Improving the odds through the Collaboration Success Wizard

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 480-486

  Bietz, Matthew J ^a   Abrams, Steve ^a   Cooper, Dan M ^a   Stevens, Kathleen R ^b   Puga, Frank ^b   Patel, Darpan I ^b   Olson, Gary M ^a   Olson, Judith S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Collaboration readiness; Common ground; Evaluation; Success; Technology readiness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLLABORATION SUCCESS WIZARD; DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE; INFORMATION SERVICE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84871476841     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-012-0174-z     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Gibson CB, Cohen SG, eds. Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions For Virtual Team Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003. the Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series.
2. Stokols D, Hall KL, Moser RP, Feng A, Misra S, Taylor BK. Cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: Research, training, and translation. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010: 471-493.
3. Olson GM, Olson JS. Distance matters. Hum Comput Interact. 2000; 15(2/3): 139-178.
4. Jones C. Teleworking: The quiet revolution: Gartner Group; 2005. Publication 122284.
5. Page SE. The Difference: How the Power Of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2007.
6. Allen TD, Poteet ML, Burroughs SM. The mentor's perspective: a qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. J Vocat Behav. 1997; 51: 70-89.
7. Kraut RE, Egido C, Galegher J. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. In: Galegher J, Kraut RE, Egido C, eds. Intellectual Teamwork: Social Foundations of Cooperative Work. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1990: 149-172.
8. Cummings JN, Kiesler S. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Soc Stud Sci. 2005; 35(5): 703-722.
9. Larson C, LaFasto F. TeamWork: What Must Go Right, What Can Go Wrong. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989.
10. Mattessich PW, Murray-Close M, Monsey BR. Collaboration: What Makes It Work. Saint Paul: Wilder; 2001.
11. Olson JS, Hofer EC, Bos N, et al. A theory of remote scientific collaboration. In: Olson GM, Zimmerman A, Bos N, eds. Scientific collaboration on the internet. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008: 73-97.
12. Cramton CD. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ Sci. 2001; 12(3): 346-371.
13. Shrum W, Chompalov I, Genuth J. Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Soc Stud Sci. 2001; 31(5): 681-730.
14. Kramer RM, Tyler TR. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
15. Neale DC, Carroll JM, Rosson MB. Evaluating Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Models and Frameworks. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Chicago: ACM; 2004: 112-121.
16. Lee CP, Dourish P, Mark G. The human infrastructure of cyberinfrastructure. Proc. CSCW 2006. ACM; 2006: 483-492.
17. Ribes D, Lee C. Sociotechnical studies of cyberinfrastructure and e-research: current themes and future trajectories. Comput Supported Coop Work (CSCW). 2010; 19(3): 231-244.
18. Clark HH, Brennan SE. Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine JM, Teasley S, eds. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association; 1991: 127-149.
19. Ferrer R, Stevens KR. A mechanism to increase awareness of workarounds in Med-Surg units. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Improvement Science Summit, San Antonio, TX. 2011.