Changes in Odor Background Affect the Locomotory Response to Pheromone in Moths

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Party, Virginie ^a   Hanot, Christophe ^a   Büsser, Daniela Schmidt ^a   Rochat, Didier ^a   Renou, Michel ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WALKING;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOVEMENT; ODORS; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR NEURONS; PHEROMONES; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SMELL; SPODOPTERA; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; SPODOPTERA LITTORALIS;

EID: 84871749643     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052897     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kaissling KE, (2004) Physiology of pheromone reception in insects (an example of moths). Anir 6: 73-91.
2. Willis MA, Avondet JL, Zheng E, (2011) The role of vision in odor-plume tracking by walking and flying insects. The Journal of Experimental Biology 214: 4121-4132.
3. Sakuma M, (2002) Virtual reality experiments on a digital servosphere: guiding male silkworm moths to a virtual odour source. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 35: 243-254.
4. Niinemets Ü, Loreto F, Reichstein M, (2004) Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends in Plant Science 9: 180-186.
5. Kolosova N, Gorenstein N, Kish CM, Dudareva N, (2001) Regulation of circadian methyl benzoate emission in diurnally and nocturnally emitting plants. The Plant Cell Online 13: 2333-2347.
6. Loughrin JH, Manukian A, Heath RR, Turlings TCJ, (1994) Diurnal cycle of emission of induced volatile terpenoids by herbivore-injured cotton plants. Plant biology 91: 11836-11840.
7. Bruce TJ, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM, (2005) Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends in Plant Science 10: 269-274.
8. Byers J, Zhang Q-H, Birgersson G, (2004) Avoidance of nonhost plants by a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in a forest of odors. Naturwissenschaften 91: 215-219.
9. Schröder R, Hilker M, (2008) The relevance of background odor in ressource location by insects: a behavioral approach. BioScience 58: 308-316.
10. Landolt PJ, Phillips TW, (1997) Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 371-391.
11. Reddy GVP, Guerrero A, (2004) Interactions of insect pheromones and plant semiochemicals. Trends in Plant Science 9: 253-261.
12. Deng J-Y, Wei H-Y, Huang Y-P, Du J-W, (2004) Enhancement of attraction to sex pheromones of Spodoptera exigua by volatile compounds produced by host plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 2037-2045.
13. Light DM, Flath RA, Buttery RG, Zalom FG, Rice RE, et al. (1993) Host-plant green-leaf volatiles synergize the synthetic sex pheromones of the corn earworm and codling moth (Lepidoptera). Chemoecology 4: 145-152.
14. Schmidt-Büsser D, von Arx M, Guerin P, (2009) Host plant volatiles serve to increase the response of male European grape berry moths, Eupoecilia ambiguella, to their sex pheromone. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 195: 853-864.
15. Jactel H, Birgersson G, Andersson S, Schlyter F, (2011) Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth. Oecologia 166: 703-711.
16. Hansson BS, Anton S, (2000) Function and morphology of the antennal lobe: New developments. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 203-231.
17. Ochieng SA, Park KC, Baker TC, (2002) Host plant volatiles synergise responses of sex pheromone-specific olfactory receptor neurons in male Helicoverpa zea. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 188: 325-333.
18. Party V, Hanot C, Saïd I, Rochat D, Renou M, (2009) Plant terpenes affect intensity and temporal parameters of pheromone detection in a moth. Chemical Senses 34: 763-774.
19. Minoli S, Kauer I, Colson V, Party V, Renou M, et al. (2012) Brief exposure to sensory cues elicits stimulus-nonspecific general sensitization in an insect. PLoS One.
20. Rouyar A, Party V, Presern J, Blejec A, Renou M, (2011) A general odorant background affects the coding of pheromone stimulus intermittency in specialist olfactory receptor neurones. PLoS One 6: e26443.
21. Thorpe CM, Petrovic V, Wilkie DM, (2002) How rats process spatiotemporal information in the face of distraction. Behavioural Processes 58: 79-90.
22. Chan AAY-H, David Stahlman W, Garlick D, Fast CD, Blumstein DT, et al. (2010) Increased amplitude and duration of acoustic stimuli enhance distraction. Animal behaviour 80: 1075-1079.
23. Parmentier FBR, Elford G, Escera C, Andrés P, Miguel IS, (2008) The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition 106: 408-432.
24. Raguso RA, Pichersky E, (1999) A day in the life of a linalool molecule: Chemical communication in a plant-pollinator system. Part 1: linalool biosynthesis in flowering plants. Plant Species Biology 14: 95-120.
25. Röse USR, Manukian A, Heath RR, Tumlinson JH, (1996) Volatile semiochemicals released from undamaged cotton leaves (a systemic response of living plants to caterpillar damage). Plant Physiology 111: 487-495.
26. Kesselmeier J, Staudt M, (1999) Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 33: 23-88.
27. Kaissling KE, (1974) Sensory transduction in insect olfactory receptors. Biochemistry of sensory functions 25: 243-273.
28. Ljungberg H, Anderson P, Hansson BS, (1993) Physiology and morphology of pheromone-specific sensilla on the antennae of male and female Spodoptera littoralis (lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 39: 253-260.
29. Quero C, Lucas P, Renou M, Guerrero A, (1996) Behavioral responses of Spodoptera littoralis males to sex pheromone components and virgin females in wind tunnel. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 1087-1102.
30. Pézier A, Acquistapace A, Renou M, Rospars J-P, Lucas P, (2007) Ca2+ stabilizes the membrane potential of moth olfactory receptor neurons at rest and is essential for their fast repolarization. Chemical Senses 32: 305-317.
31. Kaissling KE, Thorson J (1980) Insect olfactory sensilla: structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization. In: Sattelle DB, Hall LM, Hildebrand JG, editors. Receptors for neurotransmitters, hormones and pheromones in insects. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press. 261-282.
32. Marion-Poll F, (1995) Object-oriented approach to fast display of electrophysiological data under MS-Windows(TM). Journal of Neuroscience Methods 63: 197-204.
33. Blejec A, (2005) Statistical method for detection of firing rate changes in spontaneously active neurons. Neurocomputing 65-66: 557-563.
34. Barrozo RB, Lazzari CR, (2004) The response of the blood-sucking bug Triatoma infestans to carbon dioxide and other host odours. Chemical Senses 29: 319-329.
35. Barrozo RB, Gadenne C, Anton S, (2010) Switching attraction to inhibition: mating-induced reversed role of sex pheromone in an insect. Journal of Experimental Biology 213: 2933-2939.
36. Jönsson M, Anderson P, (1999) Electrophysiological response to herbivore-induced host plant volatiles in the moth Spodoptera littoralis. Physiological Entomology 24: 377-385.
37. Ditzen M, Pellegrino M, Vosshall LB, (2008) Insect odorant receptors are molecular targets of the insect repellent DEET. Science 319: 1838-1842.
38. Syed Z, Leal WS (2008) Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 13598-13603.
39. Berti S, (2008) Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology 45: 608-620.
40. Chan AAY-H, Giraldo-Perez P, Smith S, Blumstein DT, (2010) Anthropogenic noise affects risk assessment and attention: the distracted prey hypothesis. Biology Letters 6: 458-461.
41. Neil SJ, Elwood RW, (1986) Factors influencing shell investigation in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus. Ethology 73: 225-234.
42. Moorhouse JE, Fosbrooke IHM, Ludlow AR, (1987) Stopping a walking locust with sound: an analysis of variation in behavioural threshold. Experimental biology 46: 193-201.
43. Moorhouse JE, Ludlow AR, Fosbrooke IHM, (1990) The control of walking behaviour in locusts: interactions between competing reflex systems. Animal behaviour 39: 613-619.
44. Svensson GP, Löfstedt C, Skals N, (2004) The odour makes the difference: male moths attracted by sex pheromones ignore the threat by predatory bats. Oikos 104: 91-97.
45. Svensson GP, Löfstedt C, Skals N, (2007) Listening in pheromone plumes: Disruption of olfactory-guided mate attraction in a moth by a bat-like ultrasound. Journal of Insect Science 7: 1-9.