Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: A laboratory study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 505-512

  Leutert, Christian R ^a   Stawarczyk, Bogna ^a   Truninger, Thomas C ^a   Hämmerle, Christoph H F ^a   Sailer, Irena ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bending moments; Horizontal mismatch; Implant abutments; Implant abutment connection; Titanium abutments; Zirconia abutments

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84871682040     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Degidi M, Artese L, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Gehrke P, Piattelli A. Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, nitric oxide synthase expression, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and proliferative activity in peri-implant soft tissues around titanium and zirconium oxide healing caps. J Periodontol 2006;77:73-80.
2. Warashina H, Sakano S, Kitamura S, et al. Biological reaction to alumina, zirconia, titanium and polyethylene particles implanted onto murine calvaria. Biomaterials 2003;24:3655-3661.
3. Jung RE, Sailer I, Hammerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:251-257.
4. Quinn JB, Quinn GD. A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials. Dent Mater 2010;26:135-147.
5. Scherrer SS, Kelly JR, Quinn GD, Xu K. Fracture toughness (KIc) of a dental porcelain determined by fractographic analysis. Dent Mater 1999;15:342-348.
6. Lüthi H. Strength and toughness of dental ceramics. In: Mörmann WH (ed). CAD/CAM in Esthetic Dentistry: Cerec 10-Year Aniversary Symposium. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:229-240.
7. Rieger W. Medical applications of ceramics. In: Kostorz G (ed). High-Tech Ceramics: Viewpoints and Perspectives. London: Academic Press, 1989:1291-1328.
8. Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, Edelhoff D. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:325-331.
9. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285-290.
10. Andersson B, Taylor A, Lang BR, et al. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 1-to 3-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:432-438.
11. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:604-610.
12. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-298.
13. Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent 1993;21:203-208.
14. Mollersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:582-591.
15. Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T, Strub JR. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:380-386.
16. Att W, Kurun S, Gerds T, Strub JR. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:111-116.
17. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:850-858.
18. ISO. Draft Norm 14801. Dentistry: Fatigue Test for Endosseous Dental Implants. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
19. Burstein AH, Wright TM. Fundamentals of Orthopedic Biomechanics. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
20. Lentner C. Geigy Scientific Tables. Basel: Ciba-Geigy Limited, 1980.
21. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:18-22.
22. Haraldson T, Carlsson GE, Ingervall B. Functional state, bite force and postural muscle activity in patients with osseointegrated oral implant bridges. Acta Odontol Scand 1979;37:195-206.
23. Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hammerle CH. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:802-808.