Continuous glucose monitoring: Quality of hypoglycaemia detection

Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 130-135

  Zijlstra, E ^a   Heise, T ^a   Nosek, L ^a   Heinemann, L ^a   Heckermann, S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Glycaemic control; Type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING SENSOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE SENSOR; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84871933398     PISSN: 14628902     EISSN: 14631326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bode B, Gross K, Rikalo N et al. Alarms based on real-time sensor glucose values alert patients to hypo- and hyperglycemia: the guardian continuous monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004; 6: 105-113.
2. Garg S, Zisser H, Schwartz S et al. Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 44-50.
3. Weinstein RL, Schwartz SL, Brazg RL, Bugler JR, Peyser TA, McGarraugh GV. Accuracy of the 5-day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1125-1130.
4. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. The accuracy of the Guardian RT continuous glucose monitor in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 266-272.
5. Kovatchev B, Anderson S, Heinemann L, Clarke W. Comparison of the numerical and clinical accuracy of four continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1160-1164.
6. Mastrototaro J, Shin J, Marcus A, Sulur G. The accuracy and efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring sensor in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 385-390.
7. Garg SK, Smith J, Beatson C, Lopez-Baca B, Voelmle M, Gottlieb PA. Comparison of Accuracy and Safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 65-72.
8. Wentholt IM, Hart AA, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors? Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 57-68.
9. Wentholt IM, Vollebregt MA, Hart AA, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. Comparison of a needle-type and a microdialysis continuous glucose monitor in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2871-2876.
10. American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Defining and reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1245-1249.
11. DIN EN ISO 15197 In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (ISO15197:2003). Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization, 2003.
12. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987; 10: 622-628.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
14. Keenan DB, Cartaya R, Mastrototaro JJ. Accuracy of a new real-time continuous glucose monitoring algorithm. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010; 4: 111-118.
15. Wei C, Lunn DJ, Acerini CL et al. Measurement delay associated with the Guardian RT continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabet Med 2010; 27: 117-122.
16. Zueger T, Krull I, Mougiakakou S, Diem P, Stettler C. Influence of time-point of calibration on accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetologia 2011; 54(Suppl. 1): 971.
17. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 17-22.
18. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1947-1953.
19. Heise T, Koschinsky T, Heinemann L, Lodwig V. Hypoglycemia warning signal and glucose sensors: requirements and concepts. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003; 5: 563-571.
20. Buckingham B, Block J, Burdick J et al. Response to nocturnal alarms using a real-time glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005; 7: 440-447.
21. Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2007; 151 388-93, 393.
22. Mastrototaro J, Welsh JB, Lee S. Practical considerations in the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring alerts. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010; 4: 733-739.
23. Palerm CC, Willis JP, Desemone J, Bequette BW. Hypoglycemia prediction and detection using optimal estimation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2005; 7: 3-14.
24. Peoples T, Bailey T, Brazg R et al. Accuracy of the Medtronic NexSensor for 6 Days in an Inpatient Setting Using Abdomen and Buttock Insertion Sites. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2010. Bethesda (MA). Abstract.