Evaluation of the luminous environment in open-plan offices with skylights

World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Including World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES) Annual Conferen

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 3818-3825

  Isoardi, Gillian ^a   Garcia Hansen, Veronica ^a   Hirning, Michael ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; DISCOMFORT GLARE; ELECTRIC LIGHTS; GLARE INDICES; HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE; LUMINANCE DATA; OPEN-PLAN OFFICES; QUEENSLAND; USER ACCEPTANCE; VISUAL COMFORT;

COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; DAYLIGHTING; ELECTRIC LIGHTING; GLARE; OFFICE BUILDINGS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84871557012     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cuttle, C., Towards the third stage of the lighting profession. Lighting Research and Technology. 42(1): p. 73-93.
2. Rea, M., ed. The IESNA Lighting Handbook, Ninth Edition. 1994, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America: New York.
3. Wienhold J. and Christoffersen J., Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction method for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras. Energy and Buildings, 2006. 38.
4. Inanici, M.N., Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data aqcuisition system. Lighting Res. Technol., 2006. 38(2): p. 123-136.
5. Coyne S., et al. The use of high dynamic range luminance mapping in the assessment, understanding and defining of visual issues in post occupancy building assessment. in IEECB Focus 2008, 10 - 11 April 2008, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
6. Van Den Wymelenberg, K., M.N. Inanici, and P. Johnson, The Effect of Luminance Distribution Patterns on Occupant Preference in a Daylit Office Environment. Leukos, 2010. 7(2): p. 103-122.
7. Konis, K., E.S. Lee, and R.D. Clear, Visual Comfort Analysis of Innovative Interior and Exterior Shading Systems for Commercial Buildings using High Resolution Luminance Images. Leukos, 2011. 7(3): p. 167-188.
8. Jakubiec, J.A. and C. Reinhart. The 'Adaptive Zone' - A Concept for Assessing Glare throughout Daylit Spaces. in 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association. 2011. Sydney, Australia.
9. Solatube. Redifine Daylighting. 2009 [cited; Available from: http://www.solatube.com.au/downloads/2007/lit/Solatube-750DS.pdf.
10. Hirning, M., S. Coyne, and I. Cowling, The Use of Luminance Mapping in Developing Discomfort Glare Research Journal of Light and Visual Environment, 2010. 34(2): p. 101-104.
11. Wienhold, J., et al. Evalglare - A new RADIANCE-based tool to evaluate daylight glare in office spaces. in 3rd International RADIANCE workshop 2004. Fribourg, Switzerland.
12. Liamputtong, P. and D. Ezzy, Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd ed. 2005, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
13. Garcia-Hansen V., Isoardi G., and Miller E. Perceptions of daylight quality delivered by light transport systems. in CIE Conference Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency, Vienna, Austria. 2010.
14. Parpairi, K., et al., The Luminance Differences index: a new indicator of user preferences in daylit spaces. Lighting Res. Technol., 2002. 34(1): p. 53-68.