Rethinking integrated assessments and management projects in the Americas

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 26, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-5

  Garfin, Gregg ^a   Romero Lankao, Patricia ^a   Varady, Robert ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EDITORIAL; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY; WESTERN HEMISPHERE;

EID: 84871717410     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.010     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Agrawala S., Broad K., Guston D.H. Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision making: challenges to an emergent boundary organization. Science Technology Human Values 2001, 26:454-477.
2. Brasseur G., Jacobs K., Barron E., Benedick R., Chameides W., Dietz T., Romero Lankao P., McFarland M., Mooney H., Nathan D., Parson E., Richels R. Analysis of Global Change Assessments: Lessons Learned 2007, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
3. Buizer J., Jacobs K., Cash D. Making short-term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences 2010, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0900518107.
4. Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., Jäger, J., 2002. Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. KSG Working Papers Series RWP02-046. Retrieved 07.01.12 from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm%3Fabstract_id=372280.
5. Cash D.W. In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Science, Technology & Human Values 2001, 26:431-453.
6. Gerlak A., Varady R.G., Petit O., Haverland A. Hydrosolidarity and beyond: can ethics and equity find a place in today's water resource management?. Water International 2011, 36(3):251-265.
7. Guston D.H. Boundary organizations. Science Technology Human Values 2001, 26:399-408.
8. Hare M., Pahl-Wostl C. Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integrated Assessment 2002, 3:50-62.
9. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Core Writing Team 2007, IPCC, Geneva. R.K. Pachauri, A. Reisinger (Eds.).
10. Lemos M.C., Morehouse B.J. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change 2005, 15:57-68.
11. McKenzie Hedger M., Connell R., Bramwel P. Bridging the gap: empowering decision-making for adaptation through the UK Climate Impacts Programme. Climate Policy 2006, 6:201-215.
12. Moser S.C., Eckstrom J.A. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences 2010, http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1007887107.
13. Ostrom E., Ostrom V. The quest for meaning in public choice. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 2004, 63(1):105-147.
14. Pahl-Wostl C. A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:345-365.
15. Pahl-Wostl C., Möltgen J., Sendzimir J., Kabat P. New methods for adaptive water management under uncertainty - the NeWater project. Paper in the EWRA 2005 conference proceedings 2005, Menton, France, Retrieved 26.10.11 from: http://www.newater.info/index.php?pid=1020.
16. Parson E.A. Integrated assessment and environmental policy-making: in pursuit of usefulness. Energy Policy 1995, 23(4-5):463-475.
17. Pulwarty R.S., Nierenberg C., Simpson C. The regional integrated sciences and assessment, (RISA) program: crafting effective assessments for the long haul. Integrated Regional Assessment of Global Climate Change 2009, 367-393. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C.G. Knight, J. Jäger (Eds.).
18. Robinson J. Being undisciplined: transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures 2008, 40(1):70-86.
19. 2 and climate change. Environmental Conservation 1991, 18:313-322. 10.1017/S0376892900022566.
20. Rothman D.S., van Bers C., Bakkes J., Pahl-Wostl C. How to make global assessments more effective: lessons from the assessment community. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2009, 1(2):214-218.
21. Rotmans J. Tools for integrated sustainability assessment: atwo-track approach. Integrated Assessment Journal 2006, 6:35-57.
22. Sarewitz D., Pielke R.A. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science & Policy 2007, 10:5-16.
23. Timmerman J.G., Langaas S. Water information: what is it good for? The use of information in transboundary water management. Regional Environmental Change 2005, 5:177-187.
24. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) Global Environment Outlook 2000 1999, UNEP, Nairobi, Retrieved 31.10.11 from: http://www.grid.unep.ch/geo2000/.
25. vanKerkhoff L., Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006, 31:445-477.
26. Wilder M., Scott C.A., Pineda Pablos N., Varady R.G., Garfin G.M., McEvoy J. Adapting across boundaries: climate change, social learning, and resilience in the U.S-Mexico border region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2010, 100(4):917-928.