Algorithms for quantitative pedology: A toolkit for soil scientists

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 52, Issue , 2013, Pages 258-268

  Beaudette, D E ^a   Roudier, P ^c   O'Geen, A T ^b  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Aggregation of soil data; Numerical soil classification; Soil classification; Soil data; Soil profile; Soil survey; Visualization

Indexed keywords

DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; HIGH DIMENSIONALITY; OPEN SOURCE FRAMEWORKS; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL DATA; SOIL PROFILES; STANDARD ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA VISUALIZATION; DIGITAL STORAGE; FLOW VISUALIZATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; SOIL SURVEYS; VISUALIZATION;

SOILS;

ALGORITHM; PEDOLOGY; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL PROFILE; SOIL SCIENCE; SOIL SURVEY; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84871520076     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allardice W., Southard R. Variability of soil characterization analyses and impacts on soil classification. Soil Survey Horizons 1991, 32:97-108.
2. Arkley R.J. Statistical methods in soil classification research. Advances in Agronomy 1976, 37-69. Academic Press, New York, NY. N.C. Brady (Ed.).
3. Beaudette D.E., O'Geen A.T. Soilweb. a seamless, online interface to soil survey information. Computers and Geosciences 2009, 35:2119-2128. 〈http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/〉.
4. Upscaling and Downscaling Methods for Environmental Research Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences 2000, vol. 88. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Brown R.B. Concerning the quality of soil survey. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1988, 43:452-455.
6. Brown R.B., Huddleston J.H. Presentation of statistical data on map units to the user. Spatial Variabilities of Soils and Landforms. SSSA Special Publication 28 1991, 127-149. SSSA, Madison, WI. M.J. Mausbach, L. Wilding (Eds.).
7. Buol S.W., Graham R.C., McDaniel P.A., Southard R.J. Soil Genesis and Classification 2003, Iowa State Press, Ames, IA. 5th ed.
8. Carré F., Jacobson M. Numerical classification of soil profile data using distance metrics. Geoderma 2009, 148:336-345.
9. Dale M., McBratney A., Russell J. On the role of expert systems and numerical taxonomy in soil classification. European Journal of Soil Science 1989, 40:223-234.
10. Fitzpatrick E.A. Soil nomenclature and classification. Geoderma 1967, 1:91-105.
11. Gower J.C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 1971, 27:857-871.
12. Heuvelink G.B.M., Pebesma E.J. Spatial aggregation and soil process modeling. Geoderma 1999, 89:47-65.
13. Kaufman L., Rousseeuw P.J. Finding Groups in Data An Introduction to Cluster Analysis 2005, Wiley-Interscience.
14. Lentz R., Simonson G. Correspondence of soil properties and classification units with sagebrush communities in southeastern oregon. I. comparisons between mono-taxa soil-vegetation units. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1987, 51:1263-1271.
15. Lentz R., Simonson G. Correspondence of soil properties and classification units with sagebrush communities in southeastern oregon. II. comparisons within a multi-taxa soil-vegetation unit. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1987, 51:1271-1276.
16. Lindbloom, B.J., 2010. Useful color equations. http://brucelindbloom.com/.
17. Little I., Ross D. The Levenshtein metric, a new means for soil classification tested by data from a sand-podzol chronosequence and evaluated by discriminant function analysis. Australian Journal of Soil Research 1985, 23:115-130.
18. Minasny B., McBratney A.B. Incorporating taxonomic distance into spatial prediction and digital mapping of soil classes. Geoderma 2007, 142:285-293.
19. Moore A., Russell J. Comparison of coefficients and grouping procedures in numerical analysis of soil trace element data. Geoderma 1967, 1:139-158.
20. Moore A., Russell J., Ward W. Numerical analysis of soils. a comparison of three soil profile models with field classification. Journal of Soil Science 1972, 23:194-209.
21. Munsell Color Science Laboratory, 2010. Munsell renotation data.
22. R Development Core Team, 2011. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
23. Rasmussen C. Distribution of soil organic and inorganic carbon pools by biome and soil taxa in Arizona. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2006, 70:256-265.
24. Rayner J. Classification of soils by numerical methods. Journal of Soil Science 1966, 17:79-92.
25. Sarkar P., Bidwell O., Marcus L. Selection of characteristics for numerical classification of soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 1966, 30:269-272.
26. Schoorl J.M., Veldkamp A. Multiscale soil-landscape process modeling. Environmental Soil-Landscape Modeling. Geographic Information Technologies and Pedometrics 2006, 417-435. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. S. Grunwald (Ed.).
27. Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, United States Department of Agriculture.
28. Soil Survey Staff, 1999. Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Number 436 in Agricultural Handbook, USDA.
29. Vanwalleghem T., Poesen J., McBratney A., Deckers J. Spatial variability of soil horizon depth in natural loess-derived soils. Geoderma 2010, 157:37-45.
30. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S 2002, Springer.
31. Webster R. Fundamental objections to the 7th approximation. Journal of Soil Science 1968, 19:354-366.
32. Webster R., Beckett P. Quality and usefulness of soil maps. Nature 1968, 219:680-682.
33. Webster R., Oliver M. Statistical Methods in Soil and Land Resource Survey 1990, Oxford University Press.
34. Young F., Hammer R. Defining geographic soil bodies by landscape position, soil taxonomy, and cluster analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2000, 64:989-998. 〈http://soil.scijournals.org/cgi/reprint/soilsci;64/3/989.pdf〉.