Assessment and zoning of eco-environmental sensitivity for a typical developing province in China

Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1095-1107

  Dai, Xiaoyan ^a   Li, Zhuo ^b   Lin, Shouyi ^b   Xu, Wencheng ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b East China Normal University   (China)

^c Shanghai Jusheng Network Information Technology Company Limited   (China)

Author keywords

Anhui province; Eco environmental sensitivity; Ecological planning; Ecological security pattern; Geographic information system

Indexed keywords

DETERIORATION; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; RATIONAL FUNCTIONS; REGIONAL PLANNING; REMOTE SENSING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ZONING;

ANHUI PROVINCE; ECO-ENVIRONMENTAL; ECOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION; ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS; ECOLOGICAL PLANNING; ECOLOGICAL SECURITY; GEOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS; SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT;

ECOLOGY;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GIS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; REMOTE SENSING; RESOURCE USE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING; ZONING SYSTEM;

ANHUI; CHINA;

EID: 84871512332     PISSN: 14363240     EISSN: 14363259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-011-0550-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anhui Bureau of Statistics (2011) 2010 Anhui Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing.
2. Bernard G, Boudouresque CF, Picon P (2007) Long term changes in Zostera meadows in the Berre lagoon (Provence, Mediterranean Sea). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73: 617-629.
3. Da L, Li L, Li W, Chen M (2004) The definition and types of urban ecological sensitive area with the case study in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China. J East China Norm Univ (Natural Science) 2: 97-103.
4. Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24: 432-440.
5. Fang QF, Yang XP, Cai Y (1997) Regional integration and sustainable development: the formulation and implementation of the development plan for urban agglomeration of Pearl-River-Delta economic region. City Plan Rev 22: 7-10.
6. Herrera-Silveira JA, Morales-Ojeda SM (2009) Evaluation of the health status of a coastal ecosystem in southeast Mexico: assessment of water quality, phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation. Mar Pollut Bull 59: 72-86.
7. Ho W (2008) Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 186: 211-228.
8. Huang SL (2000) Ecological land use planning. Zhanshi Publishing House, Taipei.
9. Huang L (2005) Study on the planning of ecological environment sensitive region in Three Gorges towns. Dissertation, Chongqing University, Chongqing.
10. Ignatieva M, Stewart GH, Meurk C (2011) Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas. Landsc Ecol Eng 7: 17-25.
11. Kusler JA (1980) Regulating sensitive lands: a guidebook. Ballinger, Cambridge.
12. Li Y, Zhua X, Sun X, Wang F (2010) Landscape effects of environmental impact on bay-area wetlands under rapid urban expansion and development policy: a case study of Lianyungang, China. Landsc Urban Plan 94: 218-227.
13. Liu K, Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Xu WH, Miao H (2003) Eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial distribution in Gansu province. Acta Ecol Sin 23: 2711-2718.
14. Liu N, Ai N, Fang Y, Yi C (2007) Application of the fuzzy matter-element model based on coefficients of entropy to evaluation of urban ecosystem health. J Chengdu Univ Technol (Science & Technology Edition) 34: 589-595.
15. Ndubisi F, DeMeo T, Ditto ND (1995) Environmentally sensitive areas: a template for developing greenway corridors. Landsc Urban Plan 33: 159-177.
16. Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Miao H (2000) China's eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial heterogeneity. Acta Ecol Sin 20: 9-11.
17. Qin Y, Yang Z, Yang W (2011) Ecological risk assessment for water scarcity in China's Yellow River Delta Wetland. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25: 697-711.
18. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1: 83-98.
19. Steiner F, Blair J, McSherry L, Guhathakurta S, Marruffo J, Holm M (2000) A watershed at a watershed: the potential for environmentally sensitive area protection in the upper San Pedro drainage basin (Mexico and USA). Landsc Urban Plan 49: 129-148.
20. Su S, Li D, Yu X, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Xiao R, Zhi J, Wu J (2011) Assessing land ecological security in Shanghai (China) based on catastrophe theory. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25: 737-746.
21. Suffling R (1980) An index of ecological sensitivity to disturbance, based on ecosystem age, and related to landscape diversity. J Environ Manag 10: 253-263.
22. Xie Z, Xu X, Yan L (2010) Analyzing qualitative and quantitative changes in coastal wetland associated to the effects of natural and anthropogenic factors in a part of Tianjin, China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 86: 379-386.
23. Yan L, Xu XG, Xie ZL, Li HL (2009) Integrated assessment on ecological sensitivity for Beijing. Acta Ecol Sin 29: 3117-3125.
24. Yang Z (2011) Ecological informatics for ecosystem conservation in view of environmental risk assessment and management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25: 641-642.
25. Zhang Z, Xu J, Han G (2007) Ecological sensitive area division indicator system. Ecol Sci 26: 79-83.
26. Zhang Z, Zhang J, Huang G (2010) Ecological sensitivity and managemental countermeasures of environments in Qingyang city, Gansu province. J Desert Res 30: 614-619.
27. Zou Z, Sun J, Ren G (2005) Study and application on the entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. Acta Sci Circumst 25: 552-556.