Adoption, acceptability, and accuracy of an online clinical trial matching website for breast cancer

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Cohen, Ellyn ^a   Belkora, Jeff ^a   Tyler, Joanne ^b   Schreiner, Joan ^b   Deering, Mary Jo ^c   Grama, Lakshmi ^c   Duggan, Brenda ^c   Illi, Julie ^a   Pederson, Julia ^a   Anand, Aprajita ^a   Teng, Alexandra ^a   McCreary, Erin ^a   Moore, Dan ^d   Tripathy, Debu ^a   Hogarth, Michael ^e   Lieberman, Morton ^a   Park, John ^a   Esserman, Laura ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b National Cancer Institute ^*

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Cancer information; Clinical trials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84871694777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1855     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-1241 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152] [Medline: 12393820]]
2. Friedman MA, Cain DF. National Cancer Institute sponsored cooperative clinical trials. Cancer 1990 May 15;65(10 Suppl):2376-2382. [Medline: 2334876]]
3. Mills EJ, Seely D, Rachlis B, Griffith L, Wu P, Wilson K, et al. Barriers to participation in clinical trials of cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review of patient-reported factors. Lancet Oncol 2006 Feb;7(2):141-148. [doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70576-9] [Medline: 16455478]]
4. Sung NS, Crowley WF, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood LM, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-1287. [Medline: 12633190]]
5. Comis RL, Miller JD, Colaizzi DD, Kimmel LG. Physician-related factors involved in patient decisions to enroll onto cancer clinical trials. J Oncol Pract 2009 Mar;5(2):50-56. [doi: 10.1200/JOP.0922001] [Medline: 20856718]]
6. Lara PN, Higdon R, Lim N, Kwan K, Tanaka M, Lau DH, et al. Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. J Clin Oncol 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1728-1733. [Medline: 11251003]]
7. Fink E, Kokku PK, Nikiforou S, Hall LO, Goldgof DB, Krischer JP. Selection of patients for clinical trials: an interactive web-based system. Artif Intell Med 2004 Jul;31(3):241-254. [doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.01.017] [Medline: 15302090]]
8. Ash N, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Ohno-Machado L. Finding appropriate clinical trials: evaluating encoded eligibility criteria with incomplete data. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:27-31. [Medline: 11825151]]
9. Ohno-Machado L, Wang SJ, Mar P, Boxwala AA. Decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in breast cancer. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:340-344. [Medline: 10566377]]
10. Breitfeld PP, Weisburd M, Overhage JM, Sledge G, Tierney WM. Pilot study of a point-of-use decision support tool for cancer clinical trials eligibility. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6(6):466-477 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 10579605]]
11. Breitfeld PP, Ullrich F, Anderson J, Crist WM. Web-based decision support for clinical trial eligibility determination in an international clinical trials network. Control Clin Trials 2003 Dec;24(6):702-710. [Medline: 14662275]]
12. Fox S. Online health search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2006 Oct 29. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/-/media// Files/Reports/2006/PIP-Online-Health-2006.pdf.pdf [accessed 2012-06-07] [WebCite Cache ID 5xnSUoYXn]]
13. Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Massett HA, Leonard CR, Grama L, Manrow R. Using the Internet to search for cancer clinical trials: a comparative audit of clinical trial search tools. Contemp Clin Trials 2008 Jul;29(4):555-564. [doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.01.007] [Medline: 18346942]]
14. US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials.gov URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ [accessed 2011-10-25] [WebCite Cache ID 62hbO18Y1]]
15. National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health. Clinical Trials Search URL: http://www.cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search [accessed 2011-10-25] [WebCite Cache ID 62hbldK1V]]
16. Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups. CancerTrialsHelp.org URL: http://www.cancertrialshelp.org/ [accessed 2011-10-25] [WebCite Cache ID 62hbpO58B]]
17. EmergingMed. 2011. Find Cancer Clinical Trial Options URL: http://www.emergingmed.com/ [accessed 2011-10-25] [WebCite Cache ID 62hbrXYXt]]
18. Metz JM, Coyle C, Hudson C, Hampshire M. An Internet-based cancer clinical trials matching resource. J Med Internet Res 2005 Jul 1;7(3):e24 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.3.e24] [Medline: 15998615]]
19. Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann 1982;5(3):233-237. [Medline: 10259963]]
20. Atkinson NL, Massett HA, Mylks C, Hanna B, Deering MJ, Hesse BW. User-centered research on breast cancer patient needs and preferences of an Internet-based clinical trial matching system. J Med Internet Res 2007;9(2):e13 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e13] [Medline: 17513284]]
21. Atkinson NL, Massett HA, Mylks C, McCormack LA, Kish-Doto J, Hesse BW, et al. Assessing the impact of user-centered research on a clinical trial eHealth tool via counterbalanced research design. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18(1):24-31 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006122] [Medline: 21169619]]
22. Liu Y, Diamant AL, Thind A, Maly RC. Validity of self-reports of breast cancer treatment in low-income, medically underserved women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010 Feb;119(3):745-751. [doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0447- 5] [Medline: 19551500]]
23. Phillips KA, Milne RL, Buys S, Friedlander ML, Ward JH, McCredie MR, et al. Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry. J Clin Oncol 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4679-4686. [doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.002] [Medline: 15851764]]
24. Ganz PA, Hahn EE. Implementing a survivorship care plan for patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008 Feb 10;26(5):759-767. [doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2851] [Medline: 18258984]]
25. Kim EH, Stolyar A, Lober WB, Herbaugh AL, Shinstrom SE, Zierler BK, et al. Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(4):e44 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1256] [Medline: 19861298]]
26. BreastCancerTrials.org. 2011. Find a Trial That's Right for You URL: https://www.breastcancertrials.org/bct-nation/;jsessionid= D697799A8A8826908706519BB41F3772 [accessed 2011-10-25] [WebCite Cache ID 62hbu9tRz]]
27. Cohen EJ, Belkora JK, McCreary E, Colen S, Maple T, Bechtold T, et al. BreastCancerTrials.org: Early evaluation of a nationwide clinical trial matching service. MA: org: early evaluation of a nationwide clinical trial matching service. conf-loc:; 2010 Presented at: Thirty-Third Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; Dec 8-12, 2010; San Antonio, TX, USA URL: http://www.posters2view.com/sabcs10/viewp.php?nu=P5-07-01 [WebCite Cache]]