Use of kernel density estimation and maximum curvature to set Marine Protected Area boundaries: Identifying a Special Protection Area for wintering red-throated divers in the UK

Biological Conservation

Volumn 156, Issue , 2012, Pages 15-21

  O'Brien, Susan H ^a   Webb, Andrew ^a,c   Brewer, Mark J ^b   Reid, James B ^a  

^a JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE   (United Kingdom)

^b SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c HiDef Aerial Surveying Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aerial survey; Distance sampling; Gavia stellata; Natura 2000; Outer Thames Estuary; Seabird

Indexed keywords

BIRD; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PROTECTED AREA; STAKEHOLDER;

ENGLAND; THAMES ESTUARY; UNITED KINGDOM;

AVES; GAVIA STELLATA;

EID: 84871925825     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.033     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amorim P., Figueiredo M., Machete M., Morato T., Martins A., Serrão Santos R. Spatial variability of seabird distribution associated with environmental factors: a case study of marine Important Bird Areas in the Azores. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2009, 66:29-40.
2. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27:93-115.
3. Arcos, J.M., Bécares, J., Rodríguez, B., Ruiz, A., 2009. áreas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves marinas en España. LIFE04NAT/ES/000049-SEO/BirdLife. Madrid.
4. Arcos, J.M., Bécares, J., Villero, D., Brotons, L., Rodrígues, B., Ruiz, A., this issue. Assessing the location and stability of hotspots for pelagic seabirds: an approach to identify marine Important Bird Areas (IBAs) in Spain. Biological Conservation.
5. BirdLife International Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12 2004, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
6. BirdLife International Marine Important Bird Areas Toolkit: Standardised Techniques for Identifying Priority Sites for the Conservation of Seabirds at Sea 2010, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
7. Buckland S.T., Anderson R.R., Burnham K.P., Laake J.L., Borchers D.L., Thomas L. Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance in biological populations 2001, T.J. International Ltd., Padstow, Cornwall.
8. Calbrade, N.A., Holt, C.A., Austin, G.E., Mellan, H.J., Hearn, R.D., Stroud, D.A., Wotton, S.R., Musgrove, A.J., 2010. Waterbirds in the UK 2008/09: The Wetland Bird Survey. BTO/RSPB/JNCC in Association with WWT, Thetford.
9. Camphuysen, C.J., Fox, A.D., Leopold, M.F., Petersen, I.K., 2004. Towards Standardised Seabird at Sea Census Techniques in Connection with Environmental Impact Assessments for Offshore Wind Farms in the UK: A Comparison of Ship and Aerial Sampling Methods for Marine Birds, and their Applicability to Offshore Wind Farm Assessments. NIOZ Report to COWRIE, NIOZ, Texel.
10. Cannone N. Minimum area assessment and different sampling approaches for the study of vegetation communities in Antarctica. Antarctic Science 2004, 16:157-164.
11. Cressie N.A.C. Statistics for Spatial Data 1993, Wiley, New York.
12. Donald P.F., Sanderson F.J., Burfield I.J., Bierman S.M., Gregory R.D., Waliczky Z. International conservation policy delivers benefits for birds in Europe. Science 2007, 317:810-813.
13. EU, 1992. Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union L 2067 (22.07.1992).
14. EU, 2009. Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (codified version). Official Journal of the European Union L 20/7 (26.1.2010).
15. European Commission, 2007. Guidelines for the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment. Application of the Habitats and Birds Directives, European Commission, Brussels.
16. Fieberg J. Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology 2007, 88:1059-1066.
17. Garthe, S., Markones, N., Mendel, B., Sonntag, N., Krause, J.C., this issue. Protected areas for seabirds in German offshore waters: designation, retrospective consideration and current perspectives. Biological Conservation.
18. Gavrilo, M., 2008. Divers in the Russian Arctic: current state of knowledge on distribution, migration, population status. In: Håland, A. (Ed.), The Loon & Diver Workshop 2007, Ornithology Studies, vol. 1. Vardø, Norway, pp. 13-16.
19. Gitzen R.A., Millspaugh J.J., Kernohan B.J. Bandwidth selection for fixed-kernel analysis of animal utilization distributions. Journal of Wildlife Management 2006, 70:1334-1344.
20. Grecian, W.J., Witt, M.J., Attrill, M.J., Bearhop, S., Godley, B.J., Grémillet, D., Hamer, K.C., Votier, S.C., this issue. A novel projection technique to identify important at-sea areas for seabird conservation: an example using Northern gannets breeding in the North East Atlantic. Biological Conservation.
21. Guisan A., Zimmerman N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 2000, 135:147-186.
22. Guse N., Garthe S., Schirmeister B. Diet of red-throated divers Gavia stellata reflects the seasonal availability of Atlantic herring Clupea harengus in the southwestern Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research 2009, 62:268-275.
23. Halpern B.S. The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter?. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:117-137.
24. Holt C.A., Mantua N. Defining spring transition: regional indices for the California Current System. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2009, 393:285-299.
25. Kahlert, J., Desholm, M., Clausager, I., Petersen, I.K., 2000. Environmental Impact Assessment of an Offshore Wind Park at Rødsand. Technical Report on Birds. NERI, Rønde.
26. Kober, K., Webb, A., Win, I., Lewis, M., O'Brien, S., Wilson, L.J., Reid, J.B., 2010. An analysis of the numbers and distribution of seabirds within the British Fishery Limit aimed at identifying areas that qualify as possible marine SPAs. JNCC Report, No. 431, Peterborough, UK.
27. Lascelles, B.G., Langham, G.M., Ronconi, R.A., Reid, J.B., this issue. From hotspots to site protection: identifying Marine Protected Areas for seabirds around the globe. Biological Conservation.
28. Louzao M., Hyrenbach K.D., Arcos J.M., Abelló P., Gil de Sola L., Oro D. Oceanographic habitat of a critically endangered mediterranean procellariiform: implications for the design of marine protected areas. Ecological Applications 2006, 16:1683-1695.
29. Maclean I.M.D., Skov H., Rehfisch M.M., Piper W. Use of aerial surveys to detect bird displacement by offshore windfarms. BTO Research Report No. 446 to COWRIE 2006, BTO, Thetford.
30. McLeod D.R.A., Whitfield D.P., Fielding A.H., Haworth P.F., McGrady M.J. Predicting home range use by golden eagles Aquila chrysaetos in western Scotland. Avian Science 2002, 2:183-198.
31. McSorley, C.A., Webb, A., Dean, B.J., Reid, J.B., 2004. UK inshore Special Protection Areas: a methodological evaluation of site selection and definition of the extent of the interest feature using line transect data. JNCC Report No. 344. JNCC, Peterborough.
32. Mel'nikov M.S. Analytic capacity: a discrete approach and the curvature of measure. Sbornik: Mathematics 1995, 186:57-76.
33. O'Brien S.H., Wilson L.J., Webb A., Cranswick P.A. Revised estimate of numbers of wintering red-throated divers Gavia stellata in Great Britain. Bird Study 2008, 55:152-160.
34. Oppel, S., Meirinho, A., Ramírez, I., Gardner, B., O'Connell, A., Miller, P.I., Louzao, M., this issue. Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds. Biological Conservation.
35. Pauly D., Christensen V., Guenette S., Pitcher T.R., Sumaila U.R., Walters C.J., Watson R., Zeller D. Toward sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 2002, 418:689-695.
36. Petersen, I.K., Christensen, T.K., Kahlert, J., Desholm, M., Fox, A.D., 2006a. Final results of bird studies at the offshore wind farms at Nysted and Horns Rev, Denmark. Report Commissioned by DONG Energy and Vattenfall A/S. NERI, Denmark.
37. Petersen, I.K., Pihl, S., Hounisen, J.P., Holm, T.E., Clausen, P., Therkildsen, O., Christensen, T.K., 2006b. Landsdækkende optællinger af vandfugle, januar og februar 2004. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser. Faglig rapport fra DMU nr. 606. <>. http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR606.pdf.
38. Pichegru L., Gremillet D., Crawford R.J.M., Ryan P.G. Marine no-take zone rapidly benefits endangered penguin. Biology Letters 2010, 6:498-501.
39. Ramírez, I., Geraldes, P., Meirinho, A., Amorim, P., Paiva, V., 2008. áreas Marinhas Importantes para as Aves em Portugal. Projecto LIFE04 NAT/PT/000213 - Sociedade Portuguesa Para o Estudo das Aves. Lisboa) and SEO/BirdLife (Arcos, J.M., Bécares, J., Rodríguez, B., Ruiz, A., 2009. áreas Importantes para la Conservación de las Aves marinas en España. LIFE04NAT/ES/000049-SEO/BirdLife. Madrid). <>. http://www.seo.org/avesmarinas/flash.html#/1/.
40. Ripley B.D. Spatial Statistics 2004, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
41. Schwemmer P., Mendel B., Sonntag N., Dierschke V., Garthe S. Effects of ship traffic on seabirds in offshore waters: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning. Ecological Applications 2011, 21:1851-1860.
42. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis 1986, CRC Press, Abingdon.
43. Skov H., Prins E. Impact of estuarine fronts on the dispersal of piscivorous birds in the German Bight. Marine Ecology Progress Series 2001, 214:279-287.
44. Stirling J.R., Zakynthinaki M. The point of maximum curvature as a marker for physiological time series. Journal of Non-linear Mathematical Physics 2008, 15:396-406.
45. Stone, C.J., Webb, A., Barton, C., Ratcliffe, N., Reed, T.C., Tasker, M.L., Camphuysen, C.J., Pienkowski, M.W., 1995. An Atlas of Seabird Distribution in North-west European Waters. JNCC, Peterborough.
46. Stroud, D.A., Chambers, D., Cook, S., Buxton, N., Fraser, B., Clement, P., Lewis, I., McLean, I., Baker, H., Whitehead, S., 2001. The UK SPA Network: its Scope and Content, vols. 1-3. JNCC, Peterborough, UK.
47. Thomas L., Buckland S.T., Rexstad E.A., Laake J.L., Strindberg S., Hedley S.L., Bishop J.R.B., Marques T.A., Burnham K.P. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology 2010, 47:5-14.
48. Wauters L.A., Preatoni D.G., Molinari A., Tosi G. Radio-tracking squirrels: performance of home range density and linkage. Ecological Modelling 2007, 202:333-344.
49. Webb, A., 2009. Defining draft SPA boundaries for common scoter and red-throated divers using optimum density thresholds. JNCC Paper to Chief Scientists Group, February, 2009.
50. Webb, A., McSorley, C.A., Dean, B.J., Reid, J.B., 2004. Modelling the distribution and abundance of black scoter Melanitta nigra in Carmarthen Bay in winter 2001/02: a method for identifying potential boundaries for a marine Special Protection Area. JNCC Report No. 330. JNCC, Peterborough.
51. Webb, A., Dean, B.J., O'Brien, S.H., Söhle, I., McSorley, C., Reid, J.B., Cranswick, P.A., Smith, L.E., Hall, C., 2009. The numbers of inshore waterbirds using the Greater Thames during the non-breeding season; an assessment of the area's potential for qualification as a marine SPA. JNCC Report No. 374. JNCC, Peterborough.
52. Whitehead S., Johnstone I., Wilson J. Choughs Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax breeding in Wales select foraging habitat at different spatial scales. Bird Study 2005, 52:193-203.
53. Whitfield D.P. Status of breeding Dotterel Charadrius morinellus in Britain in 1999. Bird Study 2002, 49:237-249.
54. Wilson L.J., McSorley C.A., Gray C.M., Dean B.J., Dunn T.E., Webb A., Reid J.B. Radio-telemetry as a tool to define protected areas for seabirds in the marine environment. Biological Conservation 2009, 142:1808-1817.
55. Worton B.J. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 1989, 70:164-168.