The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes

Cognition

Volumn 126, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 198-212

  Võ, Melissa L H ^a   Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodic memory; Eye movements; Repeated and multiple search; Scene perception; Search guidance; Semantic memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ENVIRONMENT; EPISODIC MEMORY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SEMANTICS; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; ENVIRONMENT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MEMORY, EPISODIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84871779489     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Boot W.R., McCarley J.M., Kramer A.F., Peterson M.S. Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2004, 5:854-861.
2. Brady T.F., Konkle T., Alvarez G.A., Oliva A. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2008, 105(38):14325-14329.
3. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cuing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:1177-1187.
4. Brockmole J.R., Henderson J.M. Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:99-108.
5. Brockmole J.R., Võ M.L.-H. Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2010, 72(7):1803-1813.
6. Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32(4):699-706.
7. Brooks D.I., Rasmussen I.P., Hollingworth A. The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36(6):1406-1418.
8. Castelhano M., Henderson J.M. Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:753-763.
9. Castelhano M.S., Heaven C. The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2010, 72(5):1283-1297.
10. Castelhano M., Henderson J.M. Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition 2005, 12:1017-1040.
11. Castelhano M.S., Pollatsek A., Cave K.R. Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:795-801.
12. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
13. Chun M.M., Turk-Browne N.B. Associative learning mechanisms in vision. Visual memory 2008, 209-245. Oxford University Press, Oxford. S.J. Luck, A.R. Hollingworth (Eds.).
14. Droll J., Eckstein M. Expected object position of two hundred fifty observers predicts first fixations of seventy seven separate observers during search. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(6):320.
15. Ehinger K.A., Hidalgo-Sotelo B., Torralba A., Oliva A. Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition 2009, 17(6):945-978.
16. Gibson B.S., Li L., Skow E., Brown K., Cooke L. Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science 2000, 11(4):324-327.
17. Gilchrist I.D., Harvey M. Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology 2000, 10:1209-1212.
18. Henderson, J., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Scene perception for psycholinguists. The interface of language. In J. M. Henderson, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 1-58). NY: Psychology Press.
19. Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2005). Human learning of contextual priors for object search: Where does the time go? Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) - Workshops (Vol. 3, pp. 86-93).
20. Hollingworth, A. (in press). Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: Commentary on Võ and Wolfe (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
21. Hollingworth A. Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:273-291.
22. Hollingworth A. Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:781-807.
23. Hollingworth A. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30:519-537.
24. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:113-136.
25. Hollingworth A., Williams C.C., Henderson J.M. To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2001, 8:761-768.
26. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394(August 6), 575-577.
27. Hout M.C., Goldinger S.D. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38:90-112.
28. Hout M.C., Goldinger S.D. Learning in repeated visual search. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics 2010, 72:1267-1282.
29. Howard C.J., Pharaon R.G., Körner C., Smith A.D., Gilchrist I.D. Visual search in the real world: Evidence for the formation of distractor representations. Perception 2011, 40:1143-1153.
30. Klein R.M., MacInnes W.J. Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science 1999, 10(4):346-352.
31. Konkle T., Brady T.F., Alvarez G.A., Oliva A. Scene memory is more detailed than you think: The role of scene categories in visual long-term memory. Psychological Science 2010, 21(11):1551-1556.
32. Körner C., Gilchrist I.D. Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Research 2008, 72:99-105.
33. Körner C., Gilchrist I.D. Finding a new target in an old display: Evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2007, 14(5):846-851.
34. Kristjansson A. In search of remembrance. Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science 2000, 11:328-332.
35. Kunar M.A., Flusberg S.J., Wolfe J.M. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2008, 70(2):314-328.
36. Kunar M.A., Flusberg S.J., Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33(4):816-828.
37. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(11) (Article no. 8).
38. Melcher, D. (2006). Accumulation and persistence of memory for natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 6(1), 8-17.
39. Neider M.B., Zelinsky G.J. Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:1-10.
40. Oliva A., Wolfe J.M., Arsenio H.C. Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2004, 30(6):1132-1146.
41. Peterson M.S., Beck M.R., Vomela M. Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory. Perception and Psychophysics 2007, 69(1):123-135.
42. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F., Wang R.F., Irwin D.E., McCarley J.S. Visual search has memory. Psychological Science 2001, 12:287-292.
43. Schmidt J., Zelinsky G.J. Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1904-1914.
44. Solman G.J.F., Smilek D. Item-specific location memory in visual search. Vision Research 2010, 50:2430-2438.
45. Standing L. Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1973, 25:207-222.
46. Takeda Y., Yagi A. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62(5):927-934.
47. Tatler B.W., Melcher D. Pictures in mind: Initial encoding of object properties varies with the realism of the scene stimulus. Perception 2007, 36:1715-1729.
48. Tatler B.W., Gilchrist I.D., Land M.F. Visual memory for objects in natural scenes: From fixations to object files. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 2005, 58A(5):931-960.
49. Tatler B.W., Gilchrist I.D., Rusted J. The time course of abstract visual representation. Perception 2003, 32(5):579-592.
50. Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M.S., Henderson J.M. Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review 2006, 113:766-786.
51. Vickery, T. J., King, L.-W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1) (Article no. 8).
52. Võ, M. L. -H., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). The time course of initial scene processing for guidance of eye movements when searching natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 1-13 (Article no. 14).
53. Võ M.L.-H., Wolfe J.M. When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, 38(1):23-41.
54. Võ, M. L. -H., Schneider, W. X., & Matthias, E. (2008). Transsaccadic scene memory revisited: A 'Theory of Visual Attention (TVA)' based approach to recognition memory and confidence for objects in naturalistic scenes. Journal of Eye-Movement Research, 2(2), 1-13 (Article no. 7).
55. Williams C.C., Henderson J.M., Zacks R.T. Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics 2005, 67:816-827.
56. Wolfe J.M., Klempen N., Dahlen K. Post-attentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(2):693-716.
57. Wolfe J.M., Alvarez G.A., Rosenholtz R.E., Kuzmova Y.I. Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 2011, 73:1650-1671.
58. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99-119). Oxford University Press.
59. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2004, 5:495-501.
60. Wolfe J.M., Võ M.L.-H., Evans K.K., Greene M.R. Visual search in scenes involves selective and non-selective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2011, 15(2):77-84.