The perception gap: Radiation and risk

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 67-75

  Slovic, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

nuclear power; radiation; radon; risk communication; risk perception; stigma; x rays

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871807771     PISSN: 00963402     EISSN: 19383282     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0096340212444870     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Associated Press (1986) Task force officials insist all US reactors are safe. Spartanburg Herald-Journal, May 7, p. A5. Available at: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1876&dat=19860507&id= nEQsAAAAIBAJ&sjid=pYoFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5491,2698586.
2. Cohen BL, Lee IS. A catalog of risks. Health Physics. 1979 ; 36: 707-722
3. Drottz B, Sjöberg L. Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1990 ; 10 (2). 135-149
4. Erikson K. Toxic reckoning: Business faces a new kind of fear. Harvard Business Review. 1990 ; 68 (1). 118-126
5. Erikson K. Radiation's lingering dread. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1991 ; 47 (2). 34-39
6. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, et al. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences. 1978 ; 9: 127-152
7. Risk, Media, and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology. Flynn J Slovic P Kunreuther H, ed. London: Earthscan ; 2001 :
8. Gadomska M In: Radiation and Society: Comprehending Radiation Risk I. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency ; 1994: 147-166.
9. GieseckeJABurnsWJBarrettA (2011) Assessment of the regional economic impacts of catastrophic events: CGE analysis of resource loss and behavioral effects of a RDD attack scenario. Risk Analysis, January 14. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01567.x/abstract.
10. HardemanFCarléBEggermontG (2004) Ionizing radiation as perceived by the population: The good, the bad and the ugly. Madrid: 11th International Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association, May 23-28. Available at: irpa11.irpa.net/pdfs/9c1.pdf.
11. Huyskens C Problems in Risk Comparisons I. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency ; 1994 :
12. Jenkins-Smith HC Public beliefs, concerns and preferences regarding the management of used nuclear fuels and high level radioactive waste. Washington, DC: : US Energy Department Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, February. Available at: http://brc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/hank- jenkinssmith-brc-paper-final.pdf.; 2011.
13. Krewski D, Lemyre L, Turner MC, et al. Public perception of population health risks in Canada: Health hazards and sources of information. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 2006 ; 12 (4). 626-644
14. LeiserowitzAMaibachERoser-RenoufC (2011) Climate Change in the American Mind: Public Support for Climate and Energy Policies in May 2011. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, May. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/ climate/files/PolicySupportMay2011.pdf.
15. MacGregor DG Communication about Radiation Exposure: Effects of Science Education on Radiation Decisions. Washington, DC: US Energy Department Low-Dose Radiation Research Program ; 2002.
16. MacGregor DG, Flynn J, Mertz CK, et al Perception of radiation exposure: Part II. Communicating about radiation exposure and health effects. In: Low Dose, Risk, Decisions, & Risk Communication. Washington, DC: US Energy Department Low-Dose Radiation Research Program ; 2002a :
17. MacGregor DG, Flynn J, Slovic P, et al Perception of radiation exposure: Part I. Perception of risk and judgment of harm. In: Low Dose, Risk, Decisions, & Risk Communication. Washington, DC: US Energy Department Low-Dose Radiation Research Program ; 2002b :
18. MacKinnonM (2011) For Japanese, Fukushima spells fear. The Globe and Mail, October 12. Available at: www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/asia-pacific/ for-japanese-fukushima-spells-fear/article2199182/.
19. National Research Council Improving Risk Communication. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. ; 1989 :
20. Otway H, Haastrup P, Connell W, et al. Risk communication in Europe after Chernobyl: A media analysis of seven countries. Industrial Crisis Quarterly. 1988 ; 2: 31-35
21. Petterson JS. Perception vs. reality of radiological impact: The Goiania model. Nuclear News. 1988 ; 31 (14). 84-90
22. Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ; 2003 :
23. Ramana MV. Nuclear power and the public. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2011 ; 67 (4). 43-51
24. Ropeik D How Risky Is It, Really? Why Our Fears Don't Always Match the Facts. New York: McGraw-Hill ; 2010 :
25. Sandman PM, Weinstein ND, Klotz ML. Public response to the risk from geological radon. Journal of Communication. 1987 ; 37 (3). 93-108
26. The Perception of Risk. Slovic P, ed. London: Earthscan ; 2000 :
27. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Rating the risks. Environment. 1979a ; 21 (3). 14-20
28. Slovic P, Flynn J, Layman M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science. 1991a ; 254 (5038). 1603-1607
29. Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B Images of disaster: Perception and acceptance of risks from nuclear power. Energy Risk Assessment. Goodman G Rowe W, ed. London: Academic Press ; 1979b: 223-245.
30. Slovic P, Kraus N, Lappe H, et al. Risk perception of prescription drugs: Report on a survey in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 1991b ; 82: S15 - S20
31. Smith KR. Perception of risks associated with nuclear power. Energy Environment Monitor. 1988 ; 4 (1). 61-70
32. Sowby FD. Radiation and other risks. Health Physics. 1965 ; 11: 879-887
33. Tengs TO, Adams ME, Pliskin JS, et al. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost effectiveness. Risk Analysis. 1995 ; 15 (3). 369-390
34. Weart SA Nuclear Fear: A History of Images. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ; 1988 :
35. Wynne B. Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information. Environment. 1989 ; 31 (2). 10-15