Integration of intermittent renewable power supply using grid-connected vehicles - A 2030 case study for California and Germany

Applied Energy

Volumn 104, Issue , 2013, Pages 666-682

  Dallinger, David ^a   Gerda, Schubert ^a   Wietschel, Martin ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Demand response; Integration of fluctuating generation; Plug in electric vehicles

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; NATURAL RESOURCES;

AGENT-BASED SIMULATION MODELS; CALIFORNIA; CAPACITY FACTORS; DEMAND RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GRID INTEGRATION; GRID-CONNECTED; INSTALLED CAPACITY; LOAD CURVES; PEAK LOAD; PLUG-INS; POWER SUPPLY; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE; RESIDUAL LOAD; SMART CHARGING;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; GERMANY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84871884179     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.065     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Awerbuch S. Portfolio-based electricity generation planning: policy implications for renewables and energy security. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2006, 11(3):693-710.
2. Rescha G., Held A., Fabera T., Panzera C., Toro F., Haasa R. Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale. Energy Policy 2008, 36(11):4048-4056.
3. Tomić J., Kempton W. Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support. J. Power Sources 2007, 168(2):459-468.
4. Stadler I. Power grid balancing of energy systems with high renewable energy penetration by demand response. Utilities Policy 2008, 16:90e98.
5. Link J, Büttner M, Dallinger D, Richter J. Optimisation algorithms for the charge dispatch of plug-in vehicles based on variable tariffs. Working paper sustainability and innovation No. S3/2010; 2010. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/36697/1/623961075.pdf.
6. Cappers P, Mills A, Goldman C, Wiser R, Eto JH. 2011. Mass market demand response and variable generation integration issues: A scoping study. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, LBNL-5063E. Prepared for the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability US Department of Energy; 2011. [accessed 31.03.12]. http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/emp/reports/lbnl-5063e.pdf.
7. Barbose G. Goldman C, Bharvirkar R, Hopper N, Ting M, Neenan B. Real time pricing as a default or optional service for C&I customers: a comparative analysis of eight case studies. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley. LBNL-57661. Prepared for California Energy Commission; 2005. [Accessed 31.03.12]. http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/57661.pdf.
8. Wolak FA. An experimental comparison of critical peak and hourly pricing: the power cents DC program. Department of Economics Stanford University; 2010. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://sedc-coalition.eu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Wolak-10-03-15-PowerCentsDC-Paper.pdf.
9. Pehnt M, Helms H, Lambrecht U, Dallinger D, Wietschel M, Heinrichs H, et al. Elektroautos in einer von erneuerbaren Energien geprägten Energiewirtschaft. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft; 2011.
10. Denholm P, Short W. An evaluation of utility system impacts and bene-fits of optimally dispatched plug-in hybrid electric vehicles an evaluation of utility system impacts and benefits of optimally dispatched plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Technical Report NREL/TP-620-40293l; 2006. [retrieved 11.07.11]. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy07osti/40293.pdf.
11. Green R.C., Wang, lam M. The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: a review and outlook. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:544e53.
12. McCarthy R., Yang C. Determining marginal electricity for near-term plug-in and fuel cell vehicle demands in California: impacts on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions. J Power Sources 2010, 195(7):2099-2109.
13. Dallinger D, Wietschel M, Santini DJ. Effect of demand response on the marginal electricity used by plug-in electric vehicles. In: Paper presented at 26th Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS-26), Los Angeles, May 6-9; 2012.
14. Foley A, Tyther B, Calnan P, Gallachóir Bó. Impacts of electric vehicle charging under electricity market operations. Appl Energy; 2012.
15. Sioshansi R., Denholm P. The value of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as grid resources. Energy J 2010, 31(3):1-22.
16. Sousa T., Morais H., Soares J., Vale Z. Day-ahead resource scheduling in smart grids considering vehicle-to-Grid and network constraints. Appl. Energy 2012, 96:183-193.
17. Dallinger D., Wietschel M. Grid integration of intermittent renewable energy sources using price-responsive plug-in electric vehicles. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16(5):3370-3382.
18. Wang J., Liu C., Ton D., Zhou Y., Kim J., Vyas A. Impact of plug-in hybr-id electric vehicles on power systems with demand response and wind power. Energy Policy 2011, 39(7):4016-4021.
19. Fernandes C., Frías P., Latorre J.M. Impact of vehicle-to-grid on power system operation costs: the Spanish case study. Appl Energy 2012, 96:194-202.
20. Markel T, Kuss M, Denholm P. Communication and control of electric drive vehicles supporting renewable. Paper presented at 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC'09), Dearborn, September 7-11; 2009.
21. Lund H., Kempton W. Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G. Energy Policy 2008, 36(9):3578-3587.
22. Sørensen P, Pinson P, Cutululis NA, Madsen H, Jensen LE, Hjerrild J, et al. Power fluctuations from large wind farms - Final report. Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Risø-R-1711(EN); 2009. [accessed 11.07.11].
23. Blarke M.B., Lund H. The effectiveness of storage and relocation options in renewable energy systems. Renew Energy 2008, 33(7):1499-1507.
24. Holttinen H. Hourly wind power variations in the Nordic countries. Wind Energy Vol 2005, 8(2):173-195.
25. CAISO: california independent system operator. 2011. 1 "33 percent trajectory case - preliminary new scenarios: File 'One-Minute Data for Load, Wind and Solar' (3/14/2011 07:44) and 'Step 1 Assumptions, Forecast Errors and Renewable Profiles' (3/11/2011 15:23). [accessed 24.10.11]. http://www.caiso.com/Documents/33%20percent%20trajectory%20case%20-%20preliminary%20new%20scenarios.
26. Solar Anywhere. Satellite solar irradiance data; 2011 [accessed 11.07.11]. https://www.solaranywhere.com/Public/About.aspx.
27. CPUC: California Public Utilities Commission. Renewable integration workshops; 2012. [accessed 31.03.12]. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/100824_workshop.htm.
28. NREL: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Western wind resources dataset; 2009. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.nrel.gov/wind/westernwind.
29. EEX: European Energy Exchange. Transparency in energy markets - Gesetzliche Veröffentlichungspflichten der übertragungsnetzbetreiber. European Energy Exchange AG -Transparenzplattform; 2011. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.transparency.eex.com/de/.
30. Meteomedia A.G. Meteorologischer Datensatz 2009, Gais, Schweiz.
31. SoDa Web Service. Solar irradiation data from HC3hourDNI; 2011.
32. Schubert G. Modellierung der Stromeinspeisung aus Windenergie für ein europäisches Strom. Seminar paper, Fraunhofer ISI and University of Flensburg; 2010.
33. Schubert G. Modellierung der stündlichen regionalen Photovoltaik- und Windstromeinspeisung in Europa auf Basis meteorologischer Daten. Master's Thesis, Fraunhofer ISI and University of Flensburg; 2011.
34. Gottschall J., Peinke J. Stochastic modelling of a wind turbine's power output with special respect to turbulent dynamics. J Phys Conf Ser 2007, 75:012045.
35. Ensslin C, Milligan M, Holttinen H, O'Malley M, Keane A; Current methods to calculate capacity credit of wind power, IEA collaboration. In: Paper presented at IEEE power and energy society general meeting - conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century, Pittsburgh, July 20-24; 2008.
36. SWK: Stadtwerke Karlsruhe GmbH. 2010. "Time series of wind and solar generation". Obtained from Dr. Ing. Thomas Schnepf, Stabsstelle Strategische Planung, October 28, 2010.
37. McLean JR, Hassan G, Partners Ltd. Trade wind WP 2.6 - equivalent wind power curves; 2008. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.trade-wind.eu/fileadmin/documents/publications/D2.4_Equivalent_Wind_Power_Curves_11914bt02c.pdf.
38. Sensfuß F. Assessment of the impact of renewable electricity generation on the German electricity sector - an agent-based simulation approach. PhD diss., Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe; 2007.
39. Sensfuß F., Ragwitz M., Genoese M. The merit-order effect: a detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany. Energy Policy 2008, 36(8):3086-3094.
40. Genoese F, Genoese M, Wietschel M. In occurrence of negative prices on the German spot market for electricity and their influence on balancing power markets. In: Paper presented at 7th international conference on the european energy market (EEM), Madrid, June 23-25; 2010.
41. Nicolosi M, Fürsch M. The impact of an increasing share of RES-E on the conventional power market - the Example of Germany. ZfE Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft 03/2009.
42. Nitsch J, Pregger T, Scholz Y, Naegler T, Sterner M, Gerhardt N, et al. Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global." Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Fraunhofer Institut für Windenergie und Energiesystemtechnik, Ingenieurbüro für neue Energien, vol. BMU - FKZ0; 2010. [accessed 11.11.11]. http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/inhalt/47034/40870/.
43. DENA: Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH: Kohler S, Agricola A-C, Seidl H. 1 dena-Netzstudie II: Integration erneuerbarer Energien in die deutsche Stromversorgung im Zeitraum 2015-2020 mit Ausblick 2025; 2010. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.dena.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Download/Dokumente/Studien___Umfragen/Endbericht_dena-Netzstudie_II.PDF.
44. Schlesinger M, et al. Energieszenarien 2011: Projekt Nr. 12/10 des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie; 2011. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.prognos.com/fileadmin/pdf/publikationsdatenbank/11_08_12_Energieszenarien_2011.pdf.
45. Schulz W, Bartels M, Gatzen C, Lindenberger D, Müsgens F. Energiereport IV-Die Entwicklung der Energiemärkte bis zum Jahr 2030, Energiewirtschaftliche Referenzprognose. EWI/Prognose; 2005. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://www.prognos.com/fileadmin/pdf/Energiereport%20IV_Kurzfassung_d.pdf.
46. METI: Ministry of Economy. Trade and industry. strategic technology roadmap (energy sector) - energy technology vision 2100; 2006. [accessed 31.03.12. http://www.iae.or.jp/2100/main.pdf.
47. Moawad A, Singh G, Hagspiel S, Fellah M, Rousseau A. Impact of real world drive cycles on PHEV fuel efficiency and cost for different powertrain and battery characteristics. Paper presented at 24th Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS-24), Stavanger, May 13-16; 2009.
48. Gonder J., Simpson A. Measuring and reporting fuel economy of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Assoc J 2007, 1.
49. Santini DJ, Vyas AD, Anderson JL. Fuel economy improvement via hybridization vs. vehicle performance level. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-1901; 2002.
50. Hadley S.W., Tsvetkova A. Potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on regional power generation. Electricity J 2009, 22(10):56-68.
51. McCarthy RW, Yang C, Ogden JM. California energy demand scenario projections to 2050, UCD-ITS-RR-08-11, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis; 2006.
52. Becker TA. 2009. Electric vehicles in the United States a new model with forecasts to 2030. Center for entrepreneurship and technology at the University of California, Berkeley; 2012. [accessed 31.03.10]. http://cet.berkeley.edu/dl/CET_Technical%20Brief_EconomicModel2030_f.pdf.
53. California Department of Transportation. 2005. California motor vehicle stock, travel and fuel forecast. [accessed 31.03.12]. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/smb/documents/mvstaff/mvstaff05.pdf.
54. Gnann T, Plötz P, Kley F. Vehicle charging infrastructure demand for the introduction of plug-in electric vehicles in Germany and the US. Paper presented at 26th Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS-26), Los Angeles, May 6-9; 2012.
55. Pacific Gas and Electric. Electric vehicle time of use tariff; 2011. [accessed 11.07.11]. http://sdge.com/clean-energy/electric-vehicles/electric-vehicles.
56. Sioshansi R., Miller J. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles can be clean and economical in dirty power systems. Energy Policy 2011, 39(10):6151-6161.
57. Schey, S, Scoffield D and Smart J. A First Look at the Impact of Electric Vehicle Charging on the Electric Grid in The EV Project. Paper presented at 26th Electric Vehicle Symposium (EVS-26), Los Angeles, May 6-9, 2012.