An improved method for automatically determining webpage cohesiveness for quality information retrieval from world wide web

Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Information Quality, ICIQ 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Yadav, Surya ^a   Bellah, Jeremy ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

HTML Parser; Quality Information Retrieval; Quality Webpage; Semantic Similarity Score; Webpage Cohesiveness

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL INFORMATION; OVERALL QUALITY; QUALITY INFORMATION; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; WEB-PAGE;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; RESEARCH;

WEBSITES;

EID: 84871587438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ambre, J., R. Guard, F. Perveiler, et al. Criteria for assessing the quality of health informationon the Internet. 1997. Available at: http://www.hitiWeb.mitretek.org/docs/criteria.html.
2. Bertolazzi, Paola and Monica Scannapieco. Introducing Data Quality in a Cooperative Context. ICIQ 2001.
3. Budanitsky, A. and Hirst, G. Semantic Distance in WordNet: An Experimental, Application-oriented evaluation of five measures. Proceedings of the NAACL Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, June 2001, Pittsburgh.
4. Burgess, M S E, W A Gray, and N J Fiddian. A Flexible Quality Framework for Use within Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information Quality, 2003, pp 297-313.
5. Civan, A. and Wanda Pratt. Online health information: Multiple dimensions of quality. Proceedings MedInfo 2004.
6. Corley, Courtney and Mihalcea, Rada. Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Texts. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment. Ann Arbor, June 2005. Pages 13-18.
7. Dao, Thanh. An Improvement on Capturing Similarity between Strings. The Code Project. August 2005. http://codeproject.com/csharp/ ImproveStringSimilarity.asp.
8. eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health related Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2002; 4(3):e15. URL:http://www.jmir.org/2002/3/e15/
9. Eysenbach, G., J. Powell, O. Kuss, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web. JAMA, May 22/29-Vol 287, No. 20, 2002, pp 2691-2700. (Pubitemid 34533548)
10. Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
11. Fox, C., A. Levitin, and T. Redman. The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1994, pp 9-19. (Pubitemid 124012751)
12. Galloway, L., Chase-Iverson, N. et al. Search Engine Retrieval Effectiveness for Medical Information Queries. http://web.syr.edu/-gevander/.
13. Gertz, Michael, M. Tamer Ozsu, Gunter Saake, and Kai-Uwe Sattler. Report on the Dagstuhl Seminar "Data Quality on the Web". SIGMOD, Vol. 33, No. 1, March 2004. pp 127-132. (Pubitemid 40290251)
14. HON Foundation. 2004. http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html.
15. IEEE-USA. Quality of health information on the Internet. Approved buy Board of Directors, November 1999. http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/POSITIONS/ healthnet.html.
16. Leroy, Gondy, Tolle, Kristin M., Chen, Hsinchun. 1999. "Customizable and Ontology-Enhanced Medical Information Retrieval Interfaces." In Proceedings International Medical Informatics Association Working Group 6 on Medical Concept Representations, Phoenix, AZ.
17. Lesk, M. Automatic Sense Disambiguation using machines readable dictionaries: How to Tell a Pine Cone from an Ice Cream Cone. Proc. 1986 SIGDOC Conference, Toronto, Ontario, June, 1986.
18. Li, Yuhua, Bandar, Z.A., and McLean, David. An Approach for measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, July/August 2003, pp 871-882.
19. MedCIRCLE.org. Collaboration for Internet rating, Certification, Labeling, and Evaluation of health information. 2002, http://www.MedCIRCLE.org.
20. Morato, Jorge and Miguel Angel Marzal and Juan Llorens and Jose Moreiro. 2004. "WordNet Applications" In: Proceedings of the Second Global WordNet Conference, pp. 270-278, Brno, Czech Republic, January 20-23. http://www.fi.muni.cz/gwc2004/proc/105.pdf.
21. Nelson, J. Heuristic Evaluation. A chapter in Usability Inspection Methods. Edited by Nielsen, J. and Mack, R.L. John Wiley Sons, New York, NY. 1994.
22. Pun, Joshua C. C. and Frederick H. Lochovsky. Ranking Search Results by Web Quality Dimensions. WWW 2004, May 17-22, 2004. New York, NY.
23. Resnik, P. Using Information Content to Evaluate Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy. Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
24. Richardson, R., Smeaston, A.F., and Murphy, J. Using WordNet as a Knowledge base for measuring semantic similarity between words. Technical Report CA-1294, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, Dublin, 1994. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/richardson94using.html.
25. Simpson, Troy and Thanh Dao. Wordnet-Based Semantic Similarity Measurement. The Code Project. October 2005. http://codeproject.com/csharp/ semanticsimilaritywordnet.asp.
26. Simpson, Troy. Wordnet.Net Library. Open Source. June 2005. http://opensource.ebswift.com/WordNet.Net/.
27. Strong, D.M. Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang. Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 5, 1997, pp 103-110. (Pubitemid 127442929)
28. Zhu, X. and Susan Gauch. Incorporating quality metrics in Centralized /Distributed Information Retrieval on the World Wide Web. SIGIR 2000, Athens Greece, July 2000.