Simulation of membrane-based CO2 capture in a coal-fired power plant

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 427, Issue , 2013, Pages 451-459

  Shao, Pinghai ^a   Dal Cin, Mauro M ^a   Guiver, Michael D ^a   Kumar, Ashwani ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Capital and operating cost; CO2 capture; Flue gas; Liquefaction: cost of energy; Membrane; Permeance; Power demand; Process optimization; Selectivity

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL AND OPERATING COSTS; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; FEED VOLUME; GAS STREAMS; MEMBRANE AREA; MEMBRANE PROCESS; MINIMAL POWER; PERMEANCE; POWER DEMANDS; SIMULATION STUDIES; VACUUM OPERATIONS;

CATALYST SELECTIVITY; COAL; COAL FUELED FURNACES; FIRE TUBE BOILERS; FLUE GASES; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; LIQUEFACTION; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; MEMBRANES; OPERATING COSTS; OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE; COAL FIRED POWER PLANT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); COST; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; ENERGY RECOVERY; FLUE GAS; GAS TRANSPORT; LIQUEFACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; VACUUM;

EID: 84871807543     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.044     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. International Energy Agency, Key World Energy Statistics, Paris, France, 2009. http://www.ieea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2009/key_stats_2009.pdf.
2. Merkel T.C., Lin H., Wei X., Baker R. Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: an opportunity for membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 359:126-139.
3. 2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:1-9.
4. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H.C. De Coninck, M. Loos, L.A. Meyer (Eds.).
5. Farve E., Bounacer R., Roizard D. Biogas, membranes and carbon dioxide capture(Rapid communication). J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 328:11-14.
6. H.P. Mangalapally, H. Hasse, Pilot plant experiments with MEA and new solvents for post-combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption, in: A.B. de Haan, H. Kooijman, A. Gorak (Eds.), Distillation and Absorption, Conference Proceedings, 12-15 Sep 2010, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. pp. 103-108.
7. J.M. Klara, Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, US Department of Energy, DOE/NETL-2007/128, 2007.
8. 2 capture. Science 2009, 325:1652-1654.
9. 2 capture from flue gases using pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:4883-4890.
10. Membrane materials, performance, and modules under the test of pilot-scale flue gas CO2 capture. Available from: http://www.nanoglowa.com/membranes.html.
11. 2 capture applications. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10:372-375.
12. 2 recovery from flue gas. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423-424:302-313.
13. 2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 378:479-484.
14. Favre E. Carbon dioxide recovery from post-combustion processes: can gas permeation membrane compete with absorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 294:50-59.
15. Favre E., Syendsen H.F. Membrane contactors for intensified post-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas-liquid absorption processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 407-408:1-7.
16. Deng L., Kim T.-J., Hägg M.-B. Novel fixed-site-carrier polyvinyamine membrane for carbon dioxide capture. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 2004, 42:426-436.
17. Zhao L., Riensche E., Blum L., Stolten D. Multi-stage gas separation membrane processes used in post-combustion capture: Energetic and economic analyses. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 359:160-172.
18. Arai Y., Kaminishi G., Saito S. The experimental determination of the PVTX relations for the carbon-nitrogen and carbon dioxide-methane systems. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1971, 4:113-122.
19. Stern S.A. Polymers for gas separation: the next decade (Review). J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 94:1-65.
20. Koros W.J., Fleming G.K. Membrane-based gas separation (Review). J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83:1-80.
21. Koros W.J., Fleming G.K., Jordan S.M., Kim T.H., Hoehn H.H. Polymeric membrane materials for solution-diffusion based permeation separations. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1988, 13:339-401.
22. Thundyil M.J., Koros W.J. Mathematical modeling of gas separation permeators for radial crossflow, countercurrent and concurrent hollow fiber membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125:275-291.
23. Shao P., Dal-Cin M., Kumar A., Li H.B., Singh D.P. Design and economics of a hybrid membrane-temperature swing adsorption process for upgrading biogas. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413-414:17-28.
24. Feasibility Study-Biogas Upgrading and Grid Injection in the Fraser Valley, British Columbia, Prepared by: Electrigaz Technologies Inc., Final Report, 2008, p. 23.
25. 2 capture from flue gas using membrane technology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47:1562-1568.
26. E.S. Rubin, A.B. Rao, C. Chen, Understanding the cost of CO2 capture and storage for fossil fuel power plants, in: Proceedings for 28th International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems, Clearwater, FL, 2003.
27. M. Matuszewski, Research and Development for CO2 Capture Technology, A Report of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL, USA), December, 2011.