Physical attractiveness and income attainment among canadians

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 1989, Pages 547-559

  Roszell, Patricia ^a   Kennedy, David ^a   Grabb, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871525459     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: 19401019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1989.10543009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams, G. R. 1977. Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Human Development, 20: 217–239.
2. Anderson, R. and Nida, S. A. 1978. Effect of physical attractiveness on opposite- and same-sex evaluations. Journal of Personality, 46: 401–413.
3. Armstrong, P. and Armstrong, H. 1984. The double ghetto, 2nd ed. Toronto, Canada: McClelland and Stewart.
4. Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. 1974. “Physical attractiveness.”. In Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 7 Edited by: Berkowitz, L. 157–215. New York: Academic Press.
5. Bielby, W. T. and Baron, J. N. 1986. Men and women at work: Sex segregation and statistical discrimination. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 759–799.
6. Campbell, K. E., Kleim, D. M. and Olson, K. R. 1986. Gender, physical attractiveness, and assertiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126: 697–698.
7. Campbell, R. T. 1979. The relationship between children's perceptions of ability and perceptions of physical attractiveness: Comments on Felson and Bohmstedt's ‘Are the good beautiful or the beautiful good?’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42: 393–398.
8. Cash, T. F., Gillen, B. and Bums, D. S. 1977. Sexism and ‘beautyism’ in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 301–310.
9. Dion, K., Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. 1972. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24: 285–290.
10. Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D. and Terpstra, E. E. 1977. Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62: 288–294.
11. Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L. and Wiback, K. 1975. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 39–43.
12. Felson, R. B. 1981. Physical attractiveness and perceptions of deviance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114: 85–89.
13. Felson, R. B. and Bohrnstedt, G. W. 1979. ‘Are the good beautiful or the beautiful good?’ The relationship between children's perceptions of ability and perceptions of physical attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42: 386–392.
14. Gillen, B. 1981. Physical attractiveness: A determinant of two types of goodness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7: 277–281.
15. Gilmore, D. C., Beehr, T. A. and Love, K. G. 1986. Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decisions. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59: 103–109.
16. Goldman, W. and Lewis, P. 1977. Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive are more socially skillful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 125–130.
17. Heilman, M. E. and Saruwatari, L. R. 1979. When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23: 360–372.
18. Heilman, M. E. and Stopeck, M. H. 1985a. Attractiveness and corporate success: Different causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 379–388.
19. Heilman, M. E. and Stopeck, M. H. 1985b. Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35: 202–215.
20. Horai, J., Naccari, N. and Fatoullah, E. 1974. The effects of expertise and physical attractiveness upon opinion agreement and liking. Sociometry, 37: 601–606.
21. Kaplan, R. M. 1978. Is beauty talent? Sex interaction in the attractiveness halo effect. Sex Roles, 4: 195–204.
22. Kleinbaum, D. G. and Kupper, L. L. 1978. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Boston: Duxbury Press.
23. Landy, D. and Signall, H. 1974. Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29: 299–304.
24. Pineo, P. C., Porter, J. and McRoberts, H. A. 1977. The 1971 census and the socioeconomic classification of occupations. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 14: 91–102.
25. Rosen, B. and Jerdee, T. H. 1973. The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58: 44–48.
26. Rosen, B. and Jerdee, T. H. 1974. Effects of applicant's sex and difficulty of job on evaluations of candidates for managerial positions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 511–512.
27. Sparacino, J. 1980. Physical attractiveness and occupational prestige among male college graduates. Psychological Report, 47: 1275–1280.
28. Udry, J. R. 1977. The importance of being beautiful: A reexamination and racial comparison. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 154–160.
29. Webster, M. and Driskell, J. E. 1983. Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89: 140–165.