Analysis of the effects of intra-urban spatial structures on carbon footprint of residents in Seoul, Korea

Habitat International

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 192-198

  Kim, Taehyun ^a   Kim, Hongkyu ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Carbon footprint; Gross density; Net density; Path analysis; Seoul

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ENERGY USE; HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; URBAN POPULATION;

SEOUL [SOUTH KOREA]; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84871920488     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arbuckle J. AMOS 7.0 user guide 2006, SPSS, Chicago.
2. Chen H., Jia B., Lau S. Sustainable urban form for Chinese compact cities: challenges of a rapid urbanized economy. Habitat International 2008, 32(1):28-40.
3. Clarke P. Urban planning and design. Sustainable urban design: An environmental approach 2003, 14-24. Spon Press, London. R. Thomas (Ed.).
4. Cone J.D., Foster S.L. Dissertations and theses from start to finish: Psychology and related fields 2006, American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
5. Duvarci Y., Kutluca A.K. Appraisal of energy efficiency of urban development plans: The fidelity concept on Izmir-Balcova Case 2008, Paper presented at the Proceedings of World Academy of Science: Engineering & Technology.
6. Ewing B., Reed A., Rizk S.M., Galli A., Wackernagel M., Kitzes J. Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts, 2008 edition 2008, Global Footprint Network, Oakland.
7. Ewing R., Rong F. The impact of urban form on US residential energy use. Housing Policy Debate 2008, 19(1):1-30.
8. Ewing R., Schmid T., Killingsworth R., Zlot A., Raudenbush S. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. American Journal of Health Promotion 2003, 18(1):47-57.
9. Frenkel A., Ashkenazi M. The integrated sprawl index: measuring the urban landscape in Israel. Annals of Regional Science 2008, 42:99-121.
10. Global Footprint Network (GFN) Ecological footprint standards 2009 2009, Global Footprint Network, Oakland.
11. Göçmen Z.A. Relationships between residential development and the environment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2009, 29(1):54-66.
12. Headicar P. The exploding city region: should it, can it, be reversed?. Achieving sustainable urban form 2000, 160-173. E & FN Spon, London. K. Williams, E. Burton, M. Jenks (Eds.).
13. Holden E. Ecological footprints and sustainable urban form. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2004, 19:91-109.
14. Holden E., Norland I. Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater Oslo Region. Urban Studies 2005, 42:2145-2166.
15. Ichinose T., Shimodozono K., Hanaki K. Impact of anthropogenic heat on urban climate in Tokyo. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33:3897-3909.
16. Jabareen Y.R. Sustainable urban forms: their typologies, models, and concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2006, 26(1):38-52.
17. Jo J., Golden J., Shin S. Incorporating built environment factors into climate change mitigation strategies for Seoul, South Korea: a sustainable urban systems framework. Habitat International 2009, 33(3):267-275.
18. Kim K.-G. Design for energy-conserving cities: a new town example (Korea). Nature & Resources 1986, 22(3):20-27.
19. Kim D.U. Amos A to Z 2008, Hakhyunsa.
20. Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2004, Guilford Press, New York.
21. Korea Energy Management Corporation (KEMCO) Yearbook of energy statistics 2008.
22. Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) Internet statistics by province 2008, Accessed 06.11.09. http://isis.nida.or.kr/eng/index.jsp.
23. Lee H.S., Lim J.H. Structural equation modeling with AMOS 16.0 2009, Bobmunsa.
24. Masnavi M. The new millennium and the new urban paradigm: the compact city in practice. Achieving sustainable urban form 2000, 64-73. E&FN Spon, London. K. Williams, E. Burton, M. Jenks (Eds.).
25. Newman P. The environmental impact of cities. Environment and Urbanization 2006, 18(2):275-295.
26. Norman J., MacLean H.L., Kennedy C.A. Comparing high and low residential density: life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2006, 132:10-21.
27. Owens S.E. Energy, planning and urban form 1986, Pion.
28. Owens S.E. Land use planning for energy efficiency. Energy, land & public policy - Energy & environmental policy 1990, 53-87. Transaction Publishers. J.B. Cullingworth (Ed.).
29. Owens S.E. Energy, environmental sustainability and land-use planning. Sustainable development and urban form 1992, 79-105. Pion. M.J. Breheny (Ed.).
30. Qin B., Han S.S. Planning parameters and household carbon emission: evidence from high-and low-carbon neighborhoods in Beijing. Habitat International 2012.
31. Rees W., Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 1996, 16:223-248.
32. Rodrigue J., Comtois C., Slack B. The geography of transport systems 2006, Routledge.
33. Schumacker R., Lomax R. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) 2009 Seoul statistical yearbook 2009.
35. Simmonds D., Coombe D. The transport implications of alternative urban forms. Achieving sustainable urban form 2000, 121-130. E & FN Spon, New York. K. Williams, E. Burton, M. Jenks (Eds.).
36. Vegara J. Footprint computation: Three common errors 2000, Institut dEstudis Metropolitns de Barcelona, Barcelona.
37. Williams K., Burton E., Jenks M. Achieving sustainable urban form 2000, E & FN Spon, London.
38. Wright K.B. Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005, 10(3). 00-00.