Not so primitive: Context-sensitive meta-learning about unattended sound sequences

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 99-105

  Todd, Juanita ^a,b   Provost, Alexander ^a   Whitson, Lisa R ^a   Cooper, Gavin ^a,b   Heathcote, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potential; Learning; Mismatch negativity; Perceptual inference; Salience

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SOUND;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84871886221     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00581.2012     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alho K, Woods DL, Algazi A, Knight RT, Näätänen R. Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91: 353-362, 1994.
2. Atienza M, Cantero JL. Complex sound processing during human REM sleep by recovering information from long-term memory as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Brain Res 901: 151-160, 2001.
3. Costa-Faidella J, Grimm S, Slabu L, Diaz-Santaella F, Escera C. Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 48: 774-783, 2011.
4. Escera C, Yago E, Corral MJ, Corbera S, Nunez MI. Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching. Eur J Neurosci 18: 2408-2412, 2003.
5. Friston K. Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Netw 16: 1325-1352, 2003.
6. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360: 815-836, 2005.
7. Friston K. Hierarchical models in the brain. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000211, 2008.
8. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modeling of the response to frequency deviants. J Neurophysiol 101: 2620-2631, 2009.
9. Gebhardt AL, Aslin RN, Newport EL. Changing structures in midstream: learning along the statistical garden path. Cogn Sci 33: 1087-1116, 2009.
10. Giard MH, Perrin F, Pernier J, Bouchet P. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance; a topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 27: 627-640, 1990.
11. Hall G, Honey RC. Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 15: 232-241, 1989.
12. Horváth J, Czigler I, Sussman E, Winkler I. Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences. Cogn Brain Res 12: 131-144, 2001.
13. Jacobsen T, Schröger E. Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 1133-1143, 2003.
14. Kiebel SJ, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ. A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000209, 2008.
15. Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Schröger E. The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations. Biol Psychol 74: 1-19, 2007.
16. Lubow RE, Gewirtz JC. Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychol Bull 117: 87-103, 1995.
17. Morey RD. Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 4: 61-64, 2008.
18. Näätänen R. The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 13: 201-288, 1990.
19. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992.
20. Näätänen R, Gaillard AW, Mäntysalo S. Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol (Amst) 42: 313-329, 1978.
21. Näätänen R, Kujala T, Escera C, Baldeweg T, Kreegipuu K, Carlsen S, Ponton C. The mismatch negativity (MMN)-a unique window to disturbed central auditory processing in ageing and different clinical conditions. Clin Neurophysiol 123: 424-458, 2012.
22. Näätänen R, Michie PT. Early selective attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol Psychol 8: 81-136, 1979.
23. Näätänen R, Tervaniemi M, Sussman E, Paavilainen P, Winkler I. "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci 24: 283-288, 2001.
24. Paavilainen P, Simola J, Jaramillo M, Näätänen R, Winkler I. Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology 38: 359-365, 2001.
25. Pulvermuller F, Kujala T, Shtyrov Y, Simola J, Tiitinen H, Alku P, Alho K, Martinkauppi S, Ilmoniemi RJ, Näätänen R. Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage 14: 607-616, 2001.
26. Schmidt A, Diaconescu AO, Kometer M, Friston KJ, Stephan KE, Vollen-weider FX. Modeling ketamine effects on synaptic plasticity during the mismatch negativity. Cereb Cortex (August 8, 2012). doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs238.
27. Semlitsch HV, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psycho-physiology 23: 695-703, 1986.
28. Sussman ES. A new view on the MMN and attention debate: the role of context in processing auditory events. J Psychophysiol 21: 164-175, 2007.
29. Tervaniemi M, Maury S, Näätänen R. Neural representations of abstract stimulus features in the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport 5: 844-846, 1994.
30. Todd J, Provost A, Cooper G. Lasting first impressions: a conservative bias in automatic filters of the acoustic environment. Neuropsychologia 49: 3399-3405, 2011.
31. Ulanovsky N, Las L, Nelken I. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 391-398, 2003.
32. Wacongne C, Changeux JP, Dehaene S. A neural model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. J Neurosci 32: 3665-3678, 2012.
33. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 21: 147-163, 2007.
34. Winkler I, Cowan N. From sensory to long-term memory: evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies. Exp Psychol 52: 3-20, 2005.
35. Winkler I, Karmos G, Näätänen R. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res 742: 239-252, 1996.