Prediction analysis of a wastewater treatment system using a Bayesian network

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 40, Issue , 2013, Pages 140-150

  Li, Dan ^a   Yang, Hai Zhen ^a   Liang, Xiao Feng ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Inference; Modified sequencing batch reactor; Prediction analysis

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORK MODELS; BIOLOGICAL REACTION; DECISION SUPPORTS; DYNAMIC PROCESS; EFFLUENT CONCENTRATIONS; EFFLUENT QUALITY; INFERENCE; INFLUENT LOADS; MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; NETWORK-BASED APPROACH; OPERATING CONDITION; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; PHYSICAL DATA; PHYSICAL FACTORS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; FORECASTING; RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER QUALITY;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA SET; DECISION MAKING; EFFLUENT; PREDICTION; WASTEWATER; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 84871727347     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aguilera P.A., et al. Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26:1376-1388.
2. Alameddine I., et al. An evaluation of automated structure learning with Bayesian networks: an application to estuarine chlorophyll dynamics. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26:163-172.
3. Berzuini C., et al. Bayesian networks for patient monitoring. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 1992, 4:243-260.
4. Borsuk M.E., et al. Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network. Ecological Modelling 2006, 192:224-244.
5. Borsuk M.E., et al. A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis. Ecological Modelling 2004, 173:219-239.
6. Bromley J., et al. The use of Hugin to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environmental Modelling and Software 2005, 20:231-242.
7. Castelletti A., Soncini-Sessa R. Bayesian networks and participatory modelling in water resource management. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22:1075-1088.
8. Chen S.H., Pollino C.A. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 37:134-145.
9. Chong H.G., Walley W.J. Rule-based versus probabilistic approaches to the diagnosis of faults in wastewater treatment processes. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 1996, 10:265-273.
10. Cote M., et al. Dynamic modelling of the activated sludge process: improving prediction using neural networks. Water Research 1995, 29:995-1004.
11. Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M., 1996. Discretizing continuous attributes while learning Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 157-165.
12. Gernaey K.V., et al. Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environmental Modelling and Software 2004, 19:763-783.
13. Grois E., et al. Bayesian network models for generation of crisis management training scenarios. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence - Conference Proceedings 1998, 1113-1120. AAAI, Madison, WI, USA. Anon (Ed.).
14. Gujer W., et al. Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Science and Technology 1999, 39:183. AR1-AR1.
15. Hautaniemi S.K., et al. Target Identification with Bayesian Networks. Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering 2000, vol. 4051. SPIE, Orlando, FL, USA, 55-66.
16. Henriksen H.J., et al. Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22:1101-1113.
17. Henze, M., 2007. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASMS. Scientific and Technical Report.
18. Henze M., et al. Activated sludge model no. 2d, ASM2d. Water Science and Technology 1999, 39:165-182.
19. Jensen F.V. Introduction to Bayesian Networks 1996, Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc.
20. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2007, Springer Verlag.
21. Lee H., et al. Application of remote monitoring and automatic control system using neural network for small wastewater treatment plants in Korea. Water Science and Technology 2005, 51:249-257.
22. Molina J.L., et al. Integrated water resources management of overexploited hydrogeological systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Environmental Modelling and Software 2010, 25:383-397.
23. Murphy K. The bayes net toolbox for matlab. Computing Science and Statistics 2001, 33:331-351.
24. Myllymaki P., et al. B-course: a Web Service for Bayesian Data Analysis 2001, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Dallas, TX, United states, 247-256.
25. Pearl J. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 1986, 29.
26. Pearl J. Bayesian Networks 1995, Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, pp. 149-153.
27. Pearl, J. (Ed.) 1995b. Bayesian Networks.
28. Pollino C.A., et al. Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22:1140-1152.
29. Pradhan M., et al. The sensitivity of belief networks to imprecise probabilities: an experimental investigation. Artificial Intelligence 1996, 85:363-397.
30. Sahely B.S.G.E., Bagley D.M. Diagnosing upsets in anaerobic wastewater treatment using Bayesian belief networks. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2001, 127:302-310.
31. Shwe M.A., et al. Probabilistic diagnosis using a reformulation of the INTERNIST-1/QMR knowledge base. I. The probabilistic model and interference algorithms. Methods of Information in Medicine 1991, 30:241-255.
32. Spirtes P., Glymour C. An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs. Social Science Computer Review 1991, 9:62-72.
33. Stow C.A., et al. Comparison of Estuarine water quality models for total maximum daily load development in Neuse River Estuary. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2003, 129:307-314.
34. Uusitalo L. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:312-318.
35. Varis O. Belief Networks for modelling and assessment of environmental change. Environmetrics 1995, 6:439-444.
36. Varis O., Keskinen M. Policy analysis for the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: a Bayesian network model approach. International Journal of Water Resources Development 2006, 22:417-431.
37. Varis o., Kuikka S. Bayesian approach to expert judgement elicitation with case studies on climatic change impact assessment on surface waters. Climatic Change 1997, 37:539-563.
38. Yang H.Z. Mechanism and Technology Process Experiment to MSBR Process for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removals of Municipal Wastewater 2001, Tongji University, Shanghai.
39. Young W.A., et al. Modeling net ecosystem metabolism with an artificial neural network and Bayesian belief network. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26:1199-1210.