Grasses provide new insights into regulation of shoot branching

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 41-48

  Kebrom, Tesfamichael H ^a   Spielmeyer, Wolfgang ^a   Finnegan, E Jean ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GIBBERELLIC ACID; GIBBERELLIN; PHYTOHORMONE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; ENVIRONMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; POACEAE; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BIOMASS; ENVIRONMENT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GIBBERELLINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT SHOOTS; POACEAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

LILIOPSIDA; POACEAE;

EID: 84871713490     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.07.001     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Rawson, H.M. (ed.) (1967) Competition Within the Wheat Plant and the Plasticity of Response. PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide.
2. Fischer R.A. Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and the effect of shading. Crop Sci. 1975, 15:607-613.
3. Jones H.G., Kirby E.J.M. Effects of manipulation of number of tillers and water supply on grain yield in barley. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 1977, 88:391-397.
4. Xing Y., Zhang Q. Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:421-442.
5. Doebley J.F., et al. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127:1309-1321.
6. Doust A.N., Kellogg E.A. Effect of genotype and environment on branching in weedy green millet (Setaria viridis) and domesticated foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Poaceae). Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15:1335-1349.
7. Donald C.M. A barley breeding program based on a ideotype. J. Agric. Sci. 1979, 93:261-269.
8. Islam T.N.T., Sedgley R.H. Evidence for a 'uniculm effect' in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 1981, 30:277-282.
9. Wang L., Li J. Branching in rice. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:94-99.
10. Beveridge C.A., Kyozuka J. New genes in the strigolactone-related shoot branching pathway. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 3:34-39.
11. Doebley J., et al. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 1997, 386:485-488.
12. Kebrom T.H., et al. Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:1109-1117.
13. Dabbert T., et al. The genetics of barley low-tillering mutants: low number of tillers-1 (lnt1). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:705-715.
14. Whipple C.J., et al. grassy tillers1 promotes apical dominance in maize and responds to shade signals in the grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:E506-E512.
15. Ramsay L., et al. INTERMEDIUM-C, a modifier of lateral spikelet fertility in barley, is an ortholog of the maize domestication gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:169-173.
16. Kebrom T.H., et al. Inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth in the tin mutant of wheat is associated with precocious internode development. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:308-318.
17. Doust A.N. Grass architecture: genetic and environmental control of branching. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:21-25.
18. Li X., et al. Control of tillering in rice. Nature 2003, 422:618-621.
19. Schmitz G., et al. The tomato Blind gene encodes a MYB transcription factor that controls the formation of lateral meristems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:1064-1069.
20. Atsmon D., Jacobs E. Newly bred gigas form of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L) - morphological features and thermo-photoperiodic responses. Crop Sci. 1977, 17:31-35.
21. Jiao Y.Q., et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:541-544.
22. Miura K., et al. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42:545-549.
23. Beveridge C.A., et al. Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanisms?. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:812-819.
24. Beveridge C.A., et al. Pea has its tendrils in branching discoveries spanning a century from auxin to strigolactones. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:985-990.
25. Domagalska M.A., Leyser O. Signal integration in the control of shoot branching. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:211-221.
26. Muller D., Leyser O. Auxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107:1203-1212.
27. Thimann K.V., Skoog F. Studies on the growth hormone of plants III The inhibiting action of the growth substance on bud development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1933, 19:714-716.
28. Morris S.E., et al. Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiol. 2005, 138:1665-1672.
29. Ferguson B., Beveridge C.A. Roles for auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in regulating shoot branching. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149:1929-1944.
30. Sachs T. The control of patterned differentiation of vascular tissues. Adv. Bot. Res. 1981, 9:151-162.
31. Prusinkiewicz P., et al. Control of bud activation by an auxin transport switch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:17431-17436.
32. Wickson M., Thimann K.V. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiol. Plant. 1958, 11:62-74.
33. Gocal G.F.W., et al. Changes after decapitation in concentrations of indole-3-acetic-acid and abscisic-acid in the larger axillary bud of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv Tender Green. Plant Physiol. 1991, 95:344-350.
34. Leopold A.C. The control of tillering in grasses by auxin. Am. J. Bot. 1949, 36:437-440.
35. Isbell V.R., Morgan P.W. Manipulation of apical dominance in sorghum with growth-regulators. Crop Sci. 1982, 22:30-35.
36. Arite T., et al. DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. Plant J. 2007, 51:1019-1029.
37. Beveridge C.A., et al. Auxin inhibition of decapitation-induced branching is dependent on graft-transmissible signals regulated by genes Rms1 and Rms2. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123:689-697.
38. Beveridge C.A., et al. The rms1 mutant of pea has elevated indole-3-acetic acid levels and reduced root-sap zeatin riboside content but increased branching controlled by graft-transmissible signal(s). Plant Physiol. 1997, 115:1251-1258.
39. Napoli C. Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dad1-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111:27-37.
40. Sorefan K., et al. MAX4 and RMS1 are orthologous dioxygenase-like genes that regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis and pea. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:1469-1474.
41. Stirnberg P., et al. MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 2002, 129:1131-1141.
42. Booker J., et al. MAX3/CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:1232-1238.
43. Booker J., et al. MAX1 encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived branch-inhibiting hormone. Dev. Cell 2005, 8:443-449.
44. Ishikawa S., et al. Suppression of tiller bud activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:79-86.
45. Zou J.H., et al. The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. Plant J. 2006, 48:687-696.
46. Gomez-Roldan V., et al. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 2008, 455:189-194.
47. Umehara M., et al. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 2008, 455:195-200.
48. Cook C.E., et al. Germination stimulants 2. The structure of strigol - a potent seed germination stimulant for witchweed (Striga lutea Tour.). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94:6198-6199.
49. Aikyama K., et al. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature 2005, 435:824-827.
50. Lin H., et al. DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1512-1525.
51. Arite T., et al. d14, a strigolactone-insensitive mutant of rice, shows an accelerated outgrowth of tillers. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50:1416-1424.
52. Gao Z., et al. Dwarf 88, a novel putative esterase gene affecting architecture of rice plant. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 71:265-271.
53. Liu W., et al. Identification and characterization of HTD2: a novel gene negatively regulating tiller bud outgrowth in rice. Planta 2009, 230:649-658.
54. Brewer P.B., et al. Strigolactone acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth in pea and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150:482-493.
55. Hayward A., et al. Interactions between auxin and strigolactone in shoot branching control. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151:400-412.
56. Crawford S., et al. Strigolactones enhance competition between shoot branches by dampening auxin transport. Development 2010, 137:2905-2913.
57. Bennett T., et al. The Arabidopsis MAX pathway controls shoot branching by regulating auxin transport. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:553-563.
58. Martin-Trillo M., Cubas P. TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:31-39.
59. Takada T., et al. The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J. 2003, 33:513-520.
60. Aguilar-Martinez J.A., et al. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 2007, 19:458-472.
61. Martin-Trillo M., et al. Role of tomato BRANCHED1-like genes in the control of shoot branching. Plant J. 2011, 67:701-714.
62. Braun N., et al. The pea TCP transcription factor PsBRC1 acts downstream of strigolactones to control shoot branching. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:225-238.
63. Clark R.M., et al. A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb0005 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:594-597.
64. Studer A., et al. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:1160-1163.
65. Lukens L.N., Doebley J. Epistatic and environmental interactions for quantitative trait loci involved in maize evolution. Genet. Res. 1999, 74:291-302.
66. Smith H. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu. Rev. Plant Phys. 1995, 46:289-315.
67. Ballare C.L., et al. Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves - an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 1990, 247:329-332.
68. Finlayson S.A., et al. Phytochrome regulation of branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:1914-1927.
69. Su H., et al. Photosynthetic photon flux density and phytochrome B interact to regulate branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:1986-1998.
70. Minakuchi K., et al. FINE CLUM1(FC1) works downstream of strigolactones to inhibit the outgrowth of axillary buds in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51:1127-1135.
71. Dun E.A., et al. Antagonistic action of strigolactone and cytokinin in bud outgrowth control. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:487-498.
72. Kebrom T.H., et al. Suppression of sorghum axillary bud outgrowth by shade, phyB and defoliation signalling pathways. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33:48-58.
73. Xie K.B., et al. Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA promoter-binding-like transcription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:280-293.
74. Rhoades M.W., et al. Prediction of plant microRNA targets. Cell 2002, 110:513-520.
75. Chuck G., et al. The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39:544-549.
76. Schwarz S., et al. The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67:183-195.
77. Chuck G.S., et al. Overexpression of the maize Corngrass1 microRNA prevents flowering, improves digestibility, and increases starch content of switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:17550-17555.
78. Poethig R.S. Small RNAs and developmental timing in plants. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2009, 19:374-378.
79. Fu C., et al. Overexpression of miRNA156 in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) results in various morphological alterations and leads to improved biomass production. Plant Biotechol. J. 2012, 10:443-452.
80. Sakamoto T., et al. Expression of a gibberellin 2-oxidase gene around the shoot apex is related to phase transition in rice. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125:1508-1516.
81. Bolduc N., Hake S. The maize transcription factor KNOTTED1 directly regulates the gibberellin catabolism gene ga2ox1. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1647-1658.
82. Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:225-251.
83. Lo S.F., et al. A novel class of gibberellin 2-oxidases control semidwarfism, tillering, and root development in rice. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2603-2618.
84. O'Neill D.P., Ross J.J. Auxin regulation of the gibberellin pathway in pea. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130:1974-1982.
85. Mauriat M., et al. Proper gibberellin localization in vascular tissue is required to control auxin-dependent leaf development and bud outgrowth in hybrid aspen. Plant J. 2011, 67:805-816.
86. Kurapathy V., et al. Identification and mapping of a tiller inhibition gene (tin3) in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114:285-294.
87. Richards R.A. A tiller inhibitor gene in wheat and its effect on plant-growth. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1988, 39:749-757.
88. McMaster G.S. Phenology, development, and growth of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L) shoot apex: a review. Adv. Agron. 1997, 59:63-118.
89. Babb S., Muehlbauer G.J. Genetic and morphological characterization of the barley uniculm2 (cul2) mutant. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106:846-857.
90. Dabbert T., et al. The genetics of barley low-tillering mutants: absent lower laterals (als). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118:1351-1360.
91. Hay A., Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137:3153-3165.
92. Duggan B.L., et al. Agronomic evaluation of a tiller inhibition gene (tin) in wheat I. Effect on yield, yield components, and grain protein. Aust. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 56:169-178.
93. Mitchell J.H., et al. Evaluation of a reduced-tillering (tin) gene in wheat lines grown across different production environments. Crop Pasture Sci. 2012, 63:148-161.
94. Beveridge C.A., et al. Branching in pea (actions of genes Rms3 and Rms4). Plant Physiol. 1996, 110:859-865.
95. Ishikawa S., et al. Suppression of tiller activity in tillering dwarf mutants of rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:79-85.
96. Howarth D.G., Donoghue M.J. Phylogenetic analysis of the "ECE" (CYC_TB1) clade reveals duplications predating the core eudicots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:9101-9106.
97. Finlayson S.A. Arabidopsis Teosinte Branched1-like regulates axillary bud outgrowth and is homologous to monocot Teosinte Branched 1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48:667-677.