
    • 78951477988 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights
    • Levitan BS,Andrews EB,Gilsenan A, et al.Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89 (2): 217-224.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.89 , Issue.2 , pp. 217-224
    • Levitan, B.S.1    Andrews, E.B.2    Gilsenan, A.3
  • 5
    • 60349128681 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Measuring benefit and balancing risk: strategies for the benefit-risk assessment of new medicines in a risk-averse environment
    • Walker S,McAuslane N,Liberti L,Salek S.Measuring benefit and balancing risk: strategies for the benefit-risk assessment of new medicines in a risk-averse environment.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85 (3): 241-246.
    • (2009) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.85 , Issue.3 , pp. 241-246
    • Walker, S.1    McAuslane, N.2    Liberti, L.3    Salek, S.4
  • 6
    • 81355139593 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the decision-making process for nonprescription drugs: a framework for benefit-risk assessment
    • Brass EP,Lofstedt R,Renn O.Improving the decision-making process for nonprescription drugs: a framework for benefit-risk assessment.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90 (6): 791-803.
    • (2011) Clin Pharmacol Ther , vol.90 , Issue.6 , pp. 791-803
    • Brass, E.P.1    Lofstedt, R.2    Renn, O.3
  • 7
    • 84873815945 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The European Medicines Agency. Benefit-Risk Methodology Project, Published March 2009. Accessed March 12, 2012
    • The European Medicines Agency. Benefit-Risk Methodology Project. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Report/2011/07/WC500109477.pdf. Published March 2009. Accessed March 12, 2012.
  • 8
    • 84873881862 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CIRS, Accessed April 1, 2012
    • CIRS. Benefit-risk assessment. http://cirsci.org/benefit-risk. Accessed April 1, 2012.
    • Benefit-risk assessment
  • 9
    • 84873875977 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Innovative Medicines Initiative, Published 2010. Accessed May 27, 2012
    • Innovative Medicines Initiative. Protect. http://www.imi.europa.eu/content/protect. Published 2010. Accessed May 27, 2012.
    • Protect
  • 10
    • 84873872607 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PDUFA reauthorization performance goals and procedures fiscal years 2013 through 2017, Published 2012. Accessed August 16, 2012
    • PDUFA reauthorization performance goals and procedures fiscal years 2013 through 2017. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm270412.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed August 16, 2012.
  • 12
    • 84873838904 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FDA working with patients to explore benefit/risk: opportunities and challenges. Meeting notice, Accessed April 16, 2012
    • FDA working with patients to explore benefit/risk: opportunities and challenges. Meeting notice. http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ByAudience/ForPatientAdvocates/ucm298136.htm. Accessed April 16, 2012.
  • 13
    • 84873858360 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee for rivaroxaban, Published September 2011. Accessed April 1, 2012
    • Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee for rivaroxaban. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/CardiovascularandRenalDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM272005.pdf. Published September 2011. Accessed April 1, 2012.
  • 15
    • 0141505916 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Benefit-risk analysis: a proposal using quantitative methods
    • Holden WL,Juhaeri J,Dai W.Benefit-risk analysis: a proposal using quantitative methods.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003;12 (7): 611-616.
    • (2003) Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf , vol.12 , Issue.7 , pp. 611-616
    • Holden, W.L.1    Juhaeri, J.2    Dai, W.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.