Mapping and assessing clinical handover training interventions

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 21, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Stoyanov, Slavi ^a   Boshuizen, Henny ^a   Groene, Oliver ^b   Van Der Klink, Marcel ^a   Kicken, Wendy ^a   Drachsler, Hendrik ^a   Barach, Paul ^c,d,e  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^d Utrecht Medical Center   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL HANDOVER; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COORDINATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; STANDARDIZATION; CURRICULUM; DOCUMENTATION; EVALUATION STUDY; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; IN SERVICE TRAINING; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; DOCUMENTATION; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL AUDIT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT HANDOFF; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84871892342     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001169     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cheah LP, Pollard J, Watters DAK. Electronic medical handover: towards safer medical care. Med J Aust 2005;7:369-73.
2. Iedema R, Merrick ET, Kerridge R, et al. Handover-enabling learning in communication for safety (HELiCS): a report on achievements at two hospital sites. Med J Aust 2009;11:133-6.
3. Barach P, Philibert I. The July effect: fertile ground for systems improvement. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:331-2;PMID 21747094.
4. Arora VM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, et al. A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:11-14. (Pubitemid 351265298)
5. Laugaland KA, Aase K, Barach P. Interventions to improve patient safety in transitional care - A review of the evidence. Work 2012;4:2915-24.
6. Johnson J, Barach P. Patient care handovers: what it will take to ensure quality and safety during times of transition. Med J Aust 2009;11:110-12.
7. Shojania KG, Fletcher KE, Sanjay S. Graduate medical education and patient safety: A busy and occasionally hazardous intersection. Ann Intern Med 2006;8:592-8. (Pubitemid 46780938)
8. Milano M, Ullius D. Designing powerful training. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer, 1998.
9. Rothwell WJ, Kazanas HC. Human resource development. A strategic approach. Amherst, MA: HRD Press, 1994.
10. Etienne W. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
11. Phillips JJ. How much is the training worth? Training Dev 1996;4:20-4.
12. Levinson D. Hospital incident reporting system do not capture most patient harm. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General. January 2012. OEI-06-09-00091. http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06- 09-00091.asp (accessed 6 Aug 2012).
13. Concept Systems Global [Computer Software]. Ithaca, NY: Concept Systems, Inc, 2011.
14. Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 1989;12:1-16.
15. Kane M, Trochim W. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2007.
16. Stoyanov S, Hoogveld B, Kirschner PA. Mapping major changes to education and training in 2025. JRC Technical Note European Communities Institute for Prospective Technological Studies 2010: JRC59079:2-52.
17. Eden C, Ackermann F. Making strategy. The journey of strategic management. London, UK: Sage Publications, 2002.
18. Concept System Core [Computer Software]. Ithaca, NY: Concept Systems, Inc, 2011.
19. Bartholomew DJ, Steele F, Moustaki I, et al. The analysis and interpretation of multivariate data for social scientists. London, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2002.
20. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Van der Vleuten CPM, et al. Solving Problems with group work in problem- based learning: hold on to the philosophy. Med Educ 2001;5:84-9.
21. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol Rev 2004;3:235-66. (Pubitemid 38926303)
22. Van Merriënboer JJG. Training complex cognitive skills: a four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1997.
23. Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA. Ten steps to complex learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor and Francis, 2007.
24. Brown J, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. In: McLellen H, ed. Situated learning perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1996:19-44.
25. Brown JS, Duguid P. The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 2000.
26. Ericsson KA. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: Ericsson, KA, Charnes N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR, eds. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006:683-703.
27. Spiro RJ, Jehng J. Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the non-linear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In: Nix D, Spiro R.eds. Cognition, education and multimedia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990:163-205.
28. Merrill D. First principles of instruction. Educ Technol Res Dev 2002;50:43-59.
29. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs. 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.
30. Chiabura DS, Marinova SV. What predicts skill transfer? An exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy and organizational supports. Int J Training Dev (IJTD) 2005;9:110-23.
31. Gaudine A, Saks AM. A longitudinal quasi-experiment on the effects of post training transfer intentions. Human Resource Dev Quart 2004;15:57-76.
32. Raybould B. Building performance centered web-based systems, information systems, and knowledge management systems in the 21st century. In: Rossett A, ed. The ASTD E-learning handbook. Best practices, strategies, and case studies for an emerging field. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2002:338-53.
33. Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval. Program Plann 2012;35:36-245.
34. Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J. Determining usability test sample size. In: Karwowski W, ed. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2006:3084-8.
35. Concept mapping methodology biography and recent publications. Examples of concept mapping projects. Concept System incorporated 2012. http://www.conceptsystems.com/files/all/bibliography-examples-of-cm-projects-5. pdf (accessed 9 Sep 2012).