Fusion of active and passive hydrologic and geophysical tomographic surveys: The future of subsurface characterization

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 171, Issue , 2007, Pages 109-120

  Yeh, Tian Chyi Jim ^a,b   Lee, Cheng Haw ^b   Hsu, Kuo Chin ^b   Tan, Yih Chi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871649293     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/171GM10     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Bear, J., (1972), Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Dover, NY.
2. Beckie, R., and C. F. Harvey (2002), What does a slug test mea- sure: An investigation of instrument response and the effects of heterogeneity, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1290, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR001072.
3. Bevan, M. J., A. L. Endresb, D. L. Rudolphb, G. Parkinc, (2005), A field scale study of pumping-induced drainage and recovery in an unconfined aquifer, Journal of Hydrology, 315, 52-70.
4. Bevan, M. J., A.L. Endres, D. L. Rudolph, G. Parkin (2003), The noninvasive characterization of pumping induced dewatering using ground penetrating radar. Journal of Hydrology, 281, 55-69.
5. Binley, A., P. Winship, R. Middleton, M. Pokar, J. West (2001), High-resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross-borehole radar, Water Resour. Res., 37(11), doi:10.1029/ 2000WR 000089.
6. Binley, A., S. Henry-Poulter, B. Shaw (1996), Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography, Water Resour. Res., 32(4), 763-770, 10.1029/95WR 02995.
7. Bohling, G. C., X. Zhan, J. J. Butler Jr., and L. Zheng (2002), Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for charac- terization of aquifer heterogeneities, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1324, doi:10.1029/2001WR001176.
8. Brauchler, R., R. Liedl, and P. Dietrich (2003), A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach, Water Resour. Res., 39(12), 1370, doi:10.1029/2003WR002262.
9. Bredehoeft, J. D., From models to performance assessment: the con- ceptualization problem (2003), Ground Water 41.5, p571(7).
10. Butler, J. J. Jr., (1997), The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests, Lewis Pub., 252 pp.
11. Cirpka, O. A., and P. K. Kitanidis (2001), Sensitivity of temporal moments calculated by the adjoint-state method and joint invers- ing of head and tracer data, Adv. Water Resour. 24(1), 89-103.
12. Cummins, K. L., E. P. Krider, and M. D. Malone (1998a), The U. S. National Lightning Detection Network and applications of cloud- to- ground lightning data by electric power utilities, IEEE Trans. on EMC, 40(4), 465-480, November.
13. Cummins, K. L., M. J. Murphy, E. A. Bardo, W. L.Hiscox, R. P. Pyle, and A. E. Pifer (1998b), A combined TOA/MDF technol- ogy upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 9035-9044.
14. Daily, W., A. Ramirez, D. LaBrecque and J. Nitao (1992), Electri- cal resistivity tomography of vadose water movement, Water Resour. Res., 28(5), 1429-1442.
15. Day-Lewis, F. D., and J. W. Lane, Jr., 2004, Assessing the Res- olution-Dependent Utility of Tomograms for Geostatistics, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, L07503, doi:10.1029/ 2004GL019617, 4p.
16. Day-Lewis, F. D., J. W. Lane, Jr., J. M. Harris, and S. M. Gorelick, (2003), Time-Lapse Imaging of Saline Tracer Tests Using Cross-Borehole Radar Tomography, Water Resources Research, Vol. 39, No. 10, 14 p., 1290, doi:10.1029/2002WR001722.
17. Day-Lewis, F. D., K. Singha, and A. M. Binley (2005), Apply- ing Petrophysical Models to Radar Traveltime and Electrical Resistivity Tomograms: Resolution-Dependent Limitations, J. of Geophysical Research, Vol. 110, B08206, doi:10.1029/ 2004JB005369, 17p.
18. Day-Lewis, F. D., J. W. Lane, Jr., and S. M. Gorelick, (2004), Combined Interpretation of Radar, Hydraulic and Tracer Data from a Fractured-Rock Aquifer, Hydrogeology Journal, doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0372-y, Vol. 14, No. 1-2, 1-14.
19. Desbarats, A. J., D. R. Boyle, M. Stapinsky, and M. J. L. Robin (1999), A dual-porosity model for water level response to atmo- spheric loading in wells tapping fractured rock aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 35(5), 1495-1506.
20. DeWiest, R. J. M., (1965), Geohydrology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
21. Domenico, P. A. and F. W. Schwartz (1990), Physical and chemical hydrogeology, Joh Wiley and Son, pp824.
22. Duffy, C. (1978), Recharge and groundwater conditions in the western region of the Roswell Basin, New Mexico WRRI. Rept. No-100.
23. Ellis, R. G., and S. W. Oldenburg (1994), The pole-pole 3-D dc resistivity inverse problem: a conjugate gradient approach, Geo- physical Journal International 119, 187-194.
24. Endres, A. L., W. P. Clement, D. L., Rudolph, D. L. (2000), Ground penetrating radar imaging of an aquifer during a pumping test. Ground Water, 38, 566-576.
25. Englert, A., J. Zhu, A. Kemna, J. Vanderborght, H. Vereecken, T.-C. J. Yeh (2005), Potential of electrical resistivity tomography characterizing transport processes in groundwater-synthetic case studies, AGU, H37.
26. Gottlieb, J., and P. Dietrich (1995), Identification of the perme- ability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography, Inverse Probl., 11, 353-360.
27. Harter, T. and T.-C. J. Yeh (1996) Conditional stochastic analysis of solute transport in heterogeneous, variably saturated soils, Water Resour. Res., 32 (6).
28. Harvey, C. F. and S. M. Gorelick (1995 b), Mapping hydraulic conductivity: sequential conditioning with measurements of solute arrival time, hydraulic head, and local conductivity, Water Resour. Res., 31(7), 1615-1626.
29. Harvey, C. F., and S. M. Gorelick (1995 a), Temporal moment- generating equations: Modeling transport and mass transfer in heterogeneous aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 31(8), 1895-1912, 10.1029/95WR01231.
30. Illman, W. A., X. Liu, and A. Craig (2006), Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic hetero- geneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms, submitted manuscript.
31. Kemna, A., J. Vanderborght, B. Kulessa and H. Vereecken (2002), Imaging and characterization of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models, J. of Hydrology 267, 125-146.
32. Kitanidis, P. K. (1995), Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for invers- ing, Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2411-2420.
33. Konikow, L., and J. D. Bredehoeft (1992), Groundwater models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources, 15, 75-83.
34. Krider, E. P. (1992), On the electromagnetic fields, Poynting vector, and peak power radiated by lightning return strokes, J. Geophys. Res., 97 (D14), 15, 913-917.
35. Krider, E. P., R. C. Noggle, A. E. Pifer, and D. L. Vance (1980), Lightning direction-finding systems for forest fire detection, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 61 (9), 980-986.
36. Krider, E. P., R. C. Noggle, and M. A. Uman (1976), A gated, wideband magnetic direction finder for lightning return strokes, J. Appl. Meteorol., 15 (3), 301-306.
37. Li W., W. Nowak, O. A. Cirpka (2005), Geostatistical inverse modeling of transient pumping tests using temporal moments of drawdown, Water Resour. Res., 41, W08403, doi:10.1029/ 2004WR003874.
38. Li, B., and T.-C. J. Yeh (1999), Cokriging estimation of the con- ductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions, Water Resour. Res., 35(12), 3663-3674.
39. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg (1994), Inversion of 3D dc-resistivity data using an approximate inverse mapping, Geophysical Jour- nal International 116, 527-537.
40. Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg (2000), Incorporating geological dip information into geophysical inversions, Geophysics, 65(1), 148-157.
41. Lin, Y. B., Y-C Tan, T-C J. Yeh, C-W Liu, C-H Chen, (2004), A viscoelastic model for groundwater level changes in the Cho-Shui River alluvial fan after the Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan, Water Resour. Res. 40 (4): W04213.
42. Liu, S., T. -C. J. Yeh, and R. Gardiner (2002), Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: sandbox experiments. Water Resour. Res.38(4): 10.1029/2001WR000338.
43. Liu, S.-Y, and T.-C.J. Yeh (2004), An integrative approach for monitoring water movement in the vadose zone, Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 3(2), p 681-692.
44. Liu, X., W. A. Illman, A. J. Craig, J. Zhu and T.-C. J. Yeh (2007), Multi-method and multiscale validation of transient hydraulic tomography, Water Resour. Res. to appear.
45. McDermott CI, M., Sauter, and R. Liedl (2003), New experimental techniques for pneumatic tomographical determination of the flow and transport parameters of highly fractured porous rock samples, Journal of Hydrology, 278 (1-4): 51-63.
46. McLaughin, D. and L. R. Townley (1996), A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 32(5), 1131-1161.
47. Moysey, S., Singha K., and Knight, R. (2005), Inferring field- scale rock physics relations through numerical simulation. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, L08304, doi:10.1029/ 2004GL022152.
48. National Research Council (NRC) (2000), Seeing into the earth:noninvasive characterization of the shallow subsurface for envi- ronmental and engineering application, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, Water Science and Technology Board, Commis- sion on Geosciencce, Environment, and Resources, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
49. Nevulis, R. H., D. R. Davis, and S. Sorooshian (1989), Analysis of Natural Ground-water Level Variations for Hydrogeologic Conceptualization, Hanford Site, Washington, Water Resour. Res., 25(7): 1519-1529.
50. Oldenburg, D. W. and Y. Li (1999), Estimating depth of inves- tigation in dc resistivity and Ip surveys, Geophysics, 64(2), 403-416.
51. Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz (1994), Verifica- tion, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263: 641-646.
52. Renshaw, C. E. (1996), Estimation of fracture zone geometry from steady-state hydraulic head data using iterative sequential cokriging, Geophysical Research Letters 23(19): 2685-2688 SEP 15.
53. Ritzi, R. W., S. Sorooshian, P. A. Hsieh (1991), The estimation of fluid flow properties from the response of water levels in wells to the combined atmospheric and Earth tide forces, Water Resour. Res., 27(5), 883-893, 10.1029/91WR00070.
54. Rizzo, E., B. Suski, and A. Revil (2004), Self-potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B10203, doi:10.1029/2004JB003049.
55. Rubin, Y. and S. Hubbard (2005), Hydrogeophysics, 523 p., Springer, The Netherlands.
56. Singha K., S. M. Gorelick (2005), Saline tracer visualized with three-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field- scale spatial moment analysis, Water Resour. Res., 41, W05023, doi:10.1029/2004WR003460.
57. Straface, S., T.-C. J. Yeh, J. Zhu, and S. Troisi (2006), Sequential Aquifer Tests at a Well Field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy, Water Resour. Res., in review.
58. Vasco, D. W, H. Keers, and K. Karasaki (2000), Estimation of reservoir properties using transient pressure data: An asymptotic approach, Water Resour. Res., 36 (12): 3447-3465.
59. Vereecken, H., A. Binley, G. Cassiani, (2006), Applied Hydrogeo- physics, ISBN: 1402049110, Springer, 396 pages.
60. Wu, C.-M., T.-C. J. Yeh, J. Zhu, T. H. Lee, N.-S. Hsu, C.-H. Chen, and A. F. Sancho (2005), Traditional analysis of aquifer tests:Comparing apples to oranges?, Water Resour. Res., 41, W09402, doi:10.1029/2004WR003717.
61. Xiang, J., and T.-C. J. Yeh, (2005), Numerical Simulation of River Stage Tomography Numerical Simulation of River Stage Tomog- raphy, H41E-0463, EOS Abstracts.
62. Yeh, T. -C. J. and J. Šimůnek (2002), Stochastic fusion of informa- tion for characterizing and monitoring the vadose zone, Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 1, p 207-221.
63. Yeh, T.-C. J., J. Zhu, A. Englert, A. Guzman, and S. Flaherty (2006), A Successive Linear Estimator for Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Hydrogeophysics, edited by H. Vereecken.
64. Yeh, T.-C. J., and S. Liu (2000), Hydraulic tomography: Develop- ment of a new aquifer test method, Water Resour. Res., 36(8), 2095-2105.
65. Yeh, T.-C. J., J. Zhang (1996), A geostatistical inverse method for variably saturated flow in the vadose zone, Water Resour. Res., 32(9), 2757-2766, 10.1029/96 WR01497.
66. Yeh, T.-C. J., S. Liu, R. J. Glass, K. Baker, J.R. Brainard, D. Alum- baugh, and D. LaBrecque (2002), A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1278, doi:10.1029/2001WR001204.
67. Yeh, T.-C. J. Hsu, K., Lee, C., J. Wen, C, Ting (2004). On the Possibility of Using River Stage Tomography to Characterize the Aquifer Properties of the Choshuishi Alluvial Fan, Taiwan, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AGUFM.H11D0329Y.
68. Zhang, J., R. L. Mackie, and T. Madden (1995), 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients. Geophysics, 60, 1313-1325.
69. Zhu, J., and T.-C. J. Yeh (2005), Characterization of aquifer het- erogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography, Water Resour. Res., 41, W07028, doi:10.1029/2004WR003790.
70. Zhu, J., and T-C J. Yeh (2006), Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown-recovery data, Water Resour. Res., 42, W02403, doi:10.1029/2005WR004309.