Evaluating time points for measuring recovery after major trauma in adults

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 257, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 166-172

  Gabbe, Belinda J ^a,b   Simpson, Pam M ^a   Sutherland, Ann M ^a,b   Wolfe, Rory ^a   Lyons, Ronan A ^c   Cameron, Peter A ^a,b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disability; functional outcome; multiple trauma; quality of life; recovery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETURN TO WORK; TIME FACTORS; VICTORIA; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871613243     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825d7422     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Flint L, Meredith J, Schwab W, et al., eds. Trauma: Contemporary Principles and Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2008.
2. Gabbe B, Simpson P, Sutherland A, et al. Improved functional outcomes for major trauma patients in a regionalised, inclusive trauma system. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1009-1015.
3. Gabbe B, Williamson O, Cameron P, et al. Choosing outcome assessment instruments fortraumaregistries. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:751-758. (Pubitemid 41021887)
4. Bouillon B, Kreder H, Eypasch E, et al. MI Consensus Group. Quality oflife in patients withmultiple injuries-basic issues, assessment, andrecommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2002;20:125-134.
5. Van Beeck E, Larsen C, Lyons R, et al. Guidelinesfortheconductionoffollow-up studies measuring injury-related disability. JTrauma. 2007;62:534-550.
6. Baldry Currens J, Coats T. The timing of disability measurements following injury. Injury. 2000;31:93-98. (Pubitemid 30069721)
7. Fitzharris M, Fildes B, Charlton J, et al. General health status and functional disability following injury in traffic crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007;8:309-320.
8. Hebert J, Burnham R. The effect of polytrauma in persons with traumatic spine injury. A prospective database of spine fractures. Spine. 2000;25:55-60. (Pubitemid 30035983)
9. Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, et al. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1999;46:765-771.
10. Kopjar B. The SF-36 health survey: a valid measure of changes in health status after injury. Inj Prev. 1996;2:135-139.
11. Mac Kenzie E, Bosse M, Kellam J, et al. Early predictors oflong-term work disability after major limb trauma. J Trauma. 2006;61:688-694. (Pubitemid 44400956)
12. Meerding W, Looman C, Essink-Bot M, et al. Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma. 2004;56:150-161. (Pubitemid 38182178)
13. Michaels AJ, Michaels CE, Smith JS, et al. Outcome from injury: gen-eral health, work status, and satisfaction 12 months after trauma. J Trauma. 2000;48:841-850. (Pubitemid 30435950)
14. Polinder S, van Beeck E, Essink-Bot M, et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and24months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma. 2007;62:133-141. (Pubitemid 46102844)
15. Toien K, Bredal I, Skogstad L, et al. Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:22.
16. van der Sluis C, ten Duis H, Geertzen J. Multiple injuries: an overview of the outcome. J Trauma. 1995;38:681-686.
17. Watson W, Ozanne-Smith J, Richardson J. An evaluation of the assessment of quality of life utility instrument as a measure of the impact of injury on health-related quality of life. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2005;12:227-239.
18. Cameron P, Finch C, Gabbe B, et al. Developing Australia's first statewide trauma registry: what are the lessons? ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:424-428. (Pubitemid 38887831)
19. Cameron P, Gabbe B, Mc Neil J, et al. The trauma registry as a state-wide quality improvement tool. J Trauma. 2005;59:1469-1476.
20. Gabbe B, Sutherland A, Hart M, et al. Population-based capture oflong-term functional and quality oflife outcomes after major trauma: the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry. J Trauma. 2010;69:532-536.
21. Wilson J, Pettigrew L, Teasdale G. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573-585.
22. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. 3rd ed. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorpo-rated; 1998.
23. Williamson O, Gabbe B, Cameron P, et al. Predictors ofpersistent moderate or severe pain following orthopaedic injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:139-144.
24. Gabbe B, Simpson P, Sutherland A, et al. Functional and health-related quality oflife outcomes followingpaediatric trauma. J Trauma. 2011;70:1532-1538.
25. Gabbe B, Simpson P, Sutherland A, et al. Functional measures at discharge: are they useful predictors oflonger term outcomes for trauma registries? Ann Surg. 2008;247:854-859. (Pubitemid 351591522)
26. Williamson O, Gabbe B, Sutherland A, et al. Comparing the responsiveness offunctional outcome assessmentinstruments fortraumaregistries. J Trauma. 2011;71:63-68.
27. Redmill D, Mcllwee A, Mc Nicholl B, et al. Long term outcomes 12 years after major trauma. Injury. 2006;37:243-246. (Pubitemid 43176675)
28. Sluys K, Haggmark T, Iselius L. Outcome and quality of life 5 years after major trauma. J Trauma. 2005;59:223-232. (Pubitemid 41271669)