Evaluation of a predevelopment service delivery intervention: An application to improve clinical handovers

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Yao, Guiqing Lily ^a   Novielli, Nicola ^a   Manaseki Holland, Semira ^a   Chen, Yen Fu ^a   Van Der Klink, Marcel ^b   Barach, Paul ^c,d,e   Chilton, Peter J ^a   Lilford, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^c Utrecht Medical Center   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WARFARIN;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL HANDOVER; COMMUNITY CARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEMIPLEGIA; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; BAYES THEOREM; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ERROR; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; RISK MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BAYES THEOREM; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MEDICAL ERRORS; MODELS, ECONOMIC; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT HANDOFF; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871900940     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001210     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 1. Conceptualising and developing interventions. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:158-62.
2. Medical Research Council (MRC). Developing and evaluating complex intervention: new guidance. London, UK: MRC, 2008.
3. Vallejo-Torres L, Steuten LM, Buxton MJ, et al. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: a Bayesian approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008;24:459-64.
4. Lilford RJ, Chilton PJ, Hemming K, et al. Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points. BMJ 2010;341:c4413.
5. Mason J, Freemantle N, Nazareth I, et al. When is it cost-effective to change the behavior of health professionals? JAMA 2001;286:2988-92. (Pubitemid 33140363)
6. Ovretveit J. Does improving quality save money? - Health Foundation. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/does-improving-quality-save-money/ (accessed 10 Jul 2012).
7. Mohr J, Batalden P, Barach P. Integrating patient safety into the clinical microsystem. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:34-8.
8. Philibert I. Use of strategies from high-reliability organisations to the patient hand-off by resident physicians: practical implications. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:261-6.
9. Apostolakis G, Barach P. Lessons learned from nuclear power. In: Hatlie M, Tavill K, eds. Patient safety: international textbook. Faithersburg, MD: Aspen Publications, 2003:205-25.
10. van der Klink M, Kicken W, Drachsler H, et al. Deliverable 9 - Evaluation report regarding training and use of tools. 2011.
11. Brown C, Lilford R. Evaluating service delivery interventions to enhance patient safety. BMJ 2008;337:a2764.
12. Australian Council for Safety and Quality in Health Care. Clinical Handover and Patient Safety - Literature review report. 2005. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/ AA1369AD4AC5FC2ACA2571BF0081CD95/$File/clinhovrlitrev.pdf (accessed 21 May 2012).
13. Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, et al. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:161-7. (Pubitemid 36231621)
14. Mistiaen P, Francke AL, Poot E. Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:47.
15. Shepperd S, McClaran J, Phillips CO, et al. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1). Art. No.: CD00313.
16. Kirkwood BR, Sterne JA. Essential medical statistics. 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science Ltd, 2003:449-51.
17. Lilford R, Pronovost P. Using hospital mortality rates to judge hospital performance: a bad idea that just won't go away. BMJ 2010;340:c2016.
18. Khalil EL. The Bayesian fallacy: distinguishing internal motivations and religious beliefs from other beliefs. J Econ Behav Organ 2010;75:268-80.
19. O'Hagan A, Buck CE, Daneshkhah A, et al. Uncertain judgements: eliciting experts' probabilities. London, UK: Wiley, 2006.
20. Ashby D, Smith AF. Evidence-based medicine as Bayesian decision-making. Stat Med 2000;19:3291-305.
21. Lilford R, Braunholtz DA. The statistical basis of public policy: a paradigm shift is overdue. BMJ 1996;313:603-60.
22. Spiegelhalter DJ, Freedman LS, Parmar MK. Applying Bayesian ideas in drug development and clinical trials. Stat Med 1993;12:1501-11.
23. Bowater R, Lilford R. Clinical effectiveness in cardiovascular trials in relation to the importance to the patient of the end points measured. J Eval Clin Pract 2011;17:547-53.
24. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. 1991. NEJM 1991;324:370-6.
25. Halfon P, Eggli Y, van Melle G, et al. Measuring potentially avoidable hospital readmissions. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:573-87. (Pubitemid 34621501)
26. Novielli N, Chen Y-F, van der Klink M, et al. Deliverable nr D7 - report quantifying the expected benefits of the planned interventions. 2010. http://www.handover.eu/upload/library/z740hd0knqw1akbauau25.pdf (accessed 19 Apr 2012).
27. Johnson SR, Tomlinson GA, Hawker GA, et al. Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:355-69.
28. Whitehead SJ, Shehzad A. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull 2010;96:5-21.
29. Novielli N, van der Klink M, Manaseki-Holland S, et al. Deliverable nr D11 - report quantifying the resources actually consumed in each country by type of intervention. 2011. http://www.handover.eu/upload/library/ zbsrzp1g4d1f12b9gu7h8.pdf (accessed 19 Apr 2012).
30. Hoonhout LH, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, et al. Direct medical costs of adverse events in Dutch hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:27.
31. Tan SS, Bouwmans CA, Rutten FF, et al. Update of the Dutch manual for costing in economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012;28:152-8.
32. Zegers M, De Bruijne MC, Wagner C. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:297-302.
33. Rodríguez-Monguió R, Otero MJ, Rovira J. Assessing the economic impact of adverse drug effects. Pharmacoeconomics 2003;21:623-50. (Pubitemid 36808215)
34. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:163-9.
35. Girling A, Young T, Brown C, et al. Early-stage valuation of medical devices: the role of developmental uncertainty. Value Health 2010;13:585-91.
36. Girling AJ, Lilford RJ, Young TP. Pricing of medical devices under coverage uncertainty-a modelling approach. Health Econ. Published Online First: 20 October 2011. doi: 10.1002/hec.1807.
37. Coleman JJ, Hemming K, Nightingale PG, et al. Can an electronic prescribing system detect doctors who are more likely to make a serious prescribing error? J R Soc Med 2011;104:208-18.
38. Tufts Medical Center. CEA Registry Website. 2012. https://research.tufts- nemc.org/cear4/Home.aspx (accessed 18 May 2012).
39. Steuten L, Buxton M. Economic evaluation of healthcare safety: which attributes of safety do healthcare professionals consider most important in resource allocation decisions? Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e6.