Modeling reverse draw solute flux in forward osmosis with external concentration polarization in both sides of the draw and feed solution

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 427, Issue , 2013, Pages 365-374

  Suh, Changwon ^a   Lee, Seockheon ^b  

^a Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

External concentration polarization; Forward osmosis; Internal concentration polarization; Reverse draw solute flux

Indexed keywords

ASYMMETRIC MEMBRANES; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; CROSS FLOWS; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; DEVELOPED MODEL; FEED SOLUTION; FORWARD OSMOSIS; MODELING STUDIES; OPERATING CONDITION; PHYSICAL PROCESS; PREDICTED PERFORMANCE; SOLUTE CONCENTRATIONS; SOLUTE FLUX; SUPPORT LAYER; WATER FLUX;

OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

WATER;

ARTICLE; CROSS FLOW VELOCITY; EXTERNAL CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; FLUID TRANSPORT; FORWARD OSMOSIS; INTERNAL CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; MODEL; OSMOSIS; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE DRAW SOLUTE FLUX; SIMULATION; SOLUTE; VELOCITY;

EID: 84871760988     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.033     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, J. Wiley, Chichester, New York. 2nd ed.
2. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8625-8629.
3. McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007, 207:370-382.
4. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 2005, 174:1-11.
5. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:114-123.
6. Kravath R.E., Davis J.A. Desalination of sea-water by direct osmosis. Desalination 1975, 16.
7. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. A novel hybrid forward osmosis - nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: draw solution selection and system configuration. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 13:356-361.
8. Choi J.S., Kim H., Lee S., Hwang T.M., Oh H., Yang D.R., Kim J.H. Theoretical investigation of hybrid desalination system combining reverse osmosis and forward osmosis. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010, 15:114-120.
9. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Marchand E.A., Childress A.E. The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 2009, 239:10-21.
10. Holloway R.W., Childress A.E., Dennett K.E., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. 2007, 41:4005-4014.
11. Cornelissen E.R., Harmsen D., de Korte K.F., Ruiken C.J., Qin J.J., Oo H., Wessels L.P. Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 319:158-168.
12. Cartinella J.L., Cath T.Y., Flynn M.T., Miller G.C., Hunter K.W., Childress A.E. Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:7381-7386.
13. Petrotos K.B., Quantick P., Petropakis H. A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane-module configuration. I. The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 150:99-110.
14. Petrotos K.B., Quantick P.C., Petropakis H. Direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane-module configuration. II. The effect of using clarified tomato juice on the process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 160:171-177.
15. Garcia-Castello E.M., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 338:61-66.
16. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power-generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8:141-171.
17. Seppala A., Lampinen M.J. Thermodynamic optimizing of pressure-retarded osmosis power generation systems. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 161:115-138.
18. Achilli A., Cath T.Y., Childress A.E. Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:42-52.
19. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:5170-5176.
20. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6769-6775.
21. Cath T.Y., Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281:70-87.
22. Lay W.C.L., Liu Y., Fane A.G. Impacts of salinity on the performance of high retention membrane bioreactors for water reclamation: a review. Water Res. 2010, 44:21-40.
23. Tang C.Y.Y., She Q.H., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 354:123-133.
24. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 365:34-39.
25. Hoek E.M.V., Kim A.S., Elimelech M. Influence of crossflow membrane filter geometry and shear rate on colloidal fouling in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration separations. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, 19:357-372.
26. Hoek E.M.V., Elimelech M. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5581-5588.
27. Lee S., Cho J., Elimelech M. Influence of colloidal fouling and feed water recovery on salt rejection of RO and NF membranes. Desalination 2004, 160:1-12.
28. Herzberg M., Elimelech M. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: role of biofilm-enhanced osmotic pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 295:11-20.
29. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129:243-249.
30. Yong J.S., Phillip W.A., Elimelech M. Coupled reverse draw solute permeation and water flux in forward osmosis with neutral draw solutes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 392-393:9-17.
31. Gruber M.F., Johnson C.J., Tang C.Y., Jensen M.H., Yde L., Helix-Nielsen C. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:488-495.
32. Song X.X., Liu Z.Y., Sun D.R.D.L. Nano gives the answer: breaking the bottleneck of internal concentration polarization with a nanofiber composite forward osmosis membrane for a high water production rate. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23:3256.
33. Mehta G.D., Loeb S. Performance of permasep B-9 and B- 10 membranes in various osmotic regions and at high osmotic pressures. J. Membr. Sci. 1979, 4:335-349.
34. Zhao S.A.F., Zou L.D. Relating solution physicochemical properties to internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:459-467.
35. Gray G.T., McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 2006, 197:1-8.
36. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:237-247.
37. Ng H.Y., Tang W.L., Wong W.S. Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:2408-2413.
38. Dullien F.A.L. Porous Media: Fluid Transport and Pore Structure 1992, Academic Press, San Diego. 2nd ed.
39. Tan C.H., Ng H.Y. Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 324:209-219.
40. Gu B., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Yang D.R. Mathematical model of flat sheet membrane modules for FO process: plate-and-frame module and spiral-wound module. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:403-415.
41. Chou S.R., Shi L., Wang R., Tang C.Y.Y., Qiu C.Q., Fane A.G. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination 2010, 261:365-372.
42. Wang R., Shi L., Tang C.Y.Y., Chou S.R., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 355:158-167.
43. Xiao D.Z., Tang C.Y.Y., Zhang J.S., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: implications for FO membrane selection and system operation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 366:314-324.
44. Sagiv A., Semiat R. Finite element analysis of forward osmosis process using NaCl solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 379:86-96.
45. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Field R., Fane A.G. Modeling double-skinned FO membranes. Desalination 2011, 283:178-186.
46. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AICHE J. 2007, 53:1736-1744.
47. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3812-3818.
48. Su J.C., Chung T.S. Sublayer structure and reflection coefficient and their effects on concentration polarization and membrane performance in FO processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376:214-224.
49. Jung D.H., Lee J., Kim D.Y., Lee Y.G., Park M., Lee S., Yang D.R., Kim J.H. Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions. Desalination 2011, 277:83-91.
50. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Grunwald S., Bishop T., Diluzio A., Srinivasan R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J. Hydrol. 2006, 324:10-23.
51. Holvoet K., van Griensven A., Seuntjens P., Vanrolleghem P.A. Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT. Phys. Chem. Earth 2005, 30:518-526.
52. Park M., Lee J.J., Lee S., Kim J.H. Determination of a constant membrane structure parameter in forward osmosis processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375:241-248.