The Bandler-Kohout subproduct as a suitable inference mechanism

2009 International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress and 2009 European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology Conference, IFSA-EUSFLAT 2009 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 432-437

  Štěpnička, Martin ^a   Jayaram, Balasubramaniam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

Bandler Kohout subproduct; Compositional rule of inference; Correctness and continuity of inference; Fuzzy relation equations

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE REASONING; BANDLER-KOHOUT SUBPRODUCT; COMPOSITIONAL RULE OF INFERENCES; CORRECTNESS AND CONTINUITY OF INFERENCE; FUZZY RELATION EQUATIONS; INDISTINGUISHABILITY; INFERENCE MECHANISM;

FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY SETS;

FUZZY SYSTEMS;

EID: 84871870720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. I. B. Turksen and Z. Zhong. An approximate reasoning schema based on similarity measures and interval valued fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 18:1049-1056, 1988.
2. J. F. Baldwin. A new approach to approximate reasoning using fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2:309-325, 1979.
3. V. Cross and T. Sudkamp. Patterns of fuzzy rule-based inference. Int. J. of Approximate Reasoning, 11:235-255, 1994.
4. B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. Mesiar, C. Marsala, and M. Rifqi. Compositional rule of inference as an analogical scheme. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 138:56-65, 2003.
5. L. A. Zadeh. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3:28-44, 1973.
6. E. P. Klement, R. Mesiar, and E. Pap. Triangular Norms. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000.
7. Di Nola A., S. Sessa, W. Pedrycz, and E. Sanchez. Fuzzy Relation Equations and Their Applications to Knowledge Engineering. Kluwer, Boston, 1989.
8. I. Perfilieva and S. Lehmke. Correct models of fuzzy if-then rules are continuous. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157:3188-3197, 2006.
9. I. Perfilieva and V. Novak. System of fuzzy relation equations as a continuous model of IF-THEN rules. Information Sciences, 177:3218-3227, 2007.
10. F Klawonn and J. L. Castro. Similarity in fuzzy reasoning. Mathware & Soft Computing, 2:197-228, 1995.
11. B. Jayaram. On the law of importation (x A y) → z = (x → (y → z)) in fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 16:130-144, 2008.
12. W. Bandler and L. J. Kohout. Semantics of implication operators and fuzzy relational products. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 12:89-116, 1979.
13. W. Pedrycz. Applications of fuzzy relational equations for methods of reasoning in presence of fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 16:163-175, 1985.
14. V. Novak, I. Perfilieva, and J. Mockor. Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Boston, 1999.
15. M. Baczynski and B. Jayaram. Fuzzy Implications (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing series). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2008.
16. E.H. Mamdani and S. Assilian. An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 7:1-13, 1975.
17. W. J. M. Kickert and E. H. Mamdani. Analysis of a fuzzy logic controller. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1:29-44, 1978.
18. P. M. Larsen. Industrial applications of fuzzy logic control. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 12:3-10, 1980.
19. D. Dubois, H. Prade, and L. Ughetto. Checking the coherence and redundancy of fuzzy knowledge bases. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems, 5(6):398-417, 1997.
20. F Klawonn and V. Novak. The relation between inference and interpolation in the framework of fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 81(3):331-354, 1996.
21. D. Dubois and H. Prade. What are fuzzy rules and how to use them. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84:169-185, 1996.
22. V. Novak and S. Lehmke. Logical structure of fuzzy IF-THEN rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157:2003-2029, 2006.
23. L. Godo and P. Hájek. A note on fuzzy inference as deduction. In D. Dubois, E. P. Klement, and H. Prade, editors, Fuzzy Sets, Logics and Reasoning about Knowledge (Applied Logic series Vol.15), pages 237-241. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999.
24. P. Hájek. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998.
25. U. Bodenhofer, M. Daňková, M. Štěpnič ka, and V. Novák. A plea for the usefulness of the deductive interpretation of fuzzy rules in engineering applications. In Proc. of FUZZ-IEEE'07, pages 1567-1572, London, 2007.
26. T. Vetterlein and M. Štěpnička. Completing fuzzy if-then rule bases by means of smoothing splines. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Syst., 14:235-244, 2006.
27. E. Sanchez. Resolution of composite fuzzy relation equations. Inform. and Control, 30:38-48, 1976.
28. B. De Baets. Analytical solution methods for fuzzy relation equations. In D. Dubois and H. Prade, editors, The Handbook of Fuzzy Set Series Vol. 1, volume 15. 2000.
29. F. Klawonn. Fuzzy points, fuzzy relations and fuzzy functions. In V. Novák and I. Perfilieva, editors, Discovering the World with Fuzzy Logic, pages 431-453. Springer, Berlin, 2000.
30. B. De Baets and R. Mesiar. T-partitions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 97:211-223, 1998.
31. M. Štěpnička, B. De Baets, and L. Nosková. On additive and multiplicative fuzzy models. In M. Štěpnička, V. Novák, and U. Bodenhofer, editors, New Dimensions in Fuzzy Logic and Related Technologies, Int. Conference EUSFLAT 2007, Ostrava, Proceedings, volume 2, pages 95-102, Ostrava, 2007.
32. L. Nosková. Systems of fuzzy relation equation with inf→ composition: solvability and solutions. J. of Electrical Eng., 12(s):69-72, 2005.
33. S. Gottwald. An abstract approach toward the evaluation of fuzzy rule systems. In P.P. Wang, D. Ruan, and E.E. Kerre, editors, Fuzzy Logic. A Spectrum of Theoretical & Practical Issues (Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing 215), pages 281-297. Springer-Verlag, 2007.