Stomatal behaviour of irrigated Vitis vinifera cv. Syrah following partial root removal

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 39, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1019-1027

  Zufferey, V ^a   Smart, D R ^b  

^a AGROSCOPE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

gas exchanges; grapevine; leaf specific hydraulic conductance; leaf water potential; root pruning; stomatal conductance.

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; GAS EXCHANGE; GROWING SEASON; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; PLANT WATER RELATIONS; PRUNING; ROOT SYSTEM; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; SYMPTOM; VINE; WATER AVAILABILITY; WILTING;

VITACEAE; VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 84871652067     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP12091     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Addington RN, Mitchell RJ, Oren R, DonovanLA(2004) Stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit and its relationship to hydraulic conductance in Pinus palustris. Tree Physiology 24, 561-569. doi:10.1093/treephys/24.5.561 (Pubitemid 39538728)
2. AlsinaMM,SmartDR,Bauerle T, de Herralde F, Biel C, StockertCM,Negron C, SaveR(2011) Seasonal changes of whole root system conductance by a drought tolerant grape root system. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 99-109. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq247
3. Améglio T, Archer P, Cohen M, Valancogne C, Daudet F, Dayau S, Cruiziat P (1999) Significance and limits in the use of predawn leaf water potential for tree irrigation. Plant and Soil 207, 155-167. doi:10.1023/A: 1026415302759 (Pubitemid 29273033)
4. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In 'Progress in photosynthesis research'. (Ed. J Biggins) pp. 221-234. (Martinus Nijhoff: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
5. Bauerle TL, Richards JH, Smart DR, Eissenstat DM (2008) Importance of internal hydraulic redistribution for prolonging the lifespan of roots in dry soil. Plant, Cell & Environment 31, 177-186.
6. Breda N, Granier A, Barataud F, Moyne C (1995) Soil water dynamics in an oak stand. I. Soil moisture, water potentials and water uptake by roots. Plant and Soil 172, 17-27. (Pubitemid 26436237)
7. Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM (2003) Stomatal closure during leaf dehydratation, correlation with other leaf physiological traits. Plant Physiology 132, 2166-2173. doi:10.1104/pp.103.023879 (Pubitemid 37024176)
8. Burgess SSO, Bleby TM (2006) Redistribution of soil water to lateral roots mediated by stem tissues. Journal of Experimental Botany 57, 3283-3291. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl085 (Pubitemid 44453538)
9. ChavesMM,Tenhunen JD, Harley P, LangeOL(1987) Gas exchange studies in two Portuguese grapevine cultivars. Physiologia Plantarum 70, 639-647. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb04318.x
10. Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Fransisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, LopesCM(2010) Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Annals of Botany 105, 661-676. doi:10.1093/aob/mcq030
11. Choat B, Drayton WM,Brodersen CR, Matthews MA, Shackel KA, Wada H, McElrone AJ (2010) Measurement of vulnerability to water stressinduced cavitation in grapevine: a comparison of four techniques applied to long-vesseled species. Plant, Cell & Environment 33, 1502-1512.
12. Cochard H, Coll L, Le Roux X, Ameglio T (2002) Unraveling the effects of plant hydraulics on stomatal closure during water stress in walnut. Plant Physiology 128, 282-290. doi:10.1104/pp.010400 (Pubitemid 34115329)
13. Comstock JP (2000) Variation in hydraulic architecture and gas exchange in two desert sub-shrubs, Hymenoclea salsola (T. &G.) and Ambrosia dumosa. Oecologia 125, 1-10. doi:10.1007/PL00008879
14. Correia MJ, Pereira JS, Chaves MM, Rodrigues ML, Pacheco CA (1995) ABA xylem concentrations determine maximum daily leaf conductance of field-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 511-521. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00551.x
15. Davies WJ, Zhang J (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42, 55-76. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.42. 060191.000415 (Pubitemid 21903925)
16. Davies WJ, Tardieu F, Trejo CL (1994) How do chemical signals work in plants that grow in drying soil? Plant Physiology 104, 309-314.
17. Donovan LA, Richards JH, Linton MJ (2003) Magnitude and mechanisms of predawn disequilibrium between predawn and plant soil water potentials in desert shrubs. Ecology 84, 463-470. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084 [0463:MAMODB]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 36893083)
18. Ewers BE, Oren R, Sperry JS (2000) Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant, Cell & Environment 23, 1055-1066. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00625.x
19. Franks PJ (2004) Stomatal control and hydraulic conductance, with special reference to tall trees. Tree Physiology 24, 865-878. doi:10.1093/treephys/24. 8.865 (Pubitemid 39533665)
20. Fuchs EE, Livingston NJ (1996) Hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga mensiesii (Mirb) Franco) and alder (Alnus rubra (Bong)) seedlings. Plant, Cell & Environment 19, 1091-1098. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00216.x (Pubitemid 27099308)
21. Harley PC, Baldocchi DD (1995) Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. I. Leaf model parametrization. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 1146-1156. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00625.x
22. Holbrook NM, Shashidhar VR, James RA, Munns R (2002) Stomatal control in tomato with ABA-deficient roots: response of grafted plants to soil drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1503-1514. doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.373.1503 (Pubitemid 34589565)
23. Hubbard RM, Bond BJ, Ryan MG (1999) Evidence that hydraulic conductance limits photosynthesis in old Pinus ponderosa trees. Tree Physiology 19, 165-172. doi:10.1093/treephys/19.3.165 (Pubitemid 29163298)
24. Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller V, Sperry JS (2001) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary lineary with plant hydraulic conductance in Ponderosa pine. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 113-121. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00660.x (Pubitemid 32122643)
25. Jarvis AJ, Davies WJ (1998) Modeling stomatal responses to soil and atmospheric drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 49(Special Issue), 399-406. doi:10.1093/jxb/49.Special-Issue.399
26. Jones HG (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. Journal of Experimental Botany 49(Special Issue), 387-398. (Pubitemid 28147122)
27. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) 'Water relations of plants and soils.' (Academic Press: San Diego, CA)
28. Leuning R (1990) Modeling stomatal behaviour and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 159-175. doi:10.1071/PP9900159
29. Loveys BR (1991) How useful is a knowledge of ABA physiology for crop improvement? In 'Abscisic acid physiology and biochemistry'. (Eds WJ Davies, HG Jones) pp. 245-260. (Bios Scientific Publishers: Oxford)
30. Lovisolo C, SchubertA(1998) Effects of water stress on vessel size and xylem hydraulic conductivity in Vitis vinifera L. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 693-700. (Pubitemid 28203038)
31. Lovisolo C, Hartung W, Schubert A (2002) Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by stress in grapevines. Functional Plant Biology 29, 1349-1356. doi:10.1071/FP02079 (Pubitemid 35431567)
32. Meinzer FC (2002) Co-ordination of vapor and liquid phase water transport proprieties in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 265-274. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00781.x (Pubitemid 34179271)
33. Meinzer FC, Grantz DA (1990) Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity. Plant, Cell & Environment 13, 383-388. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040. 1990.tb02142.x
34. Monteith JL (1995) A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 18, 357-364. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00371. x
35. Morison JI (1987) Intercellular CO2 concentration and stomatal response to CO2. In 'Stomatal function'. (Eds E Zeiger, GD Farquhar, IR Cowan) pp. 229-251. (Stanford University Press: Stanford)
36. Mott KA (1988) Do stomata respond to CO2 concentrations other than intercellular? Plant Physiology 86, 200-203. doi:10.1104/pp.86.1.200
37. Mott KA, Buckley TN (1998) Stomatal heterogeneity. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 407-417. (Pubitemid 28147124)
38. Mott KA, Franks PJ (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturbation in humidity. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 657-662. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00705.x (Pubitemid 32526139)
39. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF (1991) Stomata response to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell & Environment 14, 509-515. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991. tb01521.x
40. Nardini A, Tyree MT, Salleo S (2001) Xylem cavitation in the leaf of Prunus laurocerasus and its impact on leaf hydraulics. Plant Physiology 125, 1700-1709. doi:10.1104/pp.125.4.1700 (Pubitemid 32375754)
41. Oren R, Sperry JS, Ewers BE, Pataki DE, Phillips N, Megonigal JP (2001) Sensitivity of mean canopy stomatal conductance to vapor pressure deficit in a flooded Taxadium distichum L. forest: hydraulic and non-hydraulic effects. Oecologia 126, 21-29. doi:10.1007/s004420000497 (Pubitemid 32442508)
42. Saliendra NZ, Sperry JS, Comstock JP (1995) Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196, 357-366. doi:10.1007/BF00201396
43. Salleo S, Nardini A, Pitt F, LoGulloM(2000) Xylem cavitation and hydraulic control of stomatal conductance in Laurel (Laurus nobilis L.). Plant, Cell & Environment 23, 71-79. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00516.x (Pubitemid 30104998)
44. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148, 339-346. doi:10.1126/science.148.3668. 339
45. Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1393-1405. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01064.x (Pubitemid 36996686)
46. Schultz HR, Matthews MA (1997) High vapour pressure deficit exacerbates xylem cavitation and photoinhibition in shade-grown Piper auritum H.B. & K. during prolonged sunflecks. I. Dynamics of plant water relations. Oecologia 110, 312-319. doi:10.1007/s004420050164 (Pubitemid 27191296)
47. Shackel KA, Brinckmann E (1985) In situ measurement of epidermal cell turgor, leaf water potential, and gas exchange in Tradescantia virginia L. Plant Physiology 78, 66-70. doi:10.1104/pp.78.1.66
48. Smart RE, Combe B (1983) Water relations of grapevines. In 'Additional woody crop plants. Water deficit and plant growth. Vol. VII'. (Ed. TT Kozlowski) pp. 138-196. (Academic Press: New York)
49. Smart DR, Carlisle E, AlonsoB(2005) Transverse hydraulic redistribution by a grapevine. Plant, Cell&Environment 28, 157-166. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 3040.2004.01254.x (Pubitemid 40199508)
50. Smart DR, Breazeale A, Zufferey V (2006) Physiological changes in plant hydraulics induced by partial root removal of irrigated grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Syrah). American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 57, 201-209. (Pubitemid 43974654)
51. Sperry JS, Pockman WT (1993) Limitation of transpiration by hydraulic conductance and xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant, Cell & Environment 16, 279-287. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00870.x
52. Sperry JS, Alder NN, Easlack SE (1993) The effect of reduced hydraulic conductance on stomatal conductance and xylem cavitation. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 1075-1082. doi:10.1093/jxb/44.6.1075
53. Sperry JS, Hacke UG, Oren R, Comstock JP (2002) Water deficit and hydraulic limits to leaf water supply. Plant, Cell & Environment 25, 251-263. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00799.x (Pubitemid 34179270)
54. Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P (2000) Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1627-1634. doi:10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1627
55. Tardieu F, Davies WJ (1993) Integration of hydraulic and chemical signaling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 16, 341-349. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 3040.1993.tb00880.x
56. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modeling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 419-432. (Pubitemid 28147125)
57. Tardieu F, Lafarge T, Simonneau T (1996) Stomatal control by fed or endogenous xylem ABA in sunflower: interpretation of observed correlations between leaf water potential and stomatal conductance in anisohydric species. Plant, Cell & Environment 19, 75-84. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00228.x
58. Teskey RO, Hincley TM, Grier CC (1983) Effect of interruption of flow path on stomatal conductance of Abies amabilis. Journal of Experimental Botany 34, 1251-1259. doi:10.1093/jxb/34.10.1251
59. Turner NC (1988) Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrigation Science 9, 289-308. doi:10.1007/BF00296704
60. Tyree MT, Sperry JS (1988) Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Answer from a model. Plant Physiology 88, 574-580. doi:10.1104/pp.88.3.574
61. Tyree MT, Valez V, Dalling JW (1998) Growth dynamics of root and shoot hydraulic conductance in seedling of five neotropical tree species: scaling to show possible adaptation to differing light regimes. Oecologia 114, 293-298. doi:10.1007/s004420050450 (Pubitemid 28209255)
62. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153, 376-387. doi:10.1007/BF00384257
63. WongSC,CowanIR, FarquharGD(1985) Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation. I. Influence of nitrogen nutrition, phosphorous nutrition, photon flux density and ambient partial pressure of CO2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiology 78, 821-825. doi:10.1104/pp.78. 4.821
64. Zufferey V, Cochard H, Ameglio T, Spring J-L, ViretO(2011) Diurnal cycles of embolism formation and repair in petioles of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas). Journal of Experimental Botany 62(11), 3885-3894. doi:10.1093/jxb/err081